Superiority of temozolomide over radiotherapy for elderly patients with RTK II methylation class, MGMT promoter methylated malignant astrocytoma.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
/ therapeutic use
Astrocytoma
/ drug therapy
Brain Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
DNA Copy Number Variations
DNA Methylation
DNA Modification Methylases
/ genetics
DNA Repair Enzymes
/ genetics
Glioblastoma
/ drug therapy
Humans
Promoter Regions, Genetic
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret
/ genetics
Temozolomide
/ therapeutic use
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
/ genetics
Zebrafish Proteins
/ genetics
MGMT
glioma
methylation classifier
radiotherapy
temozolomide
Journal
Neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1523-5866
Titre abrégé: Neuro Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 08 2020
17 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
entrez:
18
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
O6-methylguanine DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is predictive for alkylating chemotherapy, but there are non-benefiting subgroups. This is the long-term update of NOA-08 (NCT01502241), which compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT, n = 176) and temozolomide (TMZ, n = 193) at 7/14 days in patients >65 years old with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations were assessed in the biomarker cohort of 104 patients and in an independent cohort of 188 patients treated with RT+TMZ-containing regimens in Heidelberg. In the full NOA-08 cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 [7.0-10.0] months for TMZ treatment versus 9.4 [8.1-10.4] months for RT; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76-1.15) of TMZ versus RT. Median event-free survival (EFS) [3.4 (3.2-4.1) months vs 4.6 (4.2-5.0) months] did not differ, with HR = 1.02 (0.83-1.25). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors had markedly longer OS and EFS when treated with TMZ (18.4 [13.9-24.4] mo and 8.5 [6.9-13.3] mo) versus RT (9.6 [6.4-13.7] mo and 4.8 [4.3-6.2] mo, HR 0.44 [0.27-0.70], P < 0.001 for OS and 0.46 [0.29-0.73], P = 0.001 for EFS). Patients with glioblastomas of the methylation classes receptor tyrosine kinase I (RTK I) and mesenchymal subgroups lacked a prognostic impact of MGMT in both cohorts. MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice between RT and TMZ. It indicates favorable long-term outcome with initial TMZ monotherapy in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors primarily in the RTK II subgroup.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
O6-methylguanine DNA-methyl transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is predictive for alkylating chemotherapy, but there are non-benefiting subgroups.
METHODS
This is the long-term update of NOA-08 (NCT01502241), which compared efficacy and safety of radiotherapy (RT, n = 176) and temozolomide (TMZ, n = 193) at 7/14 days in patients >65 years old with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations were assessed in the biomarker cohort of 104 patients and in an independent cohort of 188 patients treated with RT+TMZ-containing regimens in Heidelberg.
RESULTS
In the full NOA-08 cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 [7.0-10.0] months for TMZ treatment versus 9.4 [8.1-10.4] months for RT; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76-1.15) of TMZ versus RT. Median event-free survival (EFS) [3.4 (3.2-4.1) months vs 4.6 (4.2-5.0) months] did not differ, with HR = 1.02 (0.83-1.25). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors had markedly longer OS and EFS when treated with TMZ (18.4 [13.9-24.4] mo and 8.5 [6.9-13.3] mo) versus RT (9.6 [6.4-13.7] mo and 4.8 [4.3-6.2] mo, HR 0.44 [0.27-0.70], P < 0.001 for OS and 0.46 [0.29-0.73], P = 0.001 for EFS). Patients with glioblastomas of the methylation classes receptor tyrosine kinase I (RTK I) and mesenchymal subgroups lacked a prognostic impact of MGMT in both cohorts.
CONCLUSION
MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice between RT and TMZ. It indicates favorable long-term outcome with initial TMZ monotherapy in patients with MGMT promoter-methylated tumors primarily in the RTK II subgroup.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32064499
pii: 5737806
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa033
pmc: PMC7594575
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
0
Zebrafish Proteins
0
DNA Modification Methylases
EC 2.1.1.-
MGMT protein, human
EC 2.1.1.63
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret
EC 2.7.10.1
Ret protein, zebrafish
EC 2.7.10.1
DNA Repair Enzymes
EC 6.5.1.-
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01502241']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1162-1172Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Oct;124(4):547-60
pubmed: 22810491
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Sep;13(9):916-26
pubmed: 22877848
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4085-91
pubmed: 24101040
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1583-8
pubmed: 15051755
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jan 22;20(2):174-183
pubmed: 29016815
Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Jul;10(7):372-85
pubmed: 24912512
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Feb 19;20(3):367-379
pubmed: 29016808
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Aug;15(8):1017-26
pubmed: 23595628
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Dec;16(12):1630-8
pubmed: 25028501
Cancer Cell. 2012 Oct 16;22(4):425-37
pubmed: 23079654
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):707-15
pubmed: 22578793
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e315-e329
pubmed: 28483413
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Sep;130(3):419-34
pubmed: 25931051
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 1;25(22):3357-61
pubmed: 17664483
J Stat Softw. 2012 Sep;50(11):1-23
pubmed: 25317082
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 16;376(11):1027-1037
pubmed: 28296618
Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):678-688
pubmed: 30782343
Neuro Oncol. 2018 May 18;20(6):826-837
pubmed: 29165638