Geometric cues forecast the switch from two- to three-dimensional growth in Physcomitrella patens.
Physcomitrella patens
2D-to-3D development
asymmetric cell division
cell fate switch
geometric cues
Journal
The New phytologist
ISSN: 1469-8137
Titre abrégé: New Phytol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9882884
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
received:
28
05
2019
accepted:
12
10
2019
pubmed:
23
10
2019
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
23
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
During land colonization, plants acquired a range of body plan adaptations, of which the innovation of three-dimensional (3D) tissues increased organismal complexity and reproductivity. In the moss, Physcomitrella patens, a 3D leafy gametophore originates from filamentous cells that grow in a two-dimensional (2D) plane through a series of asymmetric cell divisions. Asymmetric cell divisions that coincide with different cell division planes and growth directions enable the developmental switch from 2D to 3D, but insights into the underlying mechanisms coordinating this switch are still incomplete. Using 2D and 3D imaging and image segmentation, we characterized two geometric cues, the width of the initial cell and the angle of the transition division plane, which sufficiently distinguished a gametophore initial cell from a branch initial cell. These identified cues were further confirmed in gametophore formation mutants. The identification of a fluorescent marker allowed us to successfully predict the gametophore initial cell with > 90% accuracy before morphological changes, supporting our hypothesis that, before the transition division, parental cells of the gametophore initials possess different properties from those of the branch initials. Our results suggest that the cell fate decision of the initial cell is determined in the parental cell, before the transition division.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31639220
doi: 10.1111/nph.16276
pmc: PMC7027797
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1945-1955Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust.
Références
Nature. 2007 Oct 25;449(7165):1053-7
pubmed: 17960244
Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2122:63-83
pubmed: 31975296
DNA Res. 2000 Feb 28;7(1):9-17
pubmed: 10718194
Curr Biol. 2018 Oct 8;28(19):3031-3043.e2
pubmed: 30245102
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015 Feb;23:1-7
pubmed: 25449720
Plant Cell. 1996 Feb;8(2):155-68
pubmed: 8742707
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2015 Sep;17(5):935-45
pubmed: 26012742
Cell. 2004 Oct 1;119(1):109-20
pubmed: 15454085
Plant Cell. 2002 Aug;14(8):1737-49
pubmed: 12172019
Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1483-1488
pubmed: 12271042
Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 24;19(6):461-71
pubmed: 19303301
Plant Physiol. 2003 Oct;133(2):470-4
pubmed: 14555775
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:497-520
pubmed: 16669772
Plant J. 2015 Aug;83(4):743-51
pubmed: 26123849
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 25;97(9):4535-40
pubmed: 10781058
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 5;28(3):473-478.e5
pubmed: 29395927
Development. 2010 Nov;137(21):3535-43
pubmed: 20940223
J Cell Biol. 2018 Mar 5;217(3):945-957
pubmed: 29374070
Development. 2012 Sep;139(17):3120-9
pubmed: 22833122
Curr Biol. 2018 Aug 6;28(15):2365-2376.e5
pubmed: 30033333
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016 Nov;73(22):4213-4229
pubmed: 27286799
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 17;114(42):E8847-E8854
pubmed: 28973935
New Phytol. 2014 Aug;203(3):794-804
pubmed: 24844771
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1413:263-82
pubmed: 27193855
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014 Feb;17:13-21
pubmed: 24507489
Elife. 2015 May 06;4:05864
pubmed: 25946108
Dev Cell. 2014 Apr 14;29(1):75-87
pubmed: 24684831
Planta. 1979 Jan;144(5):427-35
pubmed: 24407386