Accurate detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancers by bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR.


Journal

BMC medical genomics
ISSN: 1755-8794
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101319628

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 11 2019
Historique:
received: 06 05 2019
accepted: 24 10 2019
entrez: 13 11 2019
pubmed: 13 11 2019
medline: 3 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. However, colorectal cancers harboring constitutive activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes are not responsive to anti-EGFR therapy. To select patients for appropriate treatment, genetic testing of these three genes is routinely performed. We applied bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR (BNA-clamp PCR) to detect somatic hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. PCR products from BNA-clamp PCR were subsequently analyzed Sanger sequencing. We then compared results with those from the PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR-rSSO) method, which has been used as in vitro diagnostic test in Japan. To validate the mutation status, we also performed next generation sequencing using all samples. In 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, KRAS mutations were detected at frequencies of 50% (25/50) and 52% (26/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively, and NRAS mutations were detected at 12% (6/50) and 12% (6/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively. The concordance rate for detection of KRAS and NRAS mutations between the two was 94% (47/50). However, there were three discordant results. We validated these three discordant and 47 concordant results by next generation sequencing. All mutations identified by BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing were also identified by next generation sequencing. BNA-clamp PCR detected BRAF mutations in 6% (3/50) of tumor samples. Our results indicate that BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing detects somatic mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF with high accuracy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. However, colorectal cancers harboring constitutive activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes are not responsive to anti-EGFR therapy. To select patients for appropriate treatment, genetic testing of these three genes is routinely performed.
METHODS
We applied bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR (BNA-clamp PCR) to detect somatic hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. PCR products from BNA-clamp PCR were subsequently analyzed Sanger sequencing. We then compared results with those from the PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR-rSSO) method, which has been used as in vitro diagnostic test in Japan. To validate the mutation status, we also performed next generation sequencing using all samples.
RESULTS
In 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, KRAS mutations were detected at frequencies of 50% (25/50) and 52% (26/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively, and NRAS mutations were detected at 12% (6/50) and 12% (6/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively. The concordance rate for detection of KRAS and NRAS mutations between the two was 94% (47/50). However, there were three discordant results. We validated these three discordant and 47 concordant results by next generation sequencing. All mutations identified by BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing were also identified by next generation sequencing. BNA-clamp PCR detected BRAF mutations in 6% (3/50) of tumor samples.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing detects somatic mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF with high accuracy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31711486
doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0610-8
pii: 10.1186/s12920-019-0610-8
pmc: PMC6849194
doi:

Substances chimiques

KRAS protein, human 0
Membrane Proteins 0
DNA 9007-49-2
BRAF protein, human EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf EC 2.7.11.1
GTP Phosphohydrolases EC 3.6.1.-
NRAS protein, human EC 3.6.1.-
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) EC 3.6.5.2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

162

Références

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0122003
pubmed: 25794279
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5705-12
pubmed: 19001320
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 10;9(6):e99769
pubmed: 24914952
J Biol Chem. 2001 Jan 26;276(4):2354-60
pubmed: 11035027
BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 26;17(1):833
pubmed: 27782820
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 25;8(35):59268-59281
pubmed: 28938635
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):753-62
pubmed: 20619739
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65
pubmed: 18946061
Med Oncol. 2017 Jan;34(1):3
pubmed: 27900589
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 1;22(7):1201-8
pubmed: 14993230
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 31;9(12):10635-10649
pubmed: 29535832
Tissue Antigens. 1992 Aug;40(2):100-3
pubmed: 1357778
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):13-21
pubmed: 25115304
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34
pubmed: 18316791
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):31133-31143
pubmed: 28415711
Hepatol Res. 2016 Oct;46(11):1145-1151
pubmed: 26850916
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Jan;488:129-134
pubmed: 30395866
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;54(8):674-686
pubmed: 30666417
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):65
pubmed: 28103823
Cancer Med. 2016 Dec;5(12):3426-3436
pubmed: 27774772
Oncotarget. 2017 May 24;8(45):79404-79413
pubmed: 29108319
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011 May;50(5):307-12
pubmed: 21305640
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1658-64
pubmed: 17470858
Cancer. 2016 Jan 1;122(1):84-90
pubmed: 26439132
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 28;24(4):511-518
pubmed: 29398872
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015 Mar;3(2):121-9
pubmed: 25802882
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Apr 9;130(14):4886-96
pubmed: 18341342
J Vis Exp. 2018 Mar 21;(133):
pubmed: 29630047
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Feb;489:164-168
pubmed: 29111094
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015 Sep;3(5):459-66
pubmed: 26436112
Nature. 2012 Jul 18;487(7407):330-7
pubmed: 22810696
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 6;8(70):114463-114473
pubmed: 29383094
EBioMedicine. 2015 Feb 14;2(4):317-23
pubmed: 26137573
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):337-45
pubmed: 15269313
Neoplasia. 2018 Dec;20(12):1219-1226
pubmed: 30412858
Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct;14(4):4428-4432
pubmed: 29085438
Respir Med Case Rep. 2017 Feb 17;20:171-175
pubmed: 28275538
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:349-357
pubmed: 29078173

Auteurs

Yuki Nagakubo (Y)

Division of Genetics and Clinical Laboratory, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.

Yosuke Hirotsu (Y)

Division of Genetics and Clinical Laboratory, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan. hirotsu-bdyu@ych.pref.yamanashi.jp.
Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan. hirotsu-bdyu@ych.pref.yamanashi.jp.

Kenji Amemiya (K)

Division of Genetics and Clinical Laboratory, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.

Toshio Oyama (T)

Department of Pathology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.

Hitoshi Mochizuki (H)

Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.

Masao Omata (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Fujimi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan.
The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH