Effect of Vancomycin or Daptomycin With vs Without an Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam on Mortality, Bacteremia, Relapse, or Treatment Failure in Patients With MRSA Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Adult
Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ adverse effects
Bacteremia
/ drug therapy
Cefazolin
/ therapeutic use
Cloxacillin
/ therapeutic use
Daptomycin
/ therapeutic use
Drug Therapy, Combination
Endocarditis, Bacterial
/ drug therapy
Female
Floxacillin
/ therapeutic use
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Middle Aged
Staphylococcal Infections
/ drug therapy
Treatment Failure
Vancomycin
/ therapeutic use
beta-Lactams
/ adverse effects
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 02 2020
11 02 2020
Historique:
entrez:
12
2
2020
pubmed:
12
2
2020
medline:
5
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is associated with mortality of more than 20%. Combining standard therapy with a β-lactam antibiotic has been associated with reduced mortality, although adequately powered randomized clinical trials of this intervention have not been conducted. To determine whether combining an antistaphylococcal β-lactam with standard therapy is more effective than standard therapy alone in patients with MRSA bacteremia. Open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 27 hospital sites in 4 countries from August 2015 to July 2018 among 352 hospitalized adults with MRSA bacteremia. Follow-up was complete on October 23, 2018. Participants were randomized to standard therapy (intravenous vancomycin or daptomycin) plus an antistaphylococcal β-lactam (intravenous flucloxacillin, cloxacillin, or cefazolin) (n = 174) or standard therapy alone (n = 178). Total duration of therapy was determined by treating clinicians and the β-lactam was administered for 7 days. The primary end point was a 90-day composite of mortality, persistent bacteremia at day 5, microbiological relapse, and microbiological treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included mortality at days 14, 42, and 90; persistent bacteremia at days 2 and 5; acute kidney injury (AKI); microbiological relapse; microbiological treatment failure; and duration of intravenous antibiotics. The data and safety monitoring board recommended early termination of the study prior to enrollment of 440 patients because of safety. Among 352 patients randomized (mean age, 62.2 [SD, 17.7] years; 121 women [34.4%]), 345 (98%) completed the trial. The primary end point was met by 59 (35%) with combination therapy and 68 (39%) with standard therapy (absolute difference, -4.2%; 95% CI, -14.3% to 6.0%). Seven of 9 prespecified secondary end points showed no significant difference. For the combination therapy vs standard therapy groups, all-cause 90-day mortality occurred in 35 (21%) vs 28 (16%) (difference, 4.5%; 95% CI, -3.7% to 12.7%); persistent bacteremia at day 5 was observed in 19 of 166 (11%) vs 35 of 172 (20%) (difference, -8.9%; 95% CI, -16.6% to -1.2%); and, excluding patients receiving dialysis at baseline, AKI occurred in 34 of 145 (23%) vs 9 of 145 (6%) (difference, 17.2%; 95% CI, 9.3%-25.2%). Among patients with MRSA bacteremia, addition of an antistaphylococcal β-lactam to standard antibiotic therapy with vancomycin or daptomycin did not result in significant improvement in the primary composite end point of mortality, persistent bacteremia, relapse, or treatment failure. Early trial termination for safety concerns and the possibility that the study was underpowered to detect clinically important differences in favor of the intervention should be considered when interpreting the findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02365493.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32044943
pii: 2760737
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0103
pmc: PMC7042887
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
beta-Lactams
0
Floxacillin
43B2M34G2V
Vancomycin
6Q205EH1VU
Cefazolin
IHS69L0Y4T
Daptomycin
NWQ5N31VKK
Cloxacillin
O6X5QGC2VB
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02365493']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
527-537Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999 Jan;11(1):7-12
pubmed: 10075272
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 15;62(2):173-180
pubmed: 26349552
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Nov;37(11):1347-1356
pubmed: 28949410
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Oct;146(14):1785-1792
pubmed: 30019657
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R31
pubmed: 17331245
Ann Intern Med. 1982 Oct;97(4):496-503
pubmed: 6751182
Kidney Int. 2019 Jan;95(1):160-172
pubmed: 30473140
Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391(10121):668-678
pubmed: 29249276
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 15;68(5):865-872
pubmed: 30202941
JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8
pubmed: 11594901
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 1;52(3):e18-55
pubmed: 21208910
J Mol Med (Berl). 2014 Feb;92(2):139-49
pubmed: 24297496
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):12-20
pubmed: 29088001
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Mar 08;68(9):214-219
pubmed: 30845118
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jul;28(3):603-61
pubmed: 26016486
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5):
pubmed: 30858203
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):
pubmed: 29203493
Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2018;42:
pubmed: 30626304
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 12;:
pubmed: 31404468
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jul;25(7):818-827
pubmed: 30928559
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;36(1):3-16
pubmed: 25643267
Trials. 2016 Mar 31;17:170
pubmed: 27029920