Comparing the effects of milrinone and olprinone in patients with congestive heart failure.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiotonic Agents
/ adverse effects
Disease Progression
Female
Heart Failure
/ diagnosis
Hospitalization
Humans
Imidazoles
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Milrinone
/ adverse effects
Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Progression-Free Survival
Pyridones
/ adverse effects
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Chronic kidney disease
Heart failure
Ischemic heart disease
Phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor
Journal
Heart and vessels
ISSN: 1615-2573
Titre abrégé: Heart Vessels
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8511258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
08
05
2019
accepted:
13
12
2019
pubmed:
23
12
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
23
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Phosphodiesterase-3 (PDE3) inhibitors are widely used among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, no studies have compared the cardiovascular outcomes between different PDE3 inhibitors in CHF management. In this report, we retrospectively compared the clinical benefits of two PDE3 inhibitors, milrinone and olprinone, to determine which better controls the progression of CHF. A total of 288 hospitalized patients who received PDE3 inhibitors [(milrinone; n = 77 and olprinone; n = 211, respectively)] for CHF were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was defined as having a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) or cardiac death by day 60. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional models were used to compare the outcomes for patients treated with milrinone and olprinone. We found no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. In patients treated with milrinone, a greater incidence of a MACCE or cardiac death was observed (log rank; P = 0.005 and P = 0.01, respectively). Milrinone-treated patients with ischemic heart disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at stage ≥ 4 presented with greater incidence of MACCE (log rank; P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). Similarly, these patients were significantly more likely to succumb to cardiac death (log rank; P < 0.001 and P = 0.02). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models demonstrated that milrinone treatment was an independent predictor of MACCE [hazard ratio (HR) 3.17; 95% CI 1.64-6.10] and cardiac death (HR 2.64; 95% CI 1.42-4.91). Oral administration of a β-blocker at discharge occurred more often in the olprinone-treated patients than in the milrinone-treated patients (63% vs. 29%, P = 0.004). We compared the outcomes of milrinone and olprinone treatment in patients with CHF. Those treated with milrinone were more likely to succumb to a MACCE or cardiac death within 60 days of treatment, which was especially true for patients with ischemic heart disease or CKD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31865433
doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01543-6
pii: 10.1007/s00380-019-01543-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiotonic Agents
0
Imidazoles
0
Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors
0
Pyridones
0
olprinone
4Y8BMI9YGC
Milrinone
JU9YAX04C7
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM