Sinorhizobium meliloti succinylated high-molecular-weight succinoglycan and the Medicago truncatula LysM receptor-like kinase MtLYK10 participate independently in symbiotic infection.
Medicago truncatula
Sinorhizobium meliloti
LysM-receptor-like kinase
beneficial microbes
exopolysaccharide
infection thread
microbiome
root hair
succinoglycan
symbiotic nitrogen fixation
Journal
The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology
ISSN: 1365-313X
Titre abrégé: Plant J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207397
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
29
07
2019
revised:
08
11
2019
accepted:
19
11
2019
pubmed:
30
11
2019
medline:
18
2
2021
entrez:
30
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules on legume hosts is a finely tuned process involving many components of both symbiotic partners. Production of the exopolysaccharide succinoglycan by the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 is needed for an effective symbiosis with Medicago spp., and the succinyl modification to this polysaccharide is critical. However, it is not known when succinoglycan intervenes in the symbiotic process, and it is not known whether the plant lysin-motif receptor-like kinase MtLYK10 intervenes in recognition of succinoglycan, as might be inferred from work on the Lotus japonicus MtLYK10 ortholog, LjEPR3. We studied the symbiotic infection phenotypes of S. meliloti mutants deficient in succinoglycan production or producing modified succinoglycan, in wild-type Medicago truncatula plants and in Mtlyk10 mutant plants. On wild-type plants, S. meliloti strains producing no succinoglycan or only unsuccinylated succinoglycan still induced nodule primordia and epidermal infections, but further progression of the symbiotic process was blocked. These S. meliloti mutants induced a more severe infection phenotype on Mtlyk10 mutant plants. Nodulation by succinoglycan-defective strains was achieved by in trans rescue with a Nod factor-deficient S. meliloti mutant. While the Nod factor-deficient strain was always more abundant inside nodules, the succinoglycan-deficient strain was more efficient than the strain producing only unsuccinylated succinoglycan. Together, these data show that succinylated succinoglycan is essential for infection thread formation in M. truncatula, and that MtLYK10 plays an important, but different role in this symbiotic process. These data also suggest that succinoglycan is more important than Nod factors for bacterial survival inside nodules.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31782853
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14625
pmc: PMC9327734
doi:
Substances chimiques
Plant Proteins
0
Polysaccharides, Bacterial
0
succinoglycan
73667-50-2
Phosphotransferases
EC 2.7.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
311-326Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. The Plant Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Plant Physiol. 2019 Apr;179(4):1704-1722
pubmed: 30710053
Plant Physiol. 1974 Oct;54(4):443-9
pubmed: 16658907
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 15;115(20):E4700-E4709
pubmed: 29717040
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1988 Feb;1(2):94-100
pubmed: 2979704
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 04;9:923
pubmed: 30022986
J Bacteriol. 1994 Apr;176(7):1997-2002
pubmed: 8144468
Cell. 1987 Nov 20;51(4):579-87
pubmed: 2824062
Development. 2014 Sep;141(18):3517-28
pubmed: 25183870
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2016 Mar;29(3):210-9
pubmed: 26713350
J Bacteriol. 1985 May;162(2):469-76
pubmed: 2985535
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013 Mar;26(3):319-29
pubmed: 23134480
Plant Physiol. 2016 Jul;171(3):2256-76
pubmed: 27217496
Plant J. 2003 Apr;34(1):95-106
pubmed: 12662312
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 07;7:794
pubmed: 27375649
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Sep;82(18):6231-5
pubmed: 3862129
Arch Microbiol. 2012 Feb;194(2):87-102
pubmed: 21761170
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006 Jan;19(1):43-52
pubmed: 16404952
J Bacteriol. 2005 Jan;187(1):376-81
pubmed: 15601722
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8636-41
pubmed: 8710923
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Jun;68(2):280-300
pubmed: 15187185
J Bacteriol. 2012 Aug;194(16):4322-31
pubmed: 22685282
J Bacteriol. 1982 Jan;149(1):114-22
pubmed: 6274841
Plant Physiol. 1992 Jan;98(1):143-51
pubmed: 16668605
J Vis Exp. 2013 Oct 01;(80):
pubmed: 24121837
Mol Reprod Dev. 2015 Jul-Aug;82(7-8):518-29
pubmed: 26153368
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2015;316:111-58
pubmed: 25805123
J Bacteriol. 2000 Aug;182(15):4310-8
pubmed: 10894742
Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Aug 26;13(16):5965-76
pubmed: 2994020
Plant Physiol. 2015 Apr;167(4):1233-42
pubmed: 25659382
New Phytol. 2016 Jul;211(2):411-7
pubmed: 27241115
Mol Microbiol. 1997 Jul;25(1):117-34
pubmed: 11902715
J Bacteriol. 1998 Oct;180(19):5183-91
pubmed: 9748453
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
mBio. 2016 Jun 21;7(3):
pubmed: 27329751
J Bacteriol. 2013 Dec;195(23):5362-9
pubmed: 24078609
Plant Cell. 2014 Dec;26(12):4680-701
pubmed: 25527707
Plant Physiol. 2008 Dec;148(4):1985-95
pubmed: 18931145
New Phytol. 2019 Aug;223(3):1516-1529
pubmed: 31058335
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 10;95(23):13477-82
pubmed: 9811825
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 9;114(19):5041-5046
pubmed: 28438996
Nature. 2015 Jul 16;523(7560):308-12
pubmed: 26153863
Plant J. 2014 Mar;77(6):817-37
pubmed: 24483147
Plant Mol Biol. 2005 Aug;58(6):809-822
pubmed: 16240175
Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:503-35
pubmed: 8811188
Plant Physiol. 2006 Sep;142(1):265-79
pubmed: 16844829
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003 Mar;16(3):217-25
pubmed: 12650453
J Bacteriol. 1998 Aug;180(16):4184-91
pubmed: 9696768
Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:119-44
pubmed: 21838550
Plant Physiol. 2015 Sep;169(1):233-65
pubmed: 26175514
New Phytol. 2014 Feb;201(3):1065-1076
pubmed: 24206427
Plant Physiol. 2007 Sep;145(1):183-91
pubmed: 17586690
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1992 Sep-Oct;5(5):439-42
pubmed: 1472720
Nature. 1990 Apr 19;344(6268):781-4
pubmed: 2330031
Mol Microbiol. 2002 Mar;43(5):1115-27
pubmed: 11918800
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013 Sep;26(9):1089-105
pubmed: 23656330
Development. 1999 Aug;126(16):3617-28
pubmed: 10409507
J Bacteriol. 1990 Aug;172(8):4295-306
pubmed: 2376562
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011 Jun;24(6):631-9
pubmed: 21542766
Mol Plant. 2015 Aug;8(8):1213-26
pubmed: 25804975
Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):661-72
pubmed: 2537152
Plant J. 2008 Apr;54(2):335-47
pubmed: 18208518
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1993 Nov-Dec;6(6):735-44
pubmed: 8118055
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):704-9
pubmed: 18184805
Cell. 1993 Jul 30;74(2):269-80
pubmed: 8343955
Science. 1986 Aug 29;233(4767):977-80
pubmed: 3738520
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017 Dec;30(12):1009-1019
pubmed: 28871850
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Aug;5(8):619-33
pubmed: 17632573
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Oct 24;9:1531
pubmed: 30405668
J Bacteriol. 2018 Jun 11;200(13):
pubmed: 29632097