Association of Umbilical Cord Milking vs Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping With Death or Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage Among Preterm Infants.
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 11 2019
19 11 2019
Historique:
entrez:
20
11
2019
pubmed:
20
11
2019
medline:
28
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Umbilical cord milking as an alternative to delayed umbilical cord clamping may provide equivalent benefits to preterm infants, but without delaying resuscitation. To determine whether the rates of death or severe intraventricular hemorrhage differ among preterm infants receiving placental transfusion with umbilical cord milking vs delayed umbilical cord clamping. Noninferiority randomized clinical trial of preterm infants (born at 23-31 weeks' gestation) from 9 university and private medical centers in 4 countries were recruited and enrolled between June 2017 and September 2018. Planned enrollment was 750 per group. However, a safety signal comprising an imbalance in the number of severe intraventricular hemorrhage events by study group was observed at the first interim analysis; enrollment was stopped based on recommendations from the data and safety monitoring board. The planned noninferiority analysis could not be conducted and a post hoc comparison was performed instead. Final date of follow-up was December 2018. Participants were randomized to umbilical cord milking (n = 236) or delayed umbilical cord clamping (n = 238). The primary outcome was a composite of death or severe intraventricular hemorrhage to determine noninferiority of umbilical cord milking with a 1% noninferiority margin. Among 540 infants randomized, 474 (88%) were enrolled and completed the trial (mean gestational age of 28 weeks; 46% female). Twelve percent (29/236) of the umbilical cord milking group died or developed severe intraventricular hemorrhage compared with 8% (20/238) of the delayed umbilical cord clamping group (risk difference, 4% [95% CI, -2% to 9%]; P = .16). Although there was no statistically significant difference in death, severe intraventricular hemorrhage was statistically significantly higher in the umbilical cord milking group than in the delayed umbilical cord clamping group (8% [20/236] vs 3% [8/238], respectively; risk difference, 5% [95% CI, 1% to 9%]; P = .02). The test for interaction between gestational age strata and treatment group was significant for severe intraventricular hemorrhage only (P = .003); among infants born at 23 to 27 weeks' gestation, severe intraventricular hemorrhage was statistically significantly higher with umbilical cord milking than with delayed umbilical cord clamping (22% [20/93] vs 6% [5/89], respectively; risk difference, 16% [95% CI, 6% to 26%]; P = .002). In this post hoc analysis of a prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial of umbilical cord milking vs delayed umbilical cord clamping among preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of a composite outcome of death or severe intraventricular hemorrhage, but there was a statistically significantly higher rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage in the umbilical cord milking group. The early study termination and resulting post hoc nature of the analyses preclude definitive conclusions. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03019367.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31742630
pii: 2755614
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16004
pmc: PMC6865839
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03019367']
Types de publication
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1877-1886Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD088646
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jul;169(7):631-8
pubmed: 26010418
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1970-9
pubmed: 20472939
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):480-4
pubmed: 22371462
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Feb;32(3):477-482
pubmed: 28934915
Pediatr Res. 2002 Mar;51(3):310-6
pubmed: 11861935
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 21;10(9):e0138829
pubmed: 26390401
Clin Perinatol. 2014 Mar;41(1):47-67
pubmed: 24524446
Pediatr Res. 2007 Apr;61(4):467-73
pubmed: 17515873
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 May;212:144-149
pubmed: 28363188
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2445-2455
pubmed: 29081267
J Pediatr. 1978 Apr;92(4):529-34
pubmed: 305471
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):1-18
pubmed: 29097178
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan;169(1):18-25
pubmed: 25365246
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Nov;103(6):F539-F546
pubmed: 29208663
Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):61-9
pubmed: 26122803
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 25;8(1):6511
pubmed: 29695729
J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:76-80
pubmed: 29246467