Accurate detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancers by bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR.
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ genetics
DNA
/ chemistry
GTP Phosphohydrolases
/ genetics
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Membrane Proteins
/ genetics
Mutation
Neoplasm Metastasis
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
/ genetics
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
Sequence Analysis, DNA
BNA
BRAF
Colorectal cancer
KRAS
NRAS
Journal
BMC medical genomics
ISSN: 1755-8794
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101319628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 11 2019
11 11 2019
Historique:
received:
06
05
2019
accepted:
24
10
2019
entrez:
13
11
2019
pubmed:
13
11
2019
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. However, colorectal cancers harboring constitutive activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes are not responsive to anti-EGFR therapy. To select patients for appropriate treatment, genetic testing of these three genes is routinely performed. We applied bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR (BNA-clamp PCR) to detect somatic hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. PCR products from BNA-clamp PCR were subsequently analyzed Sanger sequencing. We then compared results with those from the PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR-rSSO) method, which has been used as in vitro diagnostic test in Japan. To validate the mutation status, we also performed next generation sequencing using all samples. In 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, KRAS mutations were detected at frequencies of 50% (25/50) and 52% (26/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively, and NRAS mutations were detected at 12% (6/50) and 12% (6/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively. The concordance rate for detection of KRAS and NRAS mutations between the two was 94% (47/50). However, there were three discordant results. We validated these three discordant and 47 concordant results by next generation sequencing. All mutations identified by BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing were also identified by next generation sequencing. BNA-clamp PCR detected BRAF mutations in 6% (3/50) of tumor samples. Our results indicate that BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing detects somatic mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF with high accuracy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. However, colorectal cancers harboring constitutive activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes are not responsive to anti-EGFR therapy. To select patients for appropriate treatment, genetic testing of these three genes is routinely performed.
METHODS
We applied bridged nucleic acid-clamp real-time PCR (BNA-clamp PCR) to detect somatic hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. PCR products from BNA-clamp PCR were subsequently analyzed Sanger sequencing. We then compared results with those from the PCR-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR-rSSO) method, which has been used as in vitro diagnostic test in Japan. To validate the mutation status, we also performed next generation sequencing using all samples.
RESULTS
In 50 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, KRAS mutations were detected at frequencies of 50% (25/50) and 52% (26/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively, and NRAS mutations were detected at 12% (6/50) and 12% (6/50) by PCR-rSSO and BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing, respectively. The concordance rate for detection of KRAS and NRAS mutations between the two was 94% (47/50). However, there were three discordant results. We validated these three discordant and 47 concordant results by next generation sequencing. All mutations identified by BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing were also identified by next generation sequencing. BNA-clamp PCR detected BRAF mutations in 6% (3/50) of tumor samples.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that BNA-clamp PCR with Sanger sequencing detects somatic mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF with high accuracy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31711486
doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0610-8
pii: 10.1186/s12920-019-0610-8
pmc: PMC6849194
doi:
Substances chimiques
KRAS protein, human
0
Membrane Proteins
0
DNA
9007-49-2
BRAF protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
GTP Phosphohydrolases
EC 3.6.1.-
NRAS protein, human
EC 3.6.1.-
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
EC 3.6.5.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
162Références
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0122003
pubmed: 25794279
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5705-12
pubmed: 19001320
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 10;9(6):e99769
pubmed: 24914952
J Biol Chem. 2001 Jan 26;276(4):2354-60
pubmed: 11035027
BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 26;17(1):833
pubmed: 27782820
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 25;8(35):59268-59281
pubmed: 28938635
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):753-62
pubmed: 20619739
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65
pubmed: 18946061
Med Oncol. 2017 Jan;34(1):3
pubmed: 27900589
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 1;22(7):1201-8
pubmed: 14993230
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 31;9(12):10635-10649
pubmed: 29535832
Tissue Antigens. 1992 Aug;40(2):100-3
pubmed: 1357778
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):13-21
pubmed: 25115304
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34
pubmed: 18316791
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):31133-31143
pubmed: 28415711
Hepatol Res. 2016 Oct;46(11):1145-1151
pubmed: 26850916
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Jan;488:129-134
pubmed: 30395866
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;54(8):674-686
pubmed: 30666417
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):65
pubmed: 28103823
Cancer Med. 2016 Dec;5(12):3426-3436
pubmed: 27774772
Oncotarget. 2017 May 24;8(45):79404-79413
pubmed: 29108319
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011 May;50(5):307-12
pubmed: 21305640
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1658-64
pubmed: 17470858
Cancer. 2016 Jan 1;122(1):84-90
pubmed: 26439132
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 28;24(4):511-518
pubmed: 29398872
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015 Mar;3(2):121-9
pubmed: 25802882
J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Apr 9;130(14):4886-96
pubmed: 18341342
J Vis Exp. 2018 Mar 21;(133):
pubmed: 29630047
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Feb;489:164-168
pubmed: 29111094
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2015 Sep;3(5):459-66
pubmed: 26436112
Nature. 2012 Jul 18;487(7407):330-7
pubmed: 22810696
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 6;8(70):114463-114473
pubmed: 29383094
EBioMedicine. 2015 Feb 14;2(4):317-23
pubmed: 26137573
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):337-45
pubmed: 15269313
Neoplasia. 2018 Dec;20(12):1219-1226
pubmed: 30412858
Oncol Lett. 2017 Oct;14(4):4428-4432
pubmed: 29085438
Respir Med Case Rep. 2017 Feb 17;20:171-175
pubmed: 28275538
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:349-357
pubmed: 29078173