Barriers in the Decision Making About and Performance of Continuous Sedation Until Death in Nursing Homes.


Journal

The Gerontologist
ISSN: 1758-5341
Titre abrégé: Gerontologist
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375327

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 07 2020
Historique:
received: 12 09 2019
pubmed: 19 12 2019
medline: 18 11 2020
entrez: 19 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

While decision making about and performance of continuous sedation involve many challenges, they appear to be particularly pervasive in nursing homes. This study aims to identify barriers to the decision making and performance of continuous sedation until death in Flemish nursing homes as experienced by the health care professionals involved. Ten focus groups were held with 71 health care professionals including 16 palliative care physicians, 42 general practitioners, and 13 nursing home staff. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a constant comparative approach. Perceived barriers concerned factors prior to and during sedation and were classified according to three types: (a) personal barriers related to knowledge and skills including the lack of clarity on what continuous sedation should be used for (linguistic ambiguity) and when and how it should be used (practical ambiguity); (b) relational barriers concerning communication and collaboration both between health care professionals and with family; (c) organizational barriers related to the organization of care in nursing homes where, for example, there is no on-site physician, or where the recommended medication is not always available. The findings suggest there are considerable challenges for sound decision making about and performance of continuous sedation until death in nursing homes. There is a need for multicomponent initiatives that provide guidance in the context of the complexity of a resident's medical situation, the family, and the specific organization of care, which would have the potential to facilitate and improve the decision-making process and performance of continuous sedation in nursing homes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
While decision making about and performance of continuous sedation involve many challenges, they appear to be particularly pervasive in nursing homes. This study aims to identify barriers to the decision making and performance of continuous sedation until death in Flemish nursing homes as experienced by the health care professionals involved.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Ten focus groups were held with 71 health care professionals including 16 palliative care physicians, 42 general practitioners, and 13 nursing home staff. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a constant comparative approach.
RESULTS
Perceived barriers concerned factors prior to and during sedation and were classified according to three types: (a) personal barriers related to knowledge and skills including the lack of clarity on what continuous sedation should be used for (linguistic ambiguity) and when and how it should be used (practical ambiguity); (b) relational barriers concerning communication and collaboration both between health care professionals and with family; (c) organizational barriers related to the organization of care in nursing homes where, for example, there is no on-site physician, or where the recommended medication is not always available.
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS
The findings suggest there are considerable challenges for sound decision making about and performance of continuous sedation until death in nursing homes. There is a need for multicomponent initiatives that provide guidance in the context of the complexity of a resident's medical situation, the family, and the specific organization of care, which would have the potential to facilitate and improve the decision-making process and performance of continuous sedation in nursing homes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31850500
pii: 5680243
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz165
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

916-925

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Lenzo Robijn (L)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Belgium.
Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium.

Luc Deliens (L)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Belgium.
Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium.

Judith Rietjens (J)

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Peter Pype (P)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium.

Kenneth Chambaere (K)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Belgium.
Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH