Novel human sex-typing strategies based on the autism candidate gene NLGN4X and its male-specific gametologue NLGN4Y.
Amelogenin
Chromosomes
Neuroligin-4
rhAMP genotyping
sex-typing
Journal
Biology of sex differences
ISSN: 2042-6410
Titre abrégé: Biol Sex Differ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101548963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 12 2019
18 12 2019
Historique:
received:
21
10
2019
accepted:
09
12
2019
entrez:
20
12
2019
pubmed:
20
12
2019
medline:
29
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since the early days of PCR techniques, sex identification, "sex-typing," of genomic DNA samples has been a fundamental part of human forensic analysis but also in animal genetics aiming at strategic livestock breeding. Most analyses are employing the AMELX/AMELY gene loci on the X and Y chromosomes present in most mammals. We hypothesize that sex-typing in humans is also possible based on the genes NLGN4X and NLGN4Y, which represent X and Y chromosome-specific copies of a common ancestral neuroligin-4 orthologue. Genomic DNA was isolated from human blood and buccal cell samples (total n = 111) and submitted to two different strategies: (a) a traditional two-primer PCR approach detecting an insertion/deletion (indel) polymorphism immediately upstream of the translational start on exon 1 and (b) detection of a single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP, on the translational stop carrying exon 7. The SNP detection was based on a quantitative PCR approach (rhAMP genotyping) employing DNA/RNA hybrid oligonucleotides that were blocked and which could only be activated upon perfect annealing to the target DNA sequence. All indel PCR-tested human DNA samples showed two bands for males representing X- and Y-specific copies of NLGN4 and a single band for female samples, i.e., homozygosity of NLGN4X and absence of NLGN4Y, in accordance with the self-reported sex of the donors. These results were in perfect agreement with the results of the rhAMP-based SNP-detection method: all males were consequently positive for both alleles, representing either SNP variant, and females were interpreted as homozygous regarding the SNP variant found in NLGN4X. Both methods have shown reliable and consistent results that enabled us to infer the sex of donor DNA samples across different ethnicities. These results indicate that the detection of human NLGN4X/Y is a suitable alternative to previously reported methods employing gene loci such as AMELX/Y. Furthermore, this is the first report applying successfully the rhAMP-genotyping strategy as a means for SNP-based sex-typing, which consequently will be applicable to other gene loci or different species as well.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Since the early days of PCR techniques, sex identification, "sex-typing," of genomic DNA samples has been a fundamental part of human forensic analysis but also in animal genetics aiming at strategic livestock breeding. Most analyses are employing the AMELX/AMELY gene loci on the X and Y chromosomes present in most mammals. We hypothesize that sex-typing in humans is also possible based on the genes NLGN4X and NLGN4Y, which represent X and Y chromosome-specific copies of a common ancestral neuroligin-4 orthologue.
METHODS
Genomic DNA was isolated from human blood and buccal cell samples (total n = 111) and submitted to two different strategies: (a) a traditional two-primer PCR approach detecting an insertion/deletion (indel) polymorphism immediately upstream of the translational start on exon 1 and (b) detection of a single nucleotide polymorphism, SNP, on the translational stop carrying exon 7. The SNP detection was based on a quantitative PCR approach (rhAMP genotyping) employing DNA/RNA hybrid oligonucleotides that were blocked and which could only be activated upon perfect annealing to the target DNA sequence.
RESULTS
All indel PCR-tested human DNA samples showed two bands for males representing X- and Y-specific copies of NLGN4 and a single band for female samples, i.e., homozygosity of NLGN4X and absence of NLGN4Y, in accordance with the self-reported sex of the donors. These results were in perfect agreement with the results of the rhAMP-based SNP-detection method: all males were consequently positive for both alleles, representing either SNP variant, and females were interpreted as homozygous regarding the SNP variant found in NLGN4X. Both methods have shown reliable and consistent results that enabled us to infer the sex of donor DNA samples across different ethnicities.
CONCLUSIONS
These results indicate that the detection of human NLGN4X/Y is a suitable alternative to previously reported methods employing gene loci such as AMELX/Y. Furthermore, this is the first report applying successfully the rhAMP-genotyping strategy as a means for SNP-based sex-typing, which consequently will be applicable to other gene loci or different species as well.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31852540
doi: 10.1186/s13293-019-0279-x
pii: 10.1186/s13293-019-0279-x
pmc: PMC6921425
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal
0
NLGN4X protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
62Références
Arch Med Res. 2001 Nov-Dec;32(6):559-66
pubmed: 11750731
Eur J Med Genet. 2008 Jan-Feb;51(1):68-73
pubmed: 18194880
Int J Legal Med. 1994;106(4):190-3
pubmed: 8038111
Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):240-4
pubmed: 1695712
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018 Jun 15;468:3-10
pubmed: 29635012
Genomics. 1991 Feb;9(2):264-9
pubmed: 2004775
BMC Genet. 2005 Mar 16;6:16
pubmed: 15771775
Plant Methods. 2018 Mar 28;14:28
pubmed: 29610576
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;147:355-376
pubmed: 29325624
Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Apr;146(1-2):34-41
pubmed: 24598214
Hum Mol Genet. 1993 Aug;2(8):1187-91
pubmed: 8401500
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5258-63
pubmed: 12672962
Anim Genet. 2013 Aug;44(5):606
pubmed: 23848192
BMC Biotechnol. 2011 Aug 10;11:80
pubmed: 21831278
Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):245-50
pubmed: 2374589
Eur J Hum Genet. 2008 May;16(5):614-8
pubmed: 18231125
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 29;105(17):6421-6
pubmed: 18434543
Forensic Sci Int. 1991 Jan-Feb;49(1):81-8
pubmed: 2032670
Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 Nov;75(11):1662-8
pubmed: 18384076
Biotechniques. 1993 Oct;15(4):636-8, 640-1
pubmed: 8251166
Nature. 2008 Oct 16;455(7215):903-11
pubmed: 18923512
Int J Evol Biol. 2012;2012:917678
pubmed: 22779033
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184087
pubmed: 28886064
Nat Genet. 2003 May;34(1):27-9
pubmed: 12669065
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921
pubmed: 11237011
J Vet Med Sci. 2000 Oct;62(10):1109-10
pubmed: 11073085
J Biol Chem. 2014 Jan 3;289(1):387-402
pubmed: 24273166
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Jan;17(1):33-46
pubmed: 26616198
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;147(2-3):81-94
pubmed: 26730606