Prediction of Pulmonary to Systemic Flow Ratio in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Using Deep Learning-Based Analysis of Chest Radiographs.
Journal
JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2020
01 04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
23
1
2020
medline:
15
1
2021
entrez:
23
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chest radiography is a useful noninvasive modality to evaluate pulmonary blood flow status in patients with congenital heart disease. However, the predictive value of chest radiography is limited by the subjective and qualitive nature of the interpretation. Recently, deep learning has been used to analyze various images, but it has not been applied to analyzing chest radiographs in such patients. To develop and validate a quantitative method to predict the pulmonary to systemic flow ratio from chest radiographs using deep learning. This retrospective observational study included 1031 cardiac catheterizations performed for 657 patients from January 1, 2005, to April 30, 2019, at a tertiary center. Catheterizations without the Fick-derived pulmonary to systemic flow ratio or chest radiography performed within 1 month before catheterization were excluded. Seventy-eight patients (100 catheterizations) were randomly assigned for evaluation. A deep learning model that predicts the pulmonary to systemic flow ratio from chest radiographs was developed using the method of transfer learning. Whether the model can predict the pulmonary to systemic flow ratio from chest radiographs was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. The diagnostic concordance rate was compared with 3 certified pediatric cardiologists. The diagnostic performance for a high pulmonary to systemic flow ratio of 2.0 or more was evaluated using cross tabulation and a receiver operating characteristic curve. The study included 1031 catheterizations in 657 patients (522 males [51%]; median age, 3.4 years [interquartile range, 1.2-8.6 years]), in whom the mean (SD) Fick-derived pulmonary to systemic flow ratio was 1.43 (0.95). Diagnosis included congenital heart disease in 1008 catheterizations (98%). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Fick-derived and deep learning-derived pulmonary to systemic flow ratio was 0.68, the log-transformed bias was 0.02, and the log-transformed precision was 0.12. The diagnostic concordance rate of the deep learning model was significantly higher than that of the experts (correctly classified 64 of 100 vs 49 of 100 chest radiographs; P = .02 [McNemar test]). For detecting a high pulmonary to systemic flow ratio, the sensitivity of the deep learning model was 0.47, the specificity was 0.95, and the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.88. The present investigation demonstrated that deep learning-based analysis of chest radiographs predicted the pulmonary to systemic flow ratio in patients with congenital heart disease. These findings suggest that the deep learning-based approach may confer an objective and quantitative evaluation of chest radiographs in the congenital heart disease clinic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31968049
pii: 2759255
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5620
pmc: PMC6990846
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
449-457Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2402-2410
pubmed: 27898976
Circulation. 1984 Jan;69(1):73-9
pubmed: 6689649
Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):574-582
pubmed: 28436741
Circulation. 2001 May 22;103(20):2476-82
pubmed: 11369688
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
Comput Biol Med. 1989;19(1):61-70
pubmed: 2917462
PeerJ. 2014 Jun 19;2:e453
pubmed: 25024921
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):741-748
pubmed: 31015647
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Aug 04;8:2015-22
pubmed: 26346558
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Am J Cardiol. 1983 Mar 15;51(6):952-6
pubmed: 6829471
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):460-468
pubmed: 28600640