Development and characterization of an EMS-mutagenized wheat population and identification of salt-tolerant wheat lines.
Bangladesh
EMS
Mutagenized population
Mutant frequency
Salt
Screening
Tolerance
Wheat
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2020
13 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
16
06
2019
accepted:
13
11
2019
entrez:
15
1
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2020
medline:
6
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Triticum aestivum (wheat) is one of the world's oldest crops and has been used for >8000 years as a food crop in North Africa, West Asia and Europe. Today, wheat is one of the most important sources of grain for humans, and is cultivated on greater areas of land than any other crop. As the human population increases and soil salinity becomes more prevalent, there is increased pressure on wheat breeders to develop salt-tolerant varieties in order to meet growing demands for yield and grain quality. Here we developed a mutant wheat population using the moderately salt-tolerant Bangladeshi variety BARI Gom-25, with the primary goal of further increasing salt tolerance. After titrating the optimal ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) concentration, ca 30,000 seeds were treated with 1% EMS, and 1676 lines, all originating from single seeds, survived through the first four generations. Most mutagenized lines showed a similar phenotype to BARI Gom-25, although visual differences such as dwarfing, giant plants, early and late flowering and altered leaf morphology were seen in some lines. By developing an assay for salt tolerance, and by screening the mutagenized population, we identified 70 lines exhibiting increased salt tolerance. The selected lines typically showed a 70% germination rate on filter paper soaked in 200 mM NaCl, compared to 0-30% for BARI Gom-25. From two of the salt-tolerant OlsAro lines (OA42 and OA70), genomic DNA was sequenced to 15x times coverage. A comparative analysis against the BARI Gom-25 genomic sequence identified a total of 683,201 (OA42), and 768,954 (OA70) SNPs distributed throughout the three sub-genomes (A, B and D). The mutation frequency was determined to be approximately one per 20,000 bp. All the 70 selected salt-tolerant lines were tested for root growth in the laboratory, and under saline field conditions in Bangladesh. The results showed that all the lines selected for tolerance showed a better salt tolerance phenotype than both BARI Gom-25 and other local wheat varieties tested. The mutant wheat population developed here will be a valuable resource in the development of novel salt-tolerant varieties for the benefit of saline farming.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Triticum aestivum (wheat) is one of the world's oldest crops and has been used for >8000 years as a food crop in North Africa, West Asia and Europe. Today, wheat is one of the most important sources of grain for humans, and is cultivated on greater areas of land than any other crop. As the human population increases and soil salinity becomes more prevalent, there is increased pressure on wheat breeders to develop salt-tolerant varieties in order to meet growing demands for yield and grain quality. Here we developed a mutant wheat population using the moderately salt-tolerant Bangladeshi variety BARI Gom-25, with the primary goal of further increasing salt tolerance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After titrating the optimal ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) concentration, ca 30,000 seeds were treated with 1% EMS, and 1676 lines, all originating from single seeds, survived through the first four generations. Most mutagenized lines showed a similar phenotype to BARI Gom-25, although visual differences such as dwarfing, giant plants, early and late flowering and altered leaf morphology were seen in some lines. By developing an assay for salt tolerance, and by screening the mutagenized population, we identified 70 lines exhibiting increased salt tolerance. The selected lines typically showed a 70% germination rate on filter paper soaked in 200 mM NaCl, compared to 0-30% for BARI Gom-25. From two of the salt-tolerant OlsAro lines (OA42 and OA70), genomic DNA was sequenced to 15x times coverage. A comparative analysis against the BARI Gom-25 genomic sequence identified a total of 683,201 (OA42), and 768,954 (OA70) SNPs distributed throughout the three sub-genomes (A, B and D). The mutation frequency was determined to be approximately one per 20,000 bp. All the 70 selected salt-tolerant lines were tested for root growth in the laboratory, and under saline field conditions in Bangladesh. The results showed that all the lines selected for tolerance showed a better salt tolerance phenotype than both BARI Gom-25 and other local wheat varieties tested.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The mutant wheat population developed here will be a valuable resource in the development of novel salt-tolerant varieties for the benefit of saline farming.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31931695
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2137-8
pii: 10.1186/s12870-019-2137-8
pmc: PMC6958588
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mutagens
0
Ethyl Methanesulfonate
9H154DI0UP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18Subventions
Organisme : Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning
ID : CTS 17:32
Organisme : VR/SIDA
ID : 2013-06673
Références
Biotechniques. 2016 Oct 1;61(4):203-205
pubmed: 27712583
Mol Plant. 2016 Jul 6;9(7):1078-81
pubmed: 27018389
BMC Genomics. 2015 Nov 17;16:962
pubmed: 26578187
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163272
pubmed: 27684555
Plant Cell. 2002;14 Suppl:S15-45
pubmed: 12045268
Mutat Res. 1980 Jan;75(1):63-129
pubmed: 6767183
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011 Dec;325(2):162-9
pubmed: 22029887
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 May 12;10:86
pubmed: 20459868
J Exp Bot. 2004 Feb;55(396):307-19
pubmed: 14718494
Gigascience. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):1-7
pubmed: 29069494
BMC Plant Biol. 2004 Jul 28;4:12
pubmed: 15282033
J Exp Bot. 2005 Sep;56(419):2365-78
pubmed: 16014366
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Feb 9;7(2):413-425
pubmed: 28040779
AoB Plants. 2013;5:pls042
pubmed: 23304431
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jan;23(1):75-81
pubmed: 15580263
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;14(2):194-9
pubmed: 12732320
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(10):2817-25
pubmed: 19516074
Planta. 2003 Nov;218(1):1-14
pubmed: 14513379
Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Feb;6(2):66-71
pubmed: 11173290
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4
pubmed: 22106295
Geochem Trans. 2016 Jul 11;17:4
pubmed: 27403083
J Exp Bot. 2016 Jun;67(12):3719-29
pubmed: 26951370
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 2;7(1):2731
pubmed: 28578401
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Aug 08;7:1193
pubmed: 27551288
BMC Plant Biol. 2007 Apr 11;7:19
pubmed: 17428339
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 1;27(15):2156-8
pubmed: 21653522
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247-73
pubmed: 12221975
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Jan;14(1):51-60
pubmed: 25689669
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 12;363(1491):557-72
pubmed: 17715053
Science. 2018 Aug 17;361(6403):
pubmed: 30115783
Cell. 1984 May;37(1):67-75
pubmed: 6373014
Int J Plant Genomics. 2011;2011:314829
pubmed: 22315587
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005 Dec 15;444(2):139-58
pubmed: 16309626
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 03;9:1049
pubmed: 30123227
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Plant J. 2004 Oct;40(1):143-50
pubmed: 15361148