Transvenous lead extraction procedures in women based on ESC-EHRA EORP European Lead Extraction ConTRolled ELECTRa registry: is female sex a predictor of complications?
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
Defibrillators, Implantable
Device Removal
Electric Power Supplies
Europe
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Leukocyte Count
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Pacemaker, Artificial
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections
/ therapy
Registries
Sex Factors
Time Factors
Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency
/ epidemiology
Venous Thrombosis
/ epidemiology
Complications
Female sex
Registry
Transvenous lead extraction
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2019
01 12 2019
Historique:
received:
15
06
2019
accepted:
28
09
2019
pubmed:
31
10
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
31
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Female sex is considered an independent risk factor of transvenous leads extraction (TLE) procedure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of TLE in women compared with men. A post hoc analysis of risk factors and effectiveness of TLE in women and men included in the ESC-EHRA EORP ELECTRa registry was conducted. The rate of major complications was 1.96% in women vs. 0.71% in men; P = 0.0025. The number of leads was higher in men (mean 1.89 vs. 1.71; P < 0.0001) with higher number of abandoned leads in women (46.04% vs. 34.82%; P < 0.0001). Risk factors of TLE differed between the sexes, of which the major were: signs and symptoms of venous occlusion [odds ratio (OR) 3.730, confidence interval (CI) 1.401-9.934; P = 0.0084], cumulative leads dwell time (OR 1.044, CI 1.024-1.065; P < 0.001), number of generator replacements (OR 1.029, CI 1.005-1.054; P = 0.0184) in females and the number of leads (OR 6.053, CI 2.422-15.129; P = 0.0001), use of powered sheaths (OR 2.742, CI 1.404-5.355; P = 0.0031), and white blood cell count (OR 1.138, CI 1.069-1.212; P < 0.001) in males. Individual radiological and clinical success of TLE was 96.29% and 98.14% in women compared with 98.03% and 99.21% in men (P = 0.0046 and 0.0098). The efficacy of TLE was lower in females than males, with a higher rate of periprocedural major complications. The reasons for this difference are probably related to disparities in risk factors in women, including more pronounced leads adherence to the walls of the veins and myocardium. Lead management may be key to the effectiveness of TLE in females.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31665280
pii: 5607703
doi: 10.1093/europace/euz277
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1890-1899Investigateurs
Christopher Peter Gale
(CP)
Branko Beleslin
(B)
Andrzej Budaj
(A)
Ovidiu Chioncel
(O)
Nikolaos Dagres
(N)
Nicolas Danchin
(N)
David Erlinge
(D)
Jonathan Emberson
(J)
Michael Glikson
(M)
Alastair Gray
(A)
Meral Kayikcioglu
(M)
Aldo Maggioni
(A)
Klaudia Vivien Nagy
(KV)
Aleksandr Nedoshivin
(A)
Anna-Sonia Petronio
(AS)
Jolien Roos-Hesselink
(J)
Lars Wallentin
(L)
Uwe Zeymer
(U)
Maria Grazia Bongiorni
(MG)
Carina Blomstrom Lundqvist
(CB)
Angelo Auricchio
(A)
Christian Butter
(C)
Nikolaos Dagres
(N)
Jean-Claude Deharo
(JC)
Christopher A Rinaldi
(CA)
Aldo P Maggioni
(AP)
Andrzej Kutarski
(A)
Charles Kennergren
(C)
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.