Validation and characterisation of a DNA methylation alcohol biomarker across the life course.
ALSPAC
AUDIT
Alcohol use disorder
CHARGE
Prediction
Journal
Clinical epigenetics
ISSN: 1868-7083
Titre abrégé: Clin Epigenetics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101516977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 11 2019
27 11 2019
Historique:
received:
24
05
2019
accepted:
23
09
2019
entrez:
29
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recently, an alcohol predictor was developed using DNA methylation at 144 CpG sites (DNAm-Alc) as a biomarker for improved clinical or epidemiologic assessment of alcohol-related ill health. We validate the performance and characterise the drivers of this DNAm-Alc for the first time in independent populations. In N = 1049 parents from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Accessible Resource for Integrated Epigenomic Studies (ARIES) at midlife, we found DNAm-Alc explained 7.6% of the variation in alcohol intake, roughly half of what had been reported previously, and interestingly explained a larger 9.8% of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score, a scale of alcohol use disorder. Explanatory capacity in participants from the offspring generation of ARIES measured during adolescence was much lower. However, DNAm-Alc explained 14.3% of the variation in replication using the Head and Neck 5000 (HN5000) clinical cohort that had higher average alcohol consumption. To investigate whether this relationship was being driven by genetic and/or earlier environment confounding, we examined how earlier versus concurrent DNAm-Alc measures predicted AUDIT scores. In both ARIES parental and offspring generations, we observed associations between AUDIT and concurrent, but not earlier DNAm-Alc, suggesting independence from genetic and stable environmental contributions. The stronger relationship between DNAm-Alcs and AUDIT in parents at midlife compared to adolescents despite similar levels of consumption suggests that DNAm-Alc likely reflects long-term patterns of alcohol abuse. Such biomarkers may have potential applications for biomonitoring and risk prediction, especially in cases where reporting bias is a concern.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recently, an alcohol predictor was developed using DNA methylation at 144 CpG sites (DNAm-Alc) as a biomarker for improved clinical or epidemiologic assessment of alcohol-related ill health. We validate the performance and characterise the drivers of this DNAm-Alc for the first time in independent populations.
RESULTS
In N = 1049 parents from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Accessible Resource for Integrated Epigenomic Studies (ARIES) at midlife, we found DNAm-Alc explained 7.6% of the variation in alcohol intake, roughly half of what had been reported previously, and interestingly explained a larger 9.8% of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score, a scale of alcohol use disorder. Explanatory capacity in participants from the offspring generation of ARIES measured during adolescence was much lower. However, DNAm-Alc explained 14.3% of the variation in replication using the Head and Neck 5000 (HN5000) clinical cohort that had higher average alcohol consumption. To investigate whether this relationship was being driven by genetic and/or earlier environment confounding, we examined how earlier versus concurrent DNAm-Alc measures predicted AUDIT scores. In both ARIES parental and offspring generations, we observed associations between AUDIT and concurrent, but not earlier DNAm-Alc, suggesting independence from genetic and stable environmental contributions.
CONCLUSIONS
The stronger relationship between DNAm-Alcs and AUDIT in parents at midlife compared to adolescents despite similar levels of consumption suggests that DNAm-Alc likely reflects long-term patterns of alcohol abuse. Such biomarkers may have potential applications for biomonitoring and risk prediction, especially in cases where reporting bias is a concern.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31775873
doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0753-7
pii: 10.1186/s13148-019-0753-7
pmc: PMC6880546
doi:
Substances chimiques
Genetic Markers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
163Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0707-10034
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0902144
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12013/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_15018
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 19169
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G9815508
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/I025263/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 102215/2/13/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12013/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/I025751/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/5
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Thorax. 2017 Jul;72(7):646-653
pubmed: 28100713
Clin Epigenetics. 2014 Feb 03;6(1):4
pubmed: 24485148
Addict Biol. 2019 Jan;24(1):121-131
pubmed: 29058377
Cereb Cortex. 2001 Jun;11(6):552-7
pubmed: 11375916
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;23(11):2114-2115
pubmed: 28894303
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):375-393
pubmed: 29685825
Biol Methods Protoc. 2016 Dec 27;1(1):1-8
pubmed: 32328532
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):97-110
pubmed: 22507742
Epigenomics. 2011 Dec;3(6):771-84
pubmed: 22126295
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2017 Mar 24;8:1-8
pubmed: 28392719
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Dec;41(6):804-809
pubmed: 26436654
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr 7;98(4):680-96
pubmed: 27040690
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;23(2):422-433
pubmed: 27843151
Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804
pubmed: 8329970
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1181-90
pubmed: 25991711
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 May 08;13:86
pubmed: 22568884
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Feb;2(1):73-80
pubmed: 20031568
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Dec 7;101(6):888-902
pubmed: 29198723
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 May;42(5):845-848
pubmed: 29532481
Lancet. 2009 Jun 27;373(9682):2223-33
pubmed: 19560604
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Oct;9(5):436-447
pubmed: 27651444
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):111-27
pubmed: 22507743
J Investig Med. 2016 Jun;64(5):1006-11
pubmed: 27001945
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1120-1130
pubmed: 29860346
Nature. 2017 Jan 5;541(7635):81-86
pubmed: 28002404
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Genome Biol. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):207
pubmed: 27717397
Epigenetics. 2016 May 3;11(5):354-62
pubmed: 27019159
Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 1;34(23):3983-3989
pubmed: 29931280
Genome Biol. 2014 Dec 03;15(12):503
pubmed: 25599564
Cell. 2016 Aug 11;166(4):822-839
pubmed: 27518561
BMC Cancer. 2014 Dec 17;14:973
pubmed: 25519023
Genome Biol. 2016 Mar 31;17:61
pubmed: 27036880
Genome Biol. 2014 Feb 04;15(2):R31
pubmed: 24495553
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 06;13:47
pubmed: 25858476