Presumed adverse events in health care are a frequent indication for medico-legal autopsy in Finland.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Autopsy
/ statistics & numerical data
Cause of Death
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Finland
Forensic Medicine
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Malpractice
/ statistics & numerical data
Medical Errors
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Surgical Procedures, Operative
/ adverse effects
Young Adult
Adverse event
Clinical risk management
Malpractice
Medical error
Medico-legal autopsy
Journal
Forensic science, medicine, and pathology
ISSN: 1556-2891
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Med Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101236111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
accepted:
02
10
2019
pubmed:
20
11
2019
medline:
17
3
2021
entrez:
20
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The medico-legal autopsy is an essential tool in investigating deaths caused by an adverse event in health care, for both clinical risk management and for professional liability issues. However, there are no statistics available regarding the frequency of autopsies performed due to suspected adverse events. This study aimed to determine the number of medico-legal autopsies done because of presumed adverse events, whether these events were unintentional, medical errors or cases in which malpractice was suspected. Furthermore, differences in treatment types, causes and manner of death were analyzed. The data was obtained from all medico-legal autopsies performed in Northern Finland and Lapland during 2014-2015 (n = 2027). Adverse events were suspected in 181 (8.9%) cases. The suspicions of an adverse event occurring were most often related to medication, gastrointestinal surgery and orthopedic surgery. The manner of death was classified as medical (or surgical) treatment or investigative procedure in 22 (12.2%) cases. The causes of death were completely unrelated to the suspected adverse event in 41 (22.7%) cases. In conclusion, the frequency of presumed adverse events was quite high in this data set, but in the majority of the cases, the suspicion of an adverse event causing death was disproved by an autopsy. Nonetheless, proper investigation of these cases is essential to ensure legal protection of the deceased, next of kin and health care personnel, as well as to support clinical risk management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31741207
doi: 10.1007/s12024-019-00193-4
pii: 10.1007/s12024-019-00193-4
pmc: PMC7069901
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65-70Références
BMJ. 2016 May 03;353:i2139
pubmed: 27143499
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):465
pubmed: 28683802
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Sep;126(9):1023-31
pubmed: 12204050
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Sep 10;190(1-3):67-73
pubmed: 19560295
Int J Legal Med. 2013 May;127(3):541-3
pubmed: 23455848
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Apr;11 Suppl 1:S76-9
pubmed: 19289305
Int J Legal Med. 2013 May;127(3):545-57
pubmed: 23564275
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 1995 Dec;49(6):458-65
pubmed: 8583689
Duodecim. 2006;122(20):2459-70
pubmed: 17233352
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Sep 10;190(1-3):58-66
pubmed: 19524380