A comparative metabolomics analysis of the components of heartwood and sapwood in Taxus chinensis (Pilger) Rehd.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 11 2019
27 11 2019
Historique:
received:
20
05
2019
accepted:
31
10
2019
entrez:
29
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
26
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Taxus chinensis is a well-known gymnosperm with great ornamental and medicinal value. Its purple red brown heartwood (HW) has many attributes such as straight texture, high density, mechanical strength, rich elasticity and corrosion resistance that is highly prized commercially. T. chinensis sapwood (SW), in comparison, lacks these important traits. At present, little is known about the differences of metabolites between the SW and HW in T. chinensis. Widely targeted metabolic profiling was performed to analyze the metabolic profiles of HW and SW in T. chinensis using Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry (LC-EI-MS). A total of 607 metabolites were detected in HW and SW. Among them, 146 metabolites were significantly higher, and 167 metabolites significantly lower, in HW as compared to SW. These differential metabolites were mainly involved in metabolic pathways and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, flavone and flavonol, phenylpropanoids and antibiotics. Moreover, 71 flavonoids and isoflavones were found to be significantly different between HW and SW. Our results show the difference of components between the HW and SW, which has potential significance to further elucidate the mechanism of HW color formation. The results will provide insight into the metabolites associated with wood color formation and useful information for understanding the metabolites associated with wood quality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31776382
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53839-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-53839-2
pmc: PMC6881444
doi:
Substances chimiques
Flavonoids
0
Isoflavones
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17647Références
Tree Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;38(3):311-319
pubmed: 28633414
J Sep Sci. 2004 Feb;27(3):209-16
pubmed: 15334908
Cell. 2018 Jan 11;172(1-2):249-261.e12
pubmed: 29328914
Mol Ecol. 2016 Feb;25(4):959-76
pubmed: 26756581
J Exp Bot. 2014 Apr;65(7):1829-48
pubmed: 24453225
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D353-D361
pubmed: 27899662
Nature. 1994 Feb 17;367(6464):593-4
pubmed: 7906393
Plant Physiol. 2006 Aug;141(4):1205-18
pubmed: 16896233
J Mass Spectrom. 2010 Jul;45(7):703-14
pubmed: 20623627
Food Chem. 2016 May 15;199:8-17
pubmed: 26775938
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2009 Dec;45(6):619-629
pubmed: 19936031
Molecules. 2018 Aug 20;23(8):
pubmed: 30127238
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 24;6:35505
pubmed: 27775091
J Nat Prod. 1993 Oct;56(10):1657-68
pubmed: 7903979
J Proteome Res. 2015 Aug 7;14(8):3322-35
pubmed: 26088811
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2015 Feb;26(1):30-4
pubmed: 25551800
Ther Drug Monit. 2005 Dec;27(6):747-51
pubmed: 16404815
Nat Prod Commun. 2015 Mar;10(3):505-12
pubmed: 25924540
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;20(6):557-8
pubmed: 12042854
Magn Reson Chem. 2019 Jun;57(6):326-330
pubmed: 30729589
Biomed Chromatogr. 2012 Oct;26(10):1269-75
pubmed: 22275146
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 14;12(6):e0179268
pubmed: 28614371
Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 Feb;53(2):e1
pubmed: 22123792
Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):484-9
pubmed: 16439654
J Am Chem Soc. 1971 May 5;93(9):2325-7
pubmed: 5553076
Molecules. 2018 May 15;23(5):
pubmed: 29762486
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D801-7
pubmed: 23161693
Science. 1976 Feb 20;191(4228):773-6
pubmed: 17754175
Mol Plant. 2010 Jan;3(1):2-20
pubmed: 20035037
Nature. 1979 Feb 22;277(5698):665-7
pubmed: 423966
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Jun;8(3):249-53
pubmed: 15860421
Anal Chem. 2010 May 15;82(10):4165-73
pubmed: 20405949