Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics.
Phantoms
X-ray computed tomography
artificial intelligence
imaging
machine learning
neural networks
Journal
Academic radiology
ISSN: 1878-4046
Titre abrégé: Acad Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9440159
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
06
05
2019
revised:
21
06
2019
accepted:
08
09
2019
entrez:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
11
12
2019
medline:
4
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Noise, commonly encountered on computed tomography (CT) images, can impact diagnostic accuracy. To reduce the image noise, we developed a deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) method that integrates deep convolutional neural networks into image reconstruction. In this phantom study, we compared the image noise characteristics, spatial resolution, and task-based detectability on DLR images and images reconstructed with other state-of-the art techniques. We scanned a phantom harboring cylindrical modules with different contrast on a 320-row detector CT scanner. Phantom images were reconstructed with filtered back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, model-based iterative reconstruction, and DLR. The standard deviation of the CT number and the noise power spectrum were calculated for noise characterization. The 10% modulation-transfer function (MTF) level was used to evaluate spatial resolution; task-based detectability was assessed using the model observer method. On images reconstructed with DLR, the noise was lower than on images subjected to other reconstructions, especially at low radiation dose settings. Noise power spectrum measurements also showed that the noise amplitude was lower, especially for low-frequency components, on DLR images. Based on the MTF, spatial resolution was higher on model-based iterative reconstruction image than DLR image, however, for lower-contrast objects, the MTF on DLR images was comparable to images reconstructed with other methods. The machine observer study showed that at reduced radiation-dose settings, DLR yielded the best detectability. On DLR images, the image noise was lower, and high-contrast spatial resolution and task-based detectability were better than on images reconstructed with other state-of-the art techniques. DLR also outperformed other methods with respect to task-based detectability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31818389
pii: S1076-6332(19)30434-9
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
82-87Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.