The effects of common structural variants on 3D chromatin structure.
Chromatin
Deletion
Hi-C
Inversion
Structural variation
TAD
TAD fusion
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jan 2020
30 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
13
09
2019
accepted:
20
01
2020
entrez:
1
2
2020
pubmed:
1
2
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Three-dimensional spatial organization of chromosomes is defined by highly self-interacting regions 0.1-1 Mb in size termed Topological Associating Domains (TADs). Genetic factors that explain dynamic variation in TAD structure are not understood. We hypothesize that common structural variation (SV) in the human population can disrupt regulatory sequences and thereby influence TAD formation. To determine the effects of SVs on 3D chromatin organization, we performed chromosome conformation capture sequencing (Hi-C) of lymphoblastoid cell lines from 19 subjects for which SVs had been previously characterized in the 1000 genomes project. We tested the effects of common deletion polymorphisms on TAD structure by linear regression analysis of nearby quantitative chromatin interactions (contacts) within 240 kb of the deletion, and we specifically tested the hypothesis that deletions at TAD boundaries (TBs) could result in large-scale alterations in chromatin conformation. Large (> 10 kb) deletions had significant effects on long-range chromatin interactions. Deletions were associated with increased contacts that span the deleted region and this effect was driven by large deletions that were not located within a TAD boundary (nonTB). Some deletions at TBs, including a 80 kb deletion of the genes CFHR1 and CFHR3, had detectable effects on chromatin contacts. However for TB deletions overall, we did not detect a pattern of effects that was consistent in magnitude or direction. Large inversions in the population had a distinguishable signature characterized by a rearrangement of contacts that span its breakpoints. Our study demonstrates that common SVs in the population impact long-range chromatin structure, and deletions and inversions have distinct signatures. However, the effects that we observe are subtle and variable between loci. Genome-wide analysis of chromatin conformation in large cohorts will be needed to quantify the influence of common SVs on chromatin structure.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Three-dimensional spatial organization of chromosomes is defined by highly self-interacting regions 0.1-1 Mb in size termed Topological Associating Domains (TADs). Genetic factors that explain dynamic variation in TAD structure are not understood. We hypothesize that common structural variation (SV) in the human population can disrupt regulatory sequences and thereby influence TAD formation. To determine the effects of SVs on 3D chromatin organization, we performed chromosome conformation capture sequencing (Hi-C) of lymphoblastoid cell lines from 19 subjects for which SVs had been previously characterized in the 1000 genomes project. We tested the effects of common deletion polymorphisms on TAD structure by linear regression analysis of nearby quantitative chromatin interactions (contacts) within 240 kb of the deletion, and we specifically tested the hypothesis that deletions at TAD boundaries (TBs) could result in large-scale alterations in chromatin conformation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Large (> 10 kb) deletions had significant effects on long-range chromatin interactions. Deletions were associated with increased contacts that span the deleted region and this effect was driven by large deletions that were not located within a TAD boundary (nonTB). Some deletions at TBs, including a 80 kb deletion of the genes CFHR1 and CFHR3, had detectable effects on chromatin contacts. However for TB deletions overall, we did not detect a pattern of effects that was consistent in magnitude or direction. Large inversions in the population had a distinguishable signature characterized by a rearrangement of contacts that span its breakpoints.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates that common SVs in the population impact long-range chromatin structure, and deletions and inversions have distinct signatures. However, the effects that we observe are subtle and variable between loci. Genome-wide analysis of chromatin conformation in large cohorts will be needed to quantify the influence of common SVs on chromatin structure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32000688
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6516-1
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-6516-1
pmc: PMC6990566
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chromatin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
95Subventions
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG002898
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA095616
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R43 CA094566
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : HG007497
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HG007497
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : T32 DK067872
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA094025
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA094143
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R44 CA094566
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Mark J P Chaisson
(MJP)
Ashley D Sanders
(AD)
Xuefang Zhao
(X)
Ankit Malhotra
(A)
David Porubsky
(D)
Tobias Rausch
(T)
Eugene J Gardner
(EJ)
Oscar L Rodriguez
(OL)
Li Guo
(L)
Ryan L Collins
(RL)
Xian Fan
(X)
Jia Wen
(J)
Robert E Handsaker
(RE)
Susan Fairley
(S)
Zev N Kronenberg
(ZN)
Xiangmeng Kong
(X)
Fereydoun Hormozdiari
(F)
Dillon Lee
(D)
Aaron M Wenger
(AM)
Alex R Hastie
(AR)
Danny Antaki
(D)
Thomas Anantharaman
(T)
Peter A Audano
(PA)
Harrison Brand
(H)
Stuart Cantsilieris
(S)
Han Cao
(H)
Eliza Cerveira
(E)
Chong Chen
(C)
Xintong Chen
(X)
Chen-Shan Chin
(CS)
Zechen Chong
(Z)
Nelson T Chuang
(NT)
Christine C Lambert
(CC)
Deanna M Church
(DM)
Laura Clarke
(L)
Andrew Farrell
(A)
Joey Flores
(J)
Timur Galeey
(T)
Madhusudan Gujral
(M)
Victor Guryev
(V)
William Haynes Heaton
(WH)
Jonas Korlach
(J)
Sushant Kumar
(S)
Jee Young Kwon
(JY)
Ernest T Lam
(ET)
Jong Eun Lee
(JE)
Joyce Lee
(J)
Wan-Ping Lee
(WP)
Sau Peng Lee
(SP)
Shantao Li
(S)
Patrick Marks
(P)
Karine Viaud-Martinez
(K)
Sascha Meiers
(S)
Katherine M Munson
(KM)
Fabio C P Navarro
(FCP)
Bradley J Nelson
(BJ)
Conor Nodzak
(C)
Amina Noor
(A)
Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou
(S)
Andy W C Pang
(AWC)
Gabriel Rosanio
(G)
Mallory Ryan
(M)
Adrian Stütz
(A)
Diana C J Spierings
(DCJ)
Alistair Ward
(A)
Anne Marie E Welch
(AME)
Ming Xiao
(M)
Wei Xu
(W)
Chengsheng Zhang
(C)
Qihui Zhu
(Q)
Xiangqun Zheng-Bradley
(X)
Ernesto Lowy
(E)
Sergei Yakneen
(S)
Steven McCarroll
(S)
Goo Jun
(G)
Li Ding
(L)
Chong Lek Koh
(CL)
Paul Flicek
(P)
Ken Chen
(K)
Mark B Gerstein
(MB)
Pui-Yan Kwok
(PY)
Peter M Lansdorp
(PM)
Gabor T Marth
(GT)
Jonathan Sebat
(J)
Xinghua Shi
(X)
Ali Bashir
(A)
Kai Ye
(K)
Scott E Devine
(SE)
Michael E Talkowski
(ME)
Ryan E Mills
(RE)
Tobias Marschall
(T)
Jan O Korbel
(JO)
Evan E Eichler
(EE)
Charles Lee
(C)
Références
Science. 2009 Oct 9;326(5950):289-93
pubmed: 19815776
Genome Res. 2016 Nov;26(11):1453-1467
pubmed: 27803192
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):265-269
pubmed: 27706140
Cell. 2015 May 21;161(5):1012-1025
pubmed: 25959774
Nature. 2017 Nov 2;551(7678):38-40
pubmed: 28976964
Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 28;20(1):255
pubmed: 31779666
Trends Genet. 2016 Apr;32(4):225-237
pubmed: 26862051
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jul;19(7):453-467
pubmed: 29692413
PLoS Genet. 2011 May;7(5):e1002079
pubmed: 21637784
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):E4433-E4442
pubmed: 29686068
Genome Biol. 2019 Mar 21;20(1):60
pubmed: 30898144
Nature. 2015 Feb 19;518(7539):331-6
pubmed: 25693564
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
pubmed: 8970487
Nat Genet. 2006 Oct;38(10):1173-7
pubmed: 16998489
Nat Methods. 2015 Nov;12(11):1061-3
pubmed: 26366987
Genome Biol. 2019 Jul 30;20(1):148
pubmed: 31362752
Science. 2013 Nov 8;342(6159):747-9
pubmed: 24136359
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2016 Aug 31;17:17-43
pubmed: 27089971
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):75-81
pubmed: 26432246
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
PLoS Genet. 2007 Mar 16;3(3):e41
pubmed: 17367211
Science. 2007 Oct 19;318(5849):420-6
pubmed: 17901297
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 16;10(1):1784
pubmed: 30992455
Nature. 2012 Apr 11;485(7398):376-80
pubmed: 22495300
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 1;28(23):3131-3
pubmed: 23023982
Nat Genet. 2017 May;49(5):692-699
pubmed: 28369037
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D1001-6
pubmed: 24316577
Am J Med Genet. 2002 Oct 15;112(3):256-65
pubmed: 12357469