Performance of a selective screening strategy for diagnosis of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy as defined by IADPSG/WHO criteria.
Adult
Cesarean Section
Diabetes, Gestational
/ diagnosis
Female
Fetal Macrosomia
/ epidemiology
France
/ epidemiology
Gestational Weight Gain
Glucose Tolerance Test
Humans
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
Maternal Age
Medical History Taking
Obesity, Maternal
/ epidemiology
Pre-Eclampsia
/ epidemiology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy in Diabetics
/ diagnosis
Premature Birth
/ epidemiology
Prenatal Diagnosis
/ methods
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
/ epidemiology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Shoulder Dystocia
/ epidemiology
Diabetes in pregnancy
Early gestational diabetes mellitus
Guidelines
International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups
Prognosis
Screening
Journal
Diabetes & metabolism
ISSN: 1878-1780
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Metab
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9607599
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
10
05
2019
revised:
12
08
2019
accepted:
29
09
2019
pubmed:
2
11
2019
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
2
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our study evaluated the performance of a selective screening strategy for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (HIP) based on the presence of risk factors (RFs; body mass index≥25kg/m Women with no known diabetes who had undergone complete universal screening (early, before 22weeks of gestation and, if normal, in the second part of pregnancy) at our department (2012-2016) were selected, resulting in four groups of women according to the presence of HIP and/or RFs, with a predefined composite endpoint (preeclampsia or large-for-gestational-age infant or shoulder dystocia). Included were 4518 women: 23.5% had HIP and 71.1% had at least one RF. The distribution among our four groups was: HIP-/RF- (n=1144); HIP-/RF+ (n=2313); HIP+/RF- (n=163); and HIP+/RF+ (n=898). HIP was more frequent when RFs were present rather than absent (33.1% vs 15.4%, respectively; P<0.001). Incidence of the composite endpoint differed significantly (P<0.0001) across groups [HIP-/RF- 6.3%; HIP-/RF+ 13.2%; HIP+/RF- 8.6%; and HIP+/RF+ 17.1% (HIP effect: P<0.05; RF effect: P<0.001; interaction HIP * RF: P=0.94)] and significantly increased with the number of RFs (no RF: 6.3%, 1 RF: 10.8%, 2 RFs: 14.7%, 3 RFs: 28.0%, 4-5 RFs: 25.0%; P<0.0001). RFs are predictive of HIP, although 15.4% of women with HIP have no RFs. Also, irrespective of HIP status, RFs are predictive of HIP-related events, suggesting that overweight/obesity, the only modifiable RFs, could be targets of interventions to improve pregnancy prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31672576
pii: S1262-3636(19)30157-0
doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.09.002
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
311-318Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.