Cognitive performance and cognitive workload in multiple sclerosis: Two different constructs of cognitive functioning?


Journal

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders
ISSN: 2211-0356
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler Relat Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101580247

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 03 07 2019
revised: 24 09 2019
accepted: 04 11 2019
pubmed: 20 11 2019
medline: 20 1 2021
entrez: 20 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cognitive impairment in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (iwMS) is traditionally diagnosed using performance measures on cognitive tests. Yet, performance on cognitive tests does not convey the amount of mental effort or cognitive workload it takes to complete the task. The main aim was to evaluate whether cognitive performance and cognitive workload are two different constructs of cognitive functioning in iwMS. IwMS were categorized into cognitive impairments (iwMS+, n = 10) and no cognitive impairments (iwMS-, n = 12) using their performance on Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Their scores on BICAMS, Stroop, and trail making tests were compared to age- and education-matched controls (n = 22). Cognitive workload was assessed using the self-reported NASA Task Load Index and the Index of Cognitive Activity, derived from pupillary response. IwMS+ performed worse on most cognitive tests compared to iwMS- and controls. However, iwMS+ did not report or exhibit greater cognitive workload compared to the other groups. Potential confounding variables, such as sex, use of antidepressants, and symptoms of depression, fatigue, and dysautonomia did not influence the lack of correlation between cognitive performance and cognitive workload in all three groups. Cognitive performance and cognitive workload seem to measure different cognitive constructs of cognitive functioning in MS. Our results suggest that iwMS+ do not show effective allocation of cognitive resources to compensate for deteriorated performance in cognitive tests.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cognitive impairment in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (iwMS) is traditionally diagnosed using performance measures on cognitive tests. Yet, performance on cognitive tests does not convey the amount of mental effort or cognitive workload it takes to complete the task. The main aim was to evaluate whether cognitive performance and cognitive workload are two different constructs of cognitive functioning in iwMS.
METHODS METHODS
IwMS were categorized into cognitive impairments (iwMS+, n = 10) and no cognitive impairments (iwMS-, n = 12) using their performance on Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Their scores on BICAMS, Stroop, and trail making tests were compared to age- and education-matched controls (n = 22). Cognitive workload was assessed using the self-reported NASA Task Load Index and the Index of Cognitive Activity, derived from pupillary response.
RESULTS RESULTS
IwMS+ performed worse on most cognitive tests compared to iwMS- and controls. However, iwMS+ did not report or exhibit greater cognitive workload compared to the other groups. Potential confounding variables, such as sex, use of antidepressants, and symptoms of depression, fatigue, and dysautonomia did not influence the lack of correlation between cognitive performance and cognitive workload in all three groups.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Cognitive performance and cognitive workload seem to measure different cognitive constructs of cognitive functioning in MS. Our results suggest that iwMS+ do not show effective allocation of cognitive resources to compensate for deteriorated performance in cognitive tests.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31743847
pii: S2211-0348(19)30494-8
doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101505
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Sevelamer 9YCX42I8IU

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101505

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Hannes Devos (H)

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS, USA. Electronic address: hdevos@kumc.edu.

Abiodun E Akinwuntan (AE)

Dean's Office, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Nesreen Alissa (N)

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS, USA.

Bunmi Morohunfola (B)

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS, USA.

Sharon Lynch (S)

Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH