Decision-making based on 3D printed models in laparoscopic liver resections with intraoperative ultrasound: a prospective observational study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ diagnostic imaging
Clinical Decision-Making
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ pathology
Female
Hepatectomy
/ methods
Hepatic Veins
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Intraoperative Care
/ methods
Laparoscopy
/ methods
Liver Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Metastasectomy
Middle Aged
Models, Anatomic
Portal Vein
/ diagnostic imaging
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Prospective Studies
Solitary Fibrous Tumors
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonography
/ methods
3D printing
Decision-making
Hepatectomy
Liver cancer
Ultrasonography
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
02
08
2019
accepted:
11
10
2019
revised:
28
08
2019
pubmed:
28
11
2019
medline:
28
1
2021
entrez:
28
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate impact of 3D printed models on decision-making in context of laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) performed with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) guidance. Nineteen patients with liver malignances (74% were colorectal cancer metastases) were prospectively qualified for LLR or radiofrequency ablation in a single center from April 2017 to December 2018. Models were 3DP in all cases based on CT and facilitated optical visualization of tumors' relationships with portal and hepatic veins. Planned surgical extent and its changes were tracked after CT analysis and 3D model inspection, as well as intraoperatively using IOUS. Nineteen patients were included in the analysis. Information from either 3DP or IOUS led to changes in the planned surgical approach in 13/19 (68%) patients. In 5/19 (26%) patients, the 3DP model altered the plan of the surgery preoperatively. In 4/19 (21%) patients, 3DP independently changed the approach. In one patient, IOUS modified the plan post-3DP. In 8/19 (42%) patients, 3DP model did not change the approach, whereas IOUS did. In total, IOUS altered surgical plans in 9 (47%) cases. Most of those changes (6/9; 67%) were caused by detection of additional lesions not visible on CT and 3DP. 3DP can be helpful in planning complex and major LLRs and led to changes in surgical approach in 26.3% (5/19 patients) in our series. 3DP may serve as a useful adjunct to IOUS. • 3D printing can help in decision-making before major and complex resections in patients with liver cancer. • In 5/19 patients, 3D printed model altered surgical plan preoperatively. • Most surgical plan changes based on intraoperative ultrasonography were caused by detection of additional lesions not visible on CT and 3D model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31773294
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06511-2
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06511-2
pmc: PMC7033053
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1306-1312Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : T32 EB021955
Pays : United States
Organisme : Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego (PL)
ID : 0054/DIA/2018/47
Références
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):5-26
pubmed: 26843910
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):208-209
pubmed: 29064901
World J Surg. 2011 Dec;35(12):2779-87
pubmed: 21959929
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Dec;23(12):943-947
pubmed: 28530492
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jun;103:76-83
pubmed: 29803390
World J Surg. 2013 Nov;37(11):2655-63
pubmed: 23974959
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 May 28;23(20):3581-3588
pubmed: 28611511
World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3163-6
pubmed: 25145821
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):199-207
pubmed: 28657937
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):959-64
pubmed: 22968066
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):1002-5
pubmed: 25135446
Cir Esp. 2008 Mar;83(3):134-8
pubmed: 18341902
Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):e9; author reply e16-9
pubmed: 22868369
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Feb;218(2):e37-41
pubmed: 24315651
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2504-8
pubmed: 24566751
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017 Jun;26(3):135-143
pubmed: 28084141
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):291-311
pubmed: 28220382
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1491-1507
pubmed: 30203210
Surgery. 2018 May;163(5):985-995
pubmed: 29555197
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Sep;88(9):882-885
pubmed: 29266603
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Apr;12(3):181-7
pubmed: 20590885
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Oct;31(5):692-701
pubmed: 29633052
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Jan;50(1):4-9
pubmed: 26912523
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018 Apr;8(3):311-325
pubmed: 29774184
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Mar;45(3):635-645
pubmed: 27875009
Acad Radiol. 2018 Jan;25(1):52-65
pubmed: 29030285
3D Print Med. 2018 Nov 21;4(1):11
pubmed: 30649688
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):818-26
pubmed: 17136470
J Surg Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;71(1):14-7
pubmed: 24411417
Surg Today. 2017 Apr;47(4):521-524
pubmed: 27456277
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18
pubmed: 29064908
World J Surg. 2016 Aug;40(8):1969-76
pubmed: 27172803
J Int Med Res. 2018 Apr;46(4):1570-1578
pubmed: 29436243
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Dec;12(12):2047-2054
pubmed: 28144830
Urology. 2019 Sep;131:255-261
pubmed: 31233814
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Jan;9(1):43-52
pubmed: 30788245
Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):535-42
pubmed: 23339035