Increased risk of cardiovascular mortality by strict glycemic control (pre-procedural HbA1c < 6.5%) in Japanese medically-treated diabetic patients following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up study.
Aged
Biomarkers
/ blood
Blood Glucose
/ drug effects
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ diagnosis
Cause of Death
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Databases, Factual
Diabetes Mellitus
/ blood
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ metabolism
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Japan
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Secondary Prevention
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Cardiovascular death
Diabetes
HbA1c
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Secondary prevention
Sudden death
Journal
Cardiovascular diabetology
ISSN: 1475-2840
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Diabetol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147637
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 02 2020
18 02 2020
Historique:
received:
05
11
2019
accepted:
03
02
2020
entrez:
20
2
2020
pubmed:
20
2
2020
medline:
1
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) disease in patients with diabetes, an optimal level of HbA1c, the most widely-used glycemic control indicator, for favorable clinical consequences still remains to be established. This study assessed the association between preprocedural HbA1c level and CV mortality in Japanese diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This is a retrospective observational study using a single-center prospective PCI database involving consecutive 4542 patients who underwent PCI between 2000 and 2016. Patients with any antidiabetic medication including insulin at PCI were included in the analysis (n = 1328). We divided the patients into 5 and 2 groups according to HbA1c level; HbA1c: < 6.5% (n = 267), 6.5-7.0% (n = 268), 7.0-7.5% (n = 262), 7.5-8.5% (n = 287) and ≥ 8.5% (n = 244), and 7.0% > and ≤ 7.0%, respectively. The primary outcome was CV mortality including sudden death. The median follow-up duration was 6.2 years. In the follow-up period, CV and sudden death occurred in 81 and 23 patients, respectively. While unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in cumulative CV mortality rate between patients binarized by preprocedural HbA1c 7.0%, analysis of the 5 groups of HbA1c showed significantly higher cumulative CV death in patients with HbA1c < 6.5% compared with those with 7.0-7.5% (P = 0.042). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between preprocedural HbA1c level and risk of CV death, and the lowest risk was in the HbA1c 7.0-7.5% group (Hazard ratio of HbA1c < 6.5% compared to 7.0-7.5%: 2.97, 95% confidence interval: 1.33-7.25, P = 0.007). Similarly, univariate analysis revealed the lowest risk of sudden death was in the HbA1c 7.0-7.5% group. The findings indicate an increased risk of CV mortality by strict glycemic control (HbA1c < 6.5%) in the secondary prevention of CV disease in Japanese patients with medically-treated diabetes. Trial registration This study reports the retrospective analysis of a prospective registry database of patients who underwent PCI at Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (Juntendo Physicians' Alliance for Clinical Trials, J-PACT), which is publicly registered (University Medical Information Network Japan-Clinical Trials Registry UMIN-CTR 000035587).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) disease in patients with diabetes, an optimal level of HbA1c, the most widely-used glycemic control indicator, for favorable clinical consequences still remains to be established. This study assessed the association between preprocedural HbA1c level and CV mortality in Japanese diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS
This is a retrospective observational study using a single-center prospective PCI database involving consecutive 4542 patients who underwent PCI between 2000 and 2016. Patients with any antidiabetic medication including insulin at PCI were included in the analysis (n = 1328). We divided the patients into 5 and 2 groups according to HbA1c level; HbA1c: < 6.5% (n = 267), 6.5-7.0% (n = 268), 7.0-7.5% (n = 262), 7.5-8.5% (n = 287) and ≥ 8.5% (n = 244), and 7.0% > and ≤ 7.0%, respectively. The primary outcome was CV mortality including sudden death. The median follow-up duration was 6.2 years.
RESULTS
In the follow-up period, CV and sudden death occurred in 81 and 23 patients, respectively. While unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in cumulative CV mortality rate between patients binarized by preprocedural HbA1c 7.0%, analysis of the 5 groups of HbA1c showed significantly higher cumulative CV death in patients with HbA1c < 6.5% compared with those with 7.0-7.5% (P = 0.042). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between preprocedural HbA1c level and risk of CV death, and the lowest risk was in the HbA1c 7.0-7.5% group (Hazard ratio of HbA1c < 6.5% compared to 7.0-7.5%: 2.97, 95% confidence interval: 1.33-7.25, P = 0.007). Similarly, univariate analysis revealed the lowest risk of sudden death was in the HbA1c 7.0-7.5% group.
CONCLUSION
The findings indicate an increased risk of CV mortality by strict glycemic control (HbA1c < 6.5%) in the secondary prevention of CV disease in Japanese patients with medically-treated diabetes. Trial registration This study reports the retrospective analysis of a prospective registry database of patients who underwent PCI at Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (Juntendo Physicians' Alliance for Clinical Trials, J-PACT), which is publicly registered (University Medical Information Network Japan-Clinical Trials Registry UMIN-CTR 000035587).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32070335
doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-00996-8
pii: 10.1186/s12933-020-00996-8
pmc: PMC7027034
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Blood Glucose
0
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
hemoglobin A1c protein, human
0
Banques de données
UMIN-CTR
['UMIN-CTR 000035587']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21Références
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 15;118(4):610-20
pubmed: 27342283
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1720-32
pubmed: 26510021
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):104-111
pubmed: 29127240
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Feb 28;18(1):22
pubmed: 30819191
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):69-79
pubmed: 30418475
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):129-39
pubmed: 19092145
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72
pubmed: 18539916
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Apr 19;154(8):554-9
pubmed: 21502652
N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86
pubmed: 8366922
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jan 7;43(1):8-14
pubmed: 14715174
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S61-S70
pubmed: 30559232
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):77-83
pubmed: 20937686
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 17;168(8):569-576
pubmed: 29507945
Circulation. 2011 Nov 29;124(22):2458-73
pubmed: 22052934
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1327-35
pubmed: 23992602
Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1904-1907
pubmed: 30354665
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 7;363(15):1410-8
pubmed: 20925543
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jun;5(6):423-430
pubmed: 28456416
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 24;380(4):347-357
pubmed: 30415602
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(8):1077-80
pubmed: 17867998
Diabetes. 2014 May;63(5):1738-47
pubmed: 24757202
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323
pubmed: 31497854
Crit Care Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):2262-7
pubmed: 17717490
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Jan 30;3(1):e000060
pubmed: 25664182
N Engl J Med. 1984 Feb 9;310(6):341-6
pubmed: 6690962
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53
pubmed: 9742976
Circ J. 2011;75(4):791-9
pubmed: 21427500
Diabet Med. 1997 Aug;14(8):648-54
pubmed: 9272590
Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1279-89
pubmed: 16214598
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 6;380(23):2215-2224
pubmed: 31167051
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1317-26
pubmed: 23992601
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):416-426
pubmed: 30104301
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59
pubmed: 18539917
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):503-9
pubmed: 25097197
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):481-9
pubmed: 20110121
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65
pubmed: 9742977
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 9;62(2):121-127
pubmed: 23665365
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2197-206
pubmed: 26039600
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Feb 24;17(1):33
pubmed: 29477146
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Jun;25(3):262-9
pubmed: 22376172
Diabetologia. 2018 Dec;61(12):2461-2498
pubmed: 30288571
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Jan 11;18(1):4
pubmed: 30634972
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
Kidney Int. 2008 May;73(9):1062-8
pubmed: 18288102
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995 May;28(2):103-17
pubmed: 7587918
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 28;171(21):1920-7
pubmed: 22123800
Diabetes Care. 2011 May;34 Suppl 2:S132-7
pubmed: 21525444
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jun 30;17(1):96
pubmed: 29960591
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4):
pubmed: 28373177
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 1;104(1):41-5
pubmed: 19576319
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):232-42
pubmed: 26052984
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Nov;16(11):3403-10
pubmed: 16162813
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 16;379(7):633-644
pubmed: 30110583
Diabetologia. 2004 Feb;47(2):312-5
pubmed: 14712347
Diabetes Care. 2012 Sep;35(9):1897-901
pubmed: 22699297
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Jul 17;11:82
pubmed: 22805289
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Mar;8(2):236-42
pubmed: 25561089