A Simple and Rapid UPLC-UV Method for Detecting DPD Deficiency in Patients With Cancer.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
/ administration & dosage
Biomarkers
/ blood
Capecitabine
/ administration & dosage
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
/ methods
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency
/ blood
Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)
/ metabolism
Female
Fluorouracil
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
/ blood
Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
/ methods
Uracil
/ analogs & derivatives
Journal
Clinical and translational science
ISSN: 1752-8062
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474067
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
24
10
2019
accepted:
20
12
2019
pubmed:
15
2
2020
medline:
3
9
2021
entrez:
15
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Detecting patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is becoming a major concern in clinical oncology. Monitoring physiologic plasma uracil and/or plasma uracil-to-dihydrouracil metabolic ratio is a common surrogate frequently used to determine DPD phenotype without direct measurement of the enzymatic activity. With respect to the increasing number of patients rquiring analysis, it is critical to develop simple, rapid, and affordable methods suitable for routine screening. We have developed and validated a simple and robust ultraperformance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (UPLC-UV) method with shortened (i.e., 12 minutes) analytical run-times, compatible with the requirements of large-scale upfront screening. The method enables detection of uracil (U) over a range of 5-500 ng/ml (265 nm) and of dihydrouracil (UH2) over a range of 40-500 ng/ml (210 nm) in plasma with no chromatographic interference. When used as part of routine screening for DPD deficiency, this method was fully able to discriminate nondeficient patients (i.e., with U levels < 16 ng/ml) from deficient patients at risk of severe toxicity (i.e., U > 16 ng/ml). Results from 1 month of routine testing are presented and, although no complete deficits were detected, 10.7% of the screened patients presented DPD deficiency and would thus require s decresed dose. Overall, this new method, using a simple preanalytical solid-phase extraction procedure, and based on use of a standard UPLC apparatus, is both cost- and time-effective and can be easily implemented in any laboratory aiming to begin routine DPD testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32058656
doi: 10.1111/cts.12762
pmc: PMC7359930
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
0
Biomarkers
0
dihydrouracil
016FR52RU5
Uracil
56HH86ZVCT
Capecitabine
6804DJ8Z9U
Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)
EC 1.3.1.2
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
761-768Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
Ther Drug Monit. 2006 Oct;28(5):678-85
pubmed: 17038885
Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(14):2028-2034
pubmed: 28128059
Pharmacogenomics. 2015;16(11):1277-86
pubmed: 26265346
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Nov;50:23-34
pubmed: 27589829
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005 Sep 5;823(2):98-107
pubmed: 16027050
Clin Biochem. 2016 Nov;49(16-17):1221-1226
pubmed: 27399164
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2003 Jul 15;792(1):107-15
pubmed: 12829003
J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001 Oct 25;762(2):203-9
pubmed: 11678380
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;74(4):757-63
pubmed: 25102934
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;81(1):124-30
pubmed: 26392323
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;81(3):553-61
pubmed: 26551538
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 15;12(2):549-55
pubmed: 16428499
Pharmacogenomics J. 2016 Aug;16(4):320-5
pubmed: 26216193
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Oct;104(4):709-718
pubmed: 29327356
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Jul 15;126:75-82
pubmed: 27179185
J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1995 Oct 20;672(2):233-9
pubmed: 8581129
Ther Drug Monit. 2019 Jun;41(3):383-390
pubmed: 30807536
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2010 Oct;9(4):224-8
pubmed: 20920994
Pharmacogenomics J. 2013 Oct;13(5):389-95
pubmed: 23856855
PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0175998
pubmed: 28481884
Br J Cancer. 2017 May 23;116(11):1415-1424
pubmed: 28427087
Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Mar;2(3):507-10
pubmed: 9816197
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002 Mar 25;769(1):169-76
pubmed: 11936689
J Sep Sci. 2017 Oct;40(19):3763-3770
pubmed: 28726286
Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Aug;31(4):482-8
pubmed: 19571774
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2006 Nov;6(4):288-96
pubmed: 17241513
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;84(12):2761-2769
pubmed: 30047584
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 12;7(15):20612-20
pubmed: 26967565
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422
pubmed: 27380959
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1459-1467
pubmed: 30348537
J Chromatogr Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;50(10):877-84
pubmed: 22689904
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Oct 1;94(10):735-742
pubmed: 27843163