Measuring response inhibition with a continuous inhibitory-control task.
Inhibition
Inhibitory control
Pigeon
Response inhibition
Journal
Learning & behavior
ISSN: 1543-4508
Titre abrégé: Learn Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101155056
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
14
8
2020
entrez:
31
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Inhibitory control enables subjects to quickly react to unexpected changes in external demands. In humans, this kind of behavioral flexibility is often used as an indicator of an individual's executive functions, and more and more research has emerged to investigate this link in nonhuman animals as well. Here we explored the value of a recently developed continuous inhibitory-control task in assessing inhibitory-control capacities in animals. Pigeons completed a response-inhibition task that required them to adjust their movement in space in pursuit of a reward across changing target locations. Inhibition was measured in terms of movement trajectory (path taken toward the correct location for trials in which the target location did and did not change) and velocity (both before and after correcting the trajectory toward the changed location). Although the observed velocities did not follow any of our predictions in a clear way, the pigeons' movement trajectories did prove to be a good indicator of inhibitory control, showing that pigeons, though limited in their capacities relative to the sophisticated control strategies expressed by humans, are capable of exerting some forms of inhibitory control. These results strengthen the role of this paradigm as a valuable tool for evaluating inhibitory-control abilities across the animal kingdom.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31997253
doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00403-7
pii: 10.3758/s13420-019-00403-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
149-164Références
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Jun;11(3):419-27
pubmed: 15376789
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Apr;37(2):106-16
pubmed: 19455377
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 13;7(1):13144
pubmed: 29030593
Anim Cogn. 2017 Nov;20(6):1035-1047
pubmed: 28795236
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):301-10
pubmed: 16811795
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;23(2):201-16
pubmed: 18096360
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;4(2):162-76
pubmed: 26158943
Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;106(1):3-19
pubmed: 10197361
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1212-28
pubmed: 18823206
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):82-94
pubmed: 29323519
Brain Res. 2012 Jan 5;1428:3-12
pubmed: 21676379
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Oct;45(4):464-473
pubmed: 31368768
Cogn Psychol. 2016 May;86:27-61
pubmed: 26859519
Neuropsychol Rev. 2007 Sep;17(3):213-33
pubmed: 17786559
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0118469
pubmed: 25714840
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):497-524
pubmed: 25419227
Anim Cogn. 2017 Jul;20(4):615-626
pubmed: 28389761
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):392-404
pubmed: 21171806
Anim Cogn. 2016 Nov;19(6):1165-1172
pubmed: 27541147
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):955-66
pubmed: 22268912
Behav Brain Res. 2003 Nov 30;146(1-2):131-44
pubmed: 14643466
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):522-536
pubmed: 30251102
Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:81-95
pubmed: 26036922
Brain Cogn. 2008 Oct;68(1):92-9
pubmed: 18397818
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 May;33(5):647-61
pubmed: 18822313
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:39-57
pubmed: 28578245
Neuroscience. 2014 Mar 28;263:96-110
pubmed: 24440749
Anim Cogn. 2018 Jan;21(1):21-35
pubmed: 29234898
Psychol Bull. 1979 May;86(3):446-61
pubmed: 451109