Towards standardized postprocessing of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking - OptiStrain CMR-FT study.
Adult
Aged
Cardiomyopathy, Dilated
/ diagnostic imaging
Case-Control Studies
Female
Germany
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ standards
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
/ standards
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Ischemia
/ diagnostic imaging
Observer Variation
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Stroke Volume
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
/ diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Function, Left
Young Adult
Cardiac magnetic resonance
Feature tracking
Longitudinal strain
Myocardial deformation
Standardization
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
ISSN: 1471-2261
Titre abrégé: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 11 2019
27 11 2019
Historique:
received:
22
02
2019
accepted:
12
11
2019
entrez:
29
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
27
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important prognostic biomarker. Its everyday clinical use is limited due to methodological and postprocessing diversity among the users and vendors. Standardization of postprocessing approaches may reduce the random operator-dependent variability, allowing for comparability of measurements despite the systematic vendor-related differences. We investigated the random component of variability in GLS measurements by optimization steps which incrementally improved observer reproducibility and agreement. Cine images in two-, three- and four-chamber-views were serially analysed by two independent observers using two different CMR-FT softwares. The disparity of outcomes after each series was systematically assessed after a number of stepwise adjustments which were shown to significantly reduce the inter-observer and intervendor bias, resulting standardized postprocessing approach. The final analysis was performed in 44 subjects (ischaemic heart disease n = 15, non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy, n = 19, healthy controls, n = 10). All measurements were performed blind to the underlying group allocation and previous measurements. Inter- and intra-observer variability were tested using Bland-Altman analyses, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CVs). Compared to controls, mean GLS was significantly lower in patients, as well as between the two subgroups (p < 0.01). These differences were accentuated by standardization procedures, with significant increase in Cohen's D and AUCs. The benefit of standardization was also evident through improved CV and ICC agreements between observers and the two vendors. Initial intra-observer variability CVs for GLS parameters were 7.6 and 4.6%, inter-observer variability CVs were 11 and 4.7%, for the two vendors, respectively. After standardization, intra- and interobserver variability CVs were 3.1 and 4.3%, and 5.2 and 4.4%, respectively. Standardization of GLS postprocessing helps to reduce the random component of variability, introduced by inconsistencies of and between observers, and also intervendor variability, but not the systematic inter-vendor bias due to differences in image processing algorithms. Standardization of GLS measurements is an essential step in ensuring the reliable quantification of myocardial deformation, and implementation of CMR-FT in clinical routine.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important prognostic biomarker. Its everyday clinical use is limited due to methodological and postprocessing diversity among the users and vendors. Standardization of postprocessing approaches may reduce the random operator-dependent variability, allowing for comparability of measurements despite the systematic vendor-related differences.
METHODS
We investigated the random component of variability in GLS measurements by optimization steps which incrementally improved observer reproducibility and agreement. Cine images in two-, three- and four-chamber-views were serially analysed by two independent observers using two different CMR-FT softwares. The disparity of outcomes after each series was systematically assessed after a number of stepwise adjustments which were shown to significantly reduce the inter-observer and intervendor bias, resulting standardized postprocessing approach. The final analysis was performed in 44 subjects (ischaemic heart disease n = 15, non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy, n = 19, healthy controls, n = 10). All measurements were performed blind to the underlying group allocation and previous measurements. Inter- and intra-observer variability were tested using Bland-Altman analyses, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CVs).
RESULTS
Compared to controls, mean GLS was significantly lower in patients, as well as between the two subgroups (p < 0.01). These differences were accentuated by standardization procedures, with significant increase in Cohen's D and AUCs. The benefit of standardization was also evident through improved CV and ICC agreements between observers and the two vendors. Initial intra-observer variability CVs for GLS parameters were 7.6 and 4.6%, inter-observer variability CVs were 11 and 4.7%, for the two vendors, respectively. After standardization, intra- and interobserver variability CVs were 3.1 and 4.3%, and 5.2 and 4.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Standardization of GLS postprocessing helps to reduce the random component of variability, introduced by inconsistencies of and between observers, and also intervendor variability, but not the systematic inter-vendor bias due to differences in image processing algorithms. Standardization of GLS measurements is an essential step in ensuring the reliable quantification of myocardial deformation, and implementation of CMR-FT in clinical routine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31775656
doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1255-4
pii: 10.1186/s12872-019-1255-4
pmc: PMC6882184
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
267Subventions
Organisme : DZHK
ID : none
Pays : International
Références
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 May 01;15:35
pubmed: 23634753
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Aug 26;18(1):51
pubmed: 27561421
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):307-15
pubmed: 25246506
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Dec;8(12):1444-1460
pubmed: 26699113
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Oct;85(1008):538-45
pubmed: 19789193
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;9(1):40-50
pubmed: 26762873
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Feb;3(2):144-51
pubmed: 20159640
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1459-64
pubmed: 16613929
Circulation. 2005 Oct 4;112(14):2157-62
pubmed: 16203928
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(5):356-64
pubmed: 19808623
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Feb;11(2 Pt 1):196-205
pubmed: 28528164
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):e004077
pubmed: 27009468
PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0127044
pubmed: 25978372
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 20;71(7):766-778
pubmed: 29447739
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jun 06;6:2048004017712862
pubmed: 28660071
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Mar;27(3):292-301
pubmed: 24440110
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Oct 21;16:69
pubmed: 25384607