Lipoprotein signatures of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and HMG-CoA reductase inhibition.
Adolescent
Adult
Alleles
Apolipoproteins B
/ blood
Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Cholesterol, LDL
/ blood
Cohort Studies
Coronary Disease
/ blood
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genetic Variation
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA Reductases
/ blood
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Lipoproteins
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Triglycerides
/ blood
Young Adult
Journal
PLoS biology
ISSN: 1545-7885
Titre abrégé: PLoS Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101183755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
28
03
2019
accepted:
29
11
2019
revised:
06
01
2020
pubmed:
21
12
2019
medline:
17
3
2020
entrez:
21
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition reduces vascular event risk, but confusion surrounds its effects on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Here, we clarify associations of genetic inhibition of CETP on detailed lipoprotein measures and compare those to genetic inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR). We used an allele associated with lower CETP expression (rs247617) to mimic CETP inhibition and an allele associated with lower HMGCR expression (rs12916) to mimic the well-known effects of statins for comparison. The study consists of 65,427 participants of European ancestries with detailed lipoprotein subclass profiling from nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Genetic associations were scaled to 10% reduction in relative risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We also examined observational associations of the lipoprotein subclass measures with risk of incident CHD in 3 population-based cohorts totalling 616 incident cases and 13,564 controls during 8-year follow-up. Genetic inhibition of CETP and HMGCR resulted in near-identical associations with LDL cholesterol concentration estimated by the Friedewald equation. Inhibition of HMGCR had relatively consistent associations on lower cholesterol concentrations across all apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins. In contrast, the associations of the inhibition of CETP were stronger on lower remnant and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, but there were no associations on cholesterol concentrations in LDL defined by particle size (diameter 18-26 nm) (-0.02 SD LDL defined by particle size; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.05 for CETP versus -0.24 SD, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.18 for HMGCR). Inhibition of CETP was strongly associated with lower proportion of triglycerides in all high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles. In observational analyses, a higher triglyceride composition within HDL subclasses was associated with higher risk of CHD, independently of total cholesterol and triglycerides (strongest hazard ratio per 1 SD higher triglyceride composition in very large HDL 1.35; 95% CI: 1.18-1.54). In conclusion, CETP inhibition does not appear to affect size-specific LDL cholesterol but is likely to lower CHD risk by lowering concentrations of other atherogenic, apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins (such as remnant and VLDLs). Inhibition of CETP also lowers triglyceride composition in HDL particles, a phenomenon reflecting combined effects of circulating HDL, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B-containing particles and is associated with a lower CHD risk in observational analyses. Our results reveal that conventional composite lipid assays may mask heterogeneous effects of emerging lipid-altering therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31860674
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000572
pii: PBIOLOGY-D-19-00874
pmc: PMC6944381
doi:
Substances chimiques
Apolipoproteins B
0
CETP protein, human
0
Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins
0
Cholesterol, LDL
0
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
0
Lipoproteins
0
Triglycerides
0
HMGCR protein, human
EC 1.1.1.-
Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA Reductases
EC 1.1.1.-
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3000572Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0800270
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/18/13/33946
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : CS/13/1/30327
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00011/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR-RP-PG-0310-1004
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12013/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : RL1 MH083268
Pays : United States
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : SP/09/002
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M013138/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M013138/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL087679
Pays : United States
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : BTRU-2014-10024
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/18/23/33512
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17;371(3):203-12
pubmed: 25014686
Nat Genet. 2013 Nov;45(11):1345-52
pubmed: 24097064
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 30;61(17):1777-86
pubmed: 23500273
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;41(1):33-42
pubmed: 21044979
Circulation. 2015 Mar 3;131(9):774-85
pubmed: 25573147
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 1;186(9):1084-1096
pubmed: 29106475
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):438-47
pubmed: 26222559
Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):580-5
pubmed: 23715323
JAMA. 2008 Jun 18;299(23):2777-88
pubmed: 18560005
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):492-9
pubmed: 16458126
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1220-6
pubmed: 18263651
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):947-956
pubmed: 28846118
Clin Chem. 2002 Feb;48(2):236-54
pubmed: 11805004
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 29;367(22):2089-99
pubmed: 23126252
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1933-1942
pubmed: 28514624
Eur Heart J. 2015 Mar 1;36(9):539-50
pubmed: 24474739
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015 Feb;8(1):192-206
pubmed: 25691689
Nat Genet. 2013 Nov;45(11):1274-1283
pubmed: 24097068
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1289-97
pubmed: 27673306
Phys Rev Lett. 1994 Jun 20;72(25):4049-4052
pubmed: 10056366
Lancet. 2015 Jan 24;385(9965):351-61
pubmed: 25262344
J Intern Med. 2012 Dec;272(6):562-72
pubmed: 22650159
Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502
pubmed: 4337382
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2387-97
pubmed: 26039521
Analyst. 2009 Sep;134(9):1781-5
pubmed: 19684899
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):1713-1722
pubmed: 28304224
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2017 Aug;28(4):300-307
pubmed: 28548974
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 21;69(7):823-836
pubmed: 28209224
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2061-8
pubmed: 24240933
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;92(5):1031-9
pubmed: 20861176
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2532-2561
pubmed: 27616593
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):635-636
pubmed: 28980665
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Apr;100(4):310-5
pubmed: 8494831
Nat Genet. 2012 Jan 29;44(3):269-76
pubmed: 22286219
Nat Genet. 2009 Jan;41(1):35-46
pubmed: 19060910
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1121-1130
pubmed: 26343387
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Jun;25(3):539-46
pubmed: 25422363
Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):572-80
pubmed: 22607825
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;67(10):1200-1210
pubmed: 26965542
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;1(6):692-9
pubmed: 27487401
Ann Med. 2009;41(6):451-61
pubmed: 19412820
Chem Phys Lipids. 2008 Sep;155(1):57-62
pubmed: 18611396
Trials. 2014 Sep 17;15:363
pubmed: 25230735
Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Dec 21;6:441
pubmed: 21179014
Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Mar 15;21(6):1444-55
pubmed: 22156771
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 23;7:11122
pubmed: 27005778
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Jun;9(3):231-9
pubmed: 27114411
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 28;377(13):1217-1227
pubmed: 28847206
Science. 2001 May 11;292(5519):1160-4
pubmed: 11349148