Trial of labor after cesarean and contribution of pelvimetry in the prognosis of neonatal morbidity.

To estimate the association between an abnormal pelvic dimension at pelvimetry and the occurrence of severe neonatal morbidity after trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). Retrospective observational cases-controls study conducted at a level 3 maternity units between 2006 and 2016. Included women were patient with trial of labor after one previous cesarean section, alive singleton fetus in cephalic presentation ≥ 37WG. Two groups were compared according to pelvic mesures at pelvimetry: pelvic dimension considered as abnormal, defined by Conjugate Diameter <10.5cm and/or Transverse Diameter <12cm and pelvic dimension considered as normal for other women. The primary outcome was a composite criterion of neonatal morbidity and mortality. A logistic multivariate regression model was use to estimate the association between an abnormal pelvic dimension at pelvimetry and the occurrence of severe neonatal morbidity. 2474 women were included. 863 (34.8 %) have a normal pelvic dimension and 1611 (65.2 %) an abnormal. Characteristics of labor were similar in two groups. Success of TOLAC was 84.7 % in normal pelvic group and 64.6 % in abnormal dimension of pelvic group. Neonatal morbidity was similar between two groups (1.7 % in normal pelvic dimension group versus 2.3 % in abnormal pelvic dimension group, p=0.26; crude OR: 1.39 (0.77-2.49) ; adjusted OR : 0.93 (0.51-1.68)). There were no association between pelvic dimension at pelvimetry and neonatal morbidity. In case of abnormal pelvic dimension, a combination of more prudence, and stringent user practices, achieve a high rate of vaginal delivery and a neonatal morbidity comparable to the normal pelvic dimension group.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest.