Patient and family engagement in communicating with electronic medical records in hospitals: A systematic review.


Journal

International journal of medical informatics
ISSN: 1872-8243
Titre abrégé: Int J Med Inform
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9711057

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
received: 21 05 2019
revised: 14 11 2019
accepted: 25 11 2019
pubmed: 14 12 2019
medline: 26 3 2020
entrez: 14 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Use of electronic medical records (EMRs) in hospitals affects how individuals communicate with each other. To examine how EMRs mediate communication between inpatients, their families, and health professionals to support patient and family engagement in care. The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched for relevant studies: Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library, CINAHL, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, and EMBASE. The search identified 850 papers, and of these, 32 met the inclusion criteria. Interactions with the EMR tended to be unidirectional in nature, where health professionals consulted with patients and families to update patient information. Engagement rarely extended to facilitating patient and family participation beyond consultation. There were few examples of patient and family partnership and shared leadership, mainly with secure messaging and use of the patient portal. Strategies that worked in facilitating active engagement involved patients and families employing creative means of gathering information and directing this information to health professionals. Use of such strategies were rare and involved the attributes of particular individuals, rather than considering the inherent culture of clinical settings. Further research is urgently needed to examine possibilities of patient and family involvement in treatment modalities, and partnership and shared governance in using the EMR.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Use of electronic medical records (EMRs) in hospitals affects how individuals communicate with each other.
OBJECTIVE
To examine how EMRs mediate communication between inpatients, their families, and health professionals to support patient and family engagement in care.
METHODS
The following electronic bibliographic databases were searched for relevant studies: Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library, CINAHL, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, and EMBASE.
RESULTS
The search identified 850 papers, and of these, 32 met the inclusion criteria. Interactions with the EMR tended to be unidirectional in nature, where health professionals consulted with patients and families to update patient information. Engagement rarely extended to facilitating patient and family participation beyond consultation. There were few examples of patient and family partnership and shared leadership, mainly with secure messaging and use of the patient portal. Strategies that worked in facilitating active engagement involved patients and families employing creative means of gathering information and directing this information to health professionals. Use of such strategies were rare and involved the attributes of particular individuals, rather than considering the inherent culture of clinical settings.
CONCLUSION
Further research is urgently needed to examine possibilities of patient and family involvement in treatment modalities, and partnership and shared governance in using the EMR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31835159
pii: S1386-5056(19)30566-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104036
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104036

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Elizabeth Manias (E)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, Australia 3125. Electronic address: emanias@deakin.edu.au.

Tracey Bucknall (T)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, Australia 3125; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Alfred Health Partnership, Alfred Health, Commercial Road, Prahran, Victoria, Australia, 3181. Electronic address: tracey.bucknall@deakin.edu.au.

Nilmini Wickramasinghe (N)

Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Victoria Australia, 3122. Electronic address: nilmini.work@gmail.com.

Kathleen Gray (K)

Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville Victoria Australia, 3010. Electronic address: kgray@unimelb.edu.au.

Jonathan Schaffer (J)

Center for Joint Replacement, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio USA, 44195. Electronic address: SCHAFFJ@ccf.org.

Ellie Rosenfeld (E)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, Australia 3125. Electronic address: mimi7@westnet.com.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH