Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
Aged
Artifacts
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Deep Learning
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Registries
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
ASiR-V
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-veo
Coronary CT angiography
DLIR
Deep-learning image reconstruction
Diagnostic accuracy
Image quality
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
ISSN: 1876-861X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101308347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
23
08
2019
revised:
29
10
2019
accepted:
08
01
2020
pubmed:
25
1
2020
medline:
7
10
2020
entrez:
25
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Advances in image reconstruction are necessary to decrease radiation exposure from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) further, but iterative reconstruction has been shown to degrade image quality at high levels. Deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) offers unique opportunities to overcome these limitations. The present study compared the impact of DLIR and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) on quantitative and qualitative image parameters and the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the standard of reference. This retrospective study includes 43 patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and ICA. Datasets were reconstructed with ASiR-V 70% (using standard [SD] and high-definition [HD] kernels) and with DLIR at different levels (i.e., medium [M] and high [H]). Image noise, image quality, and coronary luminal narrowing were evaluated by three blinded readers. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against ICA. Noise did not significantly differ between ASiR-V SD and DLIR-M (37 vs. 37 HU, p = 1.000), but was significantly lower in DLIR-H (30 HU, p < 0.001) and higher in ASiR-V HD (53 HU, p < 0.001). Image quality was higher for DLIR-M and DLIR-H (3.4-3.8 and 4.2-4.6) compared to ASiR-V SD and HD (2.1-2.7 and 1.8-2.2; p < 0.001), with DLIR-H yielding the highest image quality. Consistently across readers, no significant differences in sensitivity (88% vs. 92%; p = 0.453), specificity (73% vs. 73%; p = 0.583) and diagnostic accuracy (80% vs. 82%; p = 0.366) were found between ASiR-V HD and DLIR-H. DLIR significantly reduces noise in CCTA compared to ASiR-V, while yielding superior image quality at equal diagnostic accuracy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Advances in image reconstruction are necessary to decrease radiation exposure from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) further, but iterative reconstruction has been shown to degrade image quality at high levels. Deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) offers unique opportunities to overcome these limitations. The present study compared the impact of DLIR and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) on quantitative and qualitative image parameters and the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the standard of reference.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective study includes 43 patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and ICA. Datasets were reconstructed with ASiR-V 70% (using standard [SD] and high-definition [HD] kernels) and with DLIR at different levels (i.e., medium [M] and high [H]). Image noise, image quality, and coronary luminal narrowing were evaluated by three blinded readers. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against ICA.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Noise did not significantly differ between ASiR-V SD and DLIR-M (37 vs. 37 HU, p = 1.000), but was significantly lower in DLIR-H (30 HU, p < 0.001) and higher in ASiR-V HD (53 HU, p < 0.001). Image quality was higher for DLIR-M and DLIR-H (3.4-3.8 and 4.2-4.6) compared to ASiR-V SD and HD (2.1-2.7 and 1.8-2.2; p < 0.001), with DLIR-H yielding the highest image quality. Consistently across readers, no significant differences in sensitivity (88% vs. 92%; p = 0.453), specificity (73% vs. 73%; p = 0.583) and diagnostic accuracy (80% vs. 82%; p = 0.366) were found between ASiR-V HD and DLIR-H.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
DLIR significantly reduces noise in CCTA compared to ASiR-V, while yielding superior image quality at equal diagnostic accuracy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31974008
pii: S1934-5925(19)30464-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.002
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
444-451Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The University Hospital Zurich holds a research agreement with GE Healthcare.