Comparison of the effectiveness of a tailored cognitive behavioural therapy with a supportive listening intervention for depression in those newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (the ACTION-MS trial): protocol of an assessor-blinded, active comparator, randomised controlled trial.
Adaptation, Psychological
Anxiety
/ psychology
Australia
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
/ methods
Depressive Disorder
/ psychology
Fatigue
Humans
Multiple Sclerosis
/ diagnosis
Psychotherapy
/ methods
Quality of Life
Resilience, Psychological
Single-Blind Method
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Social Support
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Anxiety
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)
Depression
Multiple sclerosis
Newly diagnosed
Randomised controlled trial
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 01 2020
20 01 2020
Historique:
received:
20
10
2019
accepted:
19
12
2019
entrez:
22
1
2020
pubmed:
22
1
2020
medline:
18
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an unpredictable, chronic neurological disease accompanied with high rates of depression and anxiety, particularly in the early stages of diagnosis. There is evidence to suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is effective for the treatment of depression amongst individuals with MS; however, there is a paucity of tailored CBT interventions designed to be offered in the newly diagnosed period. This trial is the first to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a tailored CBT intervention compared to a supportive listening (SL) intervention amongst individuals with MS who are depressed. ACTION-MS is a two-arm parallel group, assessor-blinded, active comparator, randomised controlled trial which will test whether a tailored CBT-based intervention compared to an SL intervention can reduce depression and related factors such as anxiety, fatigue, pain and sleep problems in those newly diagnosed with MS. Sixty participants who are within 5 years of having received a diagnosis of MS and scored within the mild to moderate range of depression on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) will be recruited from MS clinics located across three hospital sites in Melbourne, Australia. The primary outcome is depression severity using the BDI-II at post-assessment. Intervention satisfaction and acceptability will be assessed. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be conducted. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. There is a scarcity of psychological interventions for depression targeting the newly diagnosed period. However, interventions during this time point have the potential to have a major impact on the mental and physical wellbeing of those newly diagnosed with MS. The current trial will provide data on the effectiveness of a tailored CBT intervention for the treatment of depression in those newly diagnosed with MS. Findings will also provide effect size estimates that can be used to power a later-stage multi-centre trial of treatment efficacy, and will provide information on the mechanisms underlying any treatment effects and cost-effectiveness data for delivering this intervention in outpatient MS clinics. ISRCTN trials registry, ISRCTN63987586. Current controlled trials. Retrospectively registered on 20 October 2017.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an unpredictable, chronic neurological disease accompanied with high rates of depression and anxiety, particularly in the early stages of diagnosis. There is evidence to suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is effective for the treatment of depression amongst individuals with MS; however, there is a paucity of tailored CBT interventions designed to be offered in the newly diagnosed period. This trial is the first to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a tailored CBT intervention compared to a supportive listening (SL) intervention amongst individuals with MS who are depressed.
METHODS
ACTION-MS is a two-arm parallel group, assessor-blinded, active comparator, randomised controlled trial which will test whether a tailored CBT-based intervention compared to an SL intervention can reduce depression and related factors such as anxiety, fatigue, pain and sleep problems in those newly diagnosed with MS. Sixty participants who are within 5 years of having received a diagnosis of MS and scored within the mild to moderate range of depression on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) will be recruited from MS clinics located across three hospital sites in Melbourne, Australia. The primary outcome is depression severity using the BDI-II at post-assessment. Intervention satisfaction and acceptability will be assessed. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be conducted. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.
DISCUSSION
There is a scarcity of psychological interventions for depression targeting the newly diagnosed period. However, interventions during this time point have the potential to have a major impact on the mental and physical wellbeing of those newly diagnosed with MS. The current trial will provide data on the effectiveness of a tailored CBT intervention for the treatment of depression in those newly diagnosed with MS. Findings will also provide effect size estimates that can be used to power a later-stage multi-centre trial of treatment efficacy, and will provide information on the mechanisms underlying any treatment effects and cost-effectiveness data for delivering this intervention in outpatient MS clinics.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN trials registry, ISRCTN63987586. Current controlled trials. Retrospectively registered on 20 October 2017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31959224
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4018-8
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-4018-8
pmc: PMC6971867
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100Subventions
Organisme : Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia
ID : Project Grant 15-013
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Neurol Sci. 2011 Aug 15;307(1-2):86-91
pubmed: 21621796
Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213
pubmed: 2748771
J Neurol Sci. 2011 Aug 15;307(1-2):120-6
pubmed: 21636099
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Jul;40(4):1028-33
pubmed: 6480837
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2000;30(4):309-17
pubmed: 11308035
Lancet Neurol. 2005 Sep;4(9):556-66
pubmed: 16109362
Acta Neurol Scand. 2003 Dec;108(6):389-95
pubmed: 14616290
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;159(11):1862-8
pubmed: 12411220
Neurology. 1991 Aug;41(8):1193-6
pubmed: 1866003
Qual Life Res. 1995 Jun;4(3):187-206
pubmed: 7613530
J Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;57(4):479-99
pubmed: 11255203
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 09;14:5
pubmed: 24406031
J Neuroimmunol. 1993 Jul;46(1-2):123-8
pubmed: 7689582
Chronic Illn. 2008 Sep;4(3):160-72
pubmed: 18796505
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 7;16(1):435
pubmed: 27927175
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 Sep;14(5):691-724
pubmed: 18764967
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008;29(2):101-14
pubmed: 18293219
BMC Neurol. 2012 Jul 16;12:55
pubmed: 22799620
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;76(4):469-75
pubmed: 15774430
J Psychother Pract Res. 1996 Summer;5(3):260-71
pubmed: 22700294
Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(6):635-45
pubmed: 25588098
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Mar 15;28(5):307-14
pubmed: 16492625
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Jan;5:12-26
pubmed: 26856938
Mult Scler. 1996 Dec;2(5):222-6
pubmed: 9050360
Disabil Health J. 2010 Apr;3(2):93-8
pubmed: 21122774
Acta Neurol Scand. 2010 Mar;121(3):161-70
pubmed: 20070277