Enteric infection induces Lark-mediated intron retention at the 5' end of Drosophila genes.
DGRP
Drosophila melanogaster
Gut
Infection
Intron retention
LARK
RBM4
Small exon
Splicing
Systems genetics
sQTL
Journal
Genome biology
ISSN: 1474-760X
Titre abrégé: Genome Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100960660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 01 2020
17 01 2020
Historique:
received:
15
04
2019
accepted:
09
12
2019
entrez:
18
1
2020
pubmed:
18
1
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
RNA splicing is a key post-transcriptional mechanism that generates protein diversity and contributes to the fine-tuning of gene expression, which may facilitate adaptation to environmental challenges. Here, we employ a systems approach to study alternative splicing changes upon enteric infection in females from classical Drosophila melanogaster strains as well as 38 inbred lines. We find that infection leads to extensive differences in isoform ratios, which results in a more diverse transcriptome with longer 5' untranslated regions (5'UTRs). We establish a role for genetic variation in mediating inter-individual splicing differences, with local splicing quantitative trait loci (local-sQTLs) being preferentially located at the 5' end of transcripts and directly upstream of splice donor sites. Moreover, local-sQTLs are more numerous in the infected state, indicating that acute stress unmasks a substantial number of silent genetic variants. We observe a general increase in intron retention concentrated at the 5' end of transcripts across multiple strains, whose prevalence scales with the degree of pathogen virulence. The length, GC content, and RNA polymerase II occupancy of these introns with increased retention suggest that they have exon-like characteristics. We further uncover that retained intron sequences are enriched for the Lark/RBM4 RNA binding motif. Interestingly, we find that lark is induced by infection in wild-type flies, its overexpression and knockdown alter survival, and tissue-specific overexpression mimics infection-induced intron retention. Our collective findings point to pervasive and consistent RNA splicing changes, partly mediated by Lark/RBM4, as being an important aspect of the gut response to infection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
RNA splicing is a key post-transcriptional mechanism that generates protein diversity and contributes to the fine-tuning of gene expression, which may facilitate adaptation to environmental challenges. Here, we employ a systems approach to study alternative splicing changes upon enteric infection in females from classical Drosophila melanogaster strains as well as 38 inbred lines.
RESULTS
We find that infection leads to extensive differences in isoform ratios, which results in a more diverse transcriptome with longer 5' untranslated regions (5'UTRs). We establish a role for genetic variation in mediating inter-individual splicing differences, with local splicing quantitative trait loci (local-sQTLs) being preferentially located at the 5' end of transcripts and directly upstream of splice donor sites. Moreover, local-sQTLs are more numerous in the infected state, indicating that acute stress unmasks a substantial number of silent genetic variants. We observe a general increase in intron retention concentrated at the 5' end of transcripts across multiple strains, whose prevalence scales with the degree of pathogen virulence. The length, GC content, and RNA polymerase II occupancy of these introns with increased retention suggest that they have exon-like characteristics. We further uncover that retained intron sequences are enriched for the Lark/RBM4 RNA binding motif. Interestingly, we find that lark is induced by infection in wild-type flies, its overexpression and knockdown alter survival, and tissue-specific overexpression mimics infection-induced intron retention.
CONCLUSION
Our collective findings point to pervasive and consistent RNA splicing changes, partly mediated by Lark/RBM4, as being an important aspect of the gut response to infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31948480
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1918-6
pii: 10.1186/s13059-019-1918-6
pmc: PMC6966827
doi:
Substances chimiques
5' Untranslated Regions
0
Drosophila Proteins
0
Lark protein, Drosophila
0
RNA-Binding Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4Références
RNA. 2011 Oct;17(10):1884-94
pubmed: 21865603
Cell. 1986 Apr 25;45(2):185-93
pubmed: 2421918
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 15;23(2):257-8
pubmed: 17098774
Cell Host Microbe. 2009 Feb 19;5(2):200-11
pubmed: 19218090
Cell Rep. 2013 May 30;3(5):1725-38
pubmed: 23643535
Cancer Cell. 2014 Sep 8;26(3):374-389
pubmed: 25203323
Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):390-401
pubmed: 21163941
Annu Rev Genet. 2013;47:377-404
pubmed: 24016187
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2017 Apr;43:46-52
pubmed: 28011293
Cell Host Microbe. 2012 Jul 19;12(1):60-70
pubmed: 22817988
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Sep;11(9):615-26
pubmed: 23893105
Trends Biochem Sci. 2009 Mar;34(3):146-53
pubmed: 19208481
PLoS Biol. 2018 Jul 20;16(7):e2003903
pubmed: 30028832
FEBS J. 2013 Sep;280(18):4693-707
pubmed: 23876217
J Biol Chem. 2008 Feb 1;283(5):2543-53
pubmed: 18055463
Genome Res. 2012 Mar;22(3):528-38
pubmed: 22113879
Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:697-743
pubmed: 17201680
Syst Synth Biol. 2010 Jun;4(2):105-16
pubmed: 20805931
Front Physiol. 2013 Dec 17;4:375
pubmed: 24381562
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 25;5:16923
pubmed: 26603754
Nat Commun. 2014 Aug 20;5:4698
pubmed: 25140736
Genome Biol. 2011;12(2):R13
pubmed: 21310039
Genome Biol. 2011;12(1):R9
pubmed: 21251333
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 01;11:165
pubmed: 20356413
Hum Genet. 2017 Sep;136(9):1043-1057
pubmed: 28391524
Genome Res. 2014 Nov;24(11):1774-86
pubmed: 25258385
J Neurobiol. 1996 Sep;31(1):117-28
pubmed: 9120432
Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2013 Jan-Feb;4(1):49-60
pubmed: 23044818
PLoS Genet. 2010 Dec 09;6(12):e1001236
pubmed: 21151575
Genes Dev. 2011 Dec 1;25(23):2502-12
pubmed: 22156210
Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Jun;14(6):361-76
pubmed: 24854588
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jul 1;43(W1):W39-49
pubmed: 25953851
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Mar 18;44(5):e45
pubmed: 26578583
Nat Methods. 2010 Dec;7(12):1009-15
pubmed: 21057496
Cell. 2009 Jun 26;137(7):1343-55
pubmed: 19563763
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 3;101(31):11269-74
pubmed: 15277680
Nature. 2013 Jul 11;499(7457):172-7
pubmed: 23846655
Cell Rep. 2014 Jun 12;7(5):1362-1370
pubmed: 24857664
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800
pubmed: 21789182
Genome Res. 2014 Jul;24(7):1193-208
pubmed: 24714809
Cell Rep. 2012 May 31;1(5):543-56
pubmed: 22832277
Genome Res. 2014 May;24(5):786-96
pubmed: 24515119
Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Oct;15(10):689-701
pubmed: 25112293
Genome Biol. 2014 Feb 03;15(2):R29
pubmed: 24485249
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13;104(7):2235-40
pubmed: 17284590
Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 Nov;8(11):889-95
pubmed: 18927577
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 27;6:7829
pubmed: 26213329
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 9;102(32):11414-9
pubmed: 16061818
RNA Biol. 2011 Sep-Oct;8(5):740-7
pubmed: 21712650
FEBS Lett. 2008 Jun 18;582(14):1977-86
pubmed: 18342629
PLoS Genet. 2014 Sep 25;10(9):e1004659
pubmed: 25254641
PLoS Genet. 2014 Sep 11;10(9):e1004536
pubmed: 25211129
Trends Genet. 2006 Mar;22(3):119-22
pubmed: 16430990