Effects of Pharmacotherapy Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Narcolepsy and Idiopathic Hypersomnia Cohort.
Adult
Central Nervous System Stimulants
/ therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
/ therapeutic use
Idiopathic Hypersomnia
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Narcolepsy
/ drug therapy
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Polysomnography
Retrospective Studies
Sodium Oxybate
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
CNS hypersomnias
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
idiopathic hypersomnia
narcolepsy
patient- reported outcomes
standardized dose
Journal
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
ISSN: 1550-9397
Titre abrégé: J Clin Sleep Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 12 2019
15 12 2019
Historique:
entrez:
20
12
2019
pubmed:
20
12
2019
medline:
23
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the association between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and treatment regimen/standardized dose (STD), a measure of drug burden, in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1)/type 2 (NT2) and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). Patients age 18 years or older with NT1/NT2 and IH with baseline and ≥ 6-month follow-up during 2008-2010 were included. Changes in PROs (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS], Fatigue Severity Scale [FSS], Patient Health Questionnaire 9 [PHQ-9], total sleep time [TST]) by diagnosis, treatment regimen (monotherapy versus polytherapy, sodium oxybate [SO] use), and STD were assessed by t tests and univariable/multivariable linear regressions, adjusting for patient characteristics. A total of 92 patients (26 [28.3%] NT1, 27 [29.3%] NT2, 39 [42.4%] IH) were included (age 43.8 ± 14.8 years; 66 [71.7%] female). Baseline PROs suggested excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS 14.2 ± 5.2 [74% patients > 10]), significant fatigue (FSS 47.5 ± 12.9), and mild depression (PHQ-9 9.0 [4.0, 14.0] [49.4% ≥ 10]). At follow-up, ESS and PHQ-9 improved significantly overall and within diagnostic, monotherapy/polytherapy, and SO use groups (all P < .01). FSS improved significantly overall (P = .016), but improvements were not significant for IH, monotherapy, polytherapy, and non-SO using groups. In multivariable models, PRO changes were not significantly different between groups, but baseline STD was associated with worsening PHQ-9 across PHQ-9 change models, and ESS worsened with increasing STD at follow-up (P = .056). Significant improvements in sleep-related PROs were seen with pharmacotherapy use, regardless of diagnosis or treatment type, highlighting the importance of individualized prescribing decisions for this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31855165
doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8088
pmc: PMC7099187
doi:
Substances chimiques
Central Nervous System Stimulants
0
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Sodium Oxybate
7G33012534
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1799-1806Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
Références
Drug Saf. 2002;25(11):791-809
pubmed: 12222990
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019 Feb;207(2):84-99
pubmed: 30672873
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Jun;18(8):809-817
pubmed: 28443381
Epilepsia. 1984 Aug;25(4):423-33
pubmed: 6745214
Sleep. 2005 Jun;28(6):667-72
pubmed: 16477952
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;80(6):636-41
pubmed: 19211597
Psychosomatics. 2016 Mar-Apr;57(2):152-64
pubmed: 26895727
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Nov 15;370:29-34
pubmed: 27772778
Sleep. 2018 Sep 1;41(9):
pubmed: 29986085
Rev Neurol. 2017 Oct 1;65(7):289-294
pubmed: 28929470
Sleep. 2006 Jul;29(7):939-46
pubmed: 16895262
Sleep Med Clin. 2017 Sep;12(3):331-344
pubmed: 28778232
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Sep 15;9(9):955-65
pubmed: 23997709
Eur Neurol. 2013;70(1-2):22-6
pubmed: 23689193
Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;110(12):2131-5
pubmed: 10616118
Sleep Med. 2011 Jan;12(1):19-23
pubmed: 20851047
Sleep. 1991 Jun;14(3):218-20
pubmed: 1680245
Sleep Med Clin. 2018 Jun;13(2):183-189
pubmed: 29759269
Sleep Med. 2017 Dec;40:53-57
pubmed: 29221779
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 Feb;19(2):13
pubmed: 28243864
Sleep Sci. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):19-27
pubmed: 28966734
J Sleep Res. 2012 Apr;21(2):163-9
pubmed: 21848801
Sleep Med. 2004 Mar;5(2):119-23
pubmed: 15033130
Sleep. 2007 Dec;30(12):1705-11
pubmed: 18246980
Sleep Med. 2013 Jun;14(6):488-92
pubmed: 23643648
Chest. 2015 Jul;148(1):262-273
pubmed: 26149554
J Sleep Res. 2015 Feb;24(1):74-81
pubmed: 25196321
J Sleep Res. 2019 Jun;28(3):e12689
pubmed: 29624767
Laryngoscope. 2017 Feb;127(2):525-531
pubmed: 27470941
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Apr;20(5):483-486
pubmed: 30592648
Sleep Med. 2017 Jul;35:80-84
pubmed: 28619187
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1194-201
pubmed: 15550799
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 08;7:117
pubmed: 23580360
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 31;373(27):2654-62
pubmed: 26716917
Sleep Med. 2012 Feb;13(2):200-6
pubmed: 22137109
J Neurol Sci. 2013 Aug 15;331(1-2):102-7
pubmed: 23791482
Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5
pubmed: 1798888
Sleep Med. 2016 Jan;17:38-44
pubmed: 26847972
J Sleep Res. 2001 Mar;10(1):75-81
pubmed: 11285058
Ind Psychiatry J. 2016 Jul-Dec;25(2):222-224
pubmed: 28659704
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Sleep Med Clin. 2017 Sep;12(3):461-478
pubmed: 28778242
Sleep Med. 2010 May;11(5):500-1
pubmed: 20133191
Sleep Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):52-8
pubmed: 25533539