Concordance of various chromosomal errors among different parts of the embryo and the value of re-biopsy in embryos with segmental aneuploidies.
ART
concordance of chromosomal errors
embryo re-biopsy
infertility
massive parallel sequencing
mosaicism
preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy
segmental aneuploidy
Journal
Molecular human reproduction
ISSN: 1460-2407
Titre abrégé: Mol Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9513710
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 04 2020
24 04 2020
Historique:
received:
29
10
2019
revised:
20
01
2020
accepted:
31
01
2020
pubmed:
6
2
2020
medline:
27
5
2021
entrez:
4
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chromosomal mosaicism detected during preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and its impact on embryo implantation have been widely discussed, and healthy live births from mosaic embryos were reported by many groups. On the other hand, only very few studies have focused on segmental chromosome aneuploidies and their clinical impact. Eighty-nine embryos with various PGT-A results (trophectoderm 1: TE1) were re-analysed using a second trophectoderm biopsy (TE2) and the rest of the embryo (RE) for testing. Of 19 euploid TE1 biopsies, 18 were concordant across TE2 and RE. Similarly, whole chromosomal aneuploidies were concordant in 59 of 62 TE1-TE2 and 58 TE1-RE. In contrast, from 31 segmental aneuploidies detected in TE1, only 15 were observed again in TE2 and 14 in RE. If a TE1 segmental abnormality appeared again in TE2, it was almost always present in RE (17/18) as well. Moreover, when a TE1 segmental abnormality was not detected in TE2, in 12 out of 13 cases RE was also unaffected. Similarly, only 1 of 26 TE1 whole chromosome mosaics were repeated in TE2 and 7 in RE. Our study confirms that euploid and whole chromosomal aneuploidy results are highly predictive of the embryo. In contrast, mosaicism has a very low concordance rate. Most importantly, re-biopsy of embryos with segmental aneuploidies demonstrated that they are mostly not uniform across the embryo. Finally, in the case of segmental aneuploidy, the second biopsy enables an accurate prediction of the real status of the embryo and could be offered to patients undergoing PGT-A.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32011698
pii: 5721558
doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaaa012
pmc: PMC7187872
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
269-276Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Références
Fertil Steril. 2019 Feb;111(2):280-293
pubmed: 30691630
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jan 01;34(1):181-192
pubmed: 30418565
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):656-663.e1
pubmed: 24355045
Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 May;14(5):628-34
pubmed: 17509208
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Jun 18;13(7):493-504
pubmed: 22705668
PLoS Genet. 2015 Oct 22;11(10):e1005601
pubmed: 26491874
Hum Genet. 2017 Jul;136(7):805-819
pubmed: 28393271
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):743-749
pubmed: 28333245
Nature. 1988 Mar 31;332(6163):459-61
pubmed: 3352746
Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):999-1006
pubmed: 29100625
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):27-31
pubmed: 27816233
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jan;49(1):30-9
pubmed: 21839454
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):280-91
pubmed: 11283700
Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 01;32(12):2549-2560
pubmed: 29126206
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Mar;30(3):281-9
pubmed: 25599824
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jul;108(1):62-71.e8
pubmed: 28579407
Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1375-82
pubmed: 24613537
Mol Hum Reprod. 1999 Nov;5(11):1089-94
pubmed: 10541573
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):760-9
pubmed: 26520420
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Apr;34(4):487-493
pubmed: 28188593
Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr;105(4):1047-1055.e2
pubmed: 26776911
J Ovarian Res. 2017 Mar 27;10(1):21
pubmed: 28347334
Int J Fertil Steril. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(3):346-53
pubmed: 26644858
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Apr 27;15(1):33
pubmed: 28449669
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Mar;38(3):330-339
pubmed: 30639160
Mol Cytogenet. 2017 Apr 26;10:14
pubmed: 28450889
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):624-30
pubmed: 23773313
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Apr 1;41(6):e66
pubmed: 23295674
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Jan;34(1):80-93
pubmed: 22260768
Mol Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;24(12):593-601
pubmed: 30371814
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016 Jun;32(6):506-8
pubmed: 26872945
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Nov;33(11):1439-1444
pubmed: 27577322