Brain tumour diagnostics using a DNA methylation-based classifier as a diagnostic support tool.
central nervous system tumours
diagnostics
methylation profiling
Journal
Neuropathology and applied neurobiology
ISSN: 1365-2990
Titre abrégé: Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
22
10
2019
revised:
13
02
2020
accepted:
15
02
2020
pubmed:
20
2
2020
medline:
26
8
2021
entrez:
20
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Methylation profiling (MP) is increasingly incorporated in the diagnostic process of central nervous system (CNS) tumours at our centres in The Netherlands and Scandinavia. We aimed to identify the benefits and challenges of MP as a support tool for CNS tumour diagnostics. About 502 CNS tumour samples were analysed using (850 k) MP. Profiles were matched with the DKFZ/Heidelberg CNS Tumour Classifier. For each case, the final pathological diagnosis was compared to the diagnosis before MP. In 54.4% (273/502) of all analysed cases, the suggested methylation class (calibrated score ≥0.9) corresponded with the initial pathological diagnosis. The diagnosis of 24.5% of these cases (67/273) was more refined after incorporation of the MP result. In 9.8% of cases (49/502), the MP result led to a new diagnosis, resulting in an altered WHO grade in 71.4% of these cases (35/49). In 1% of cases (5/502), the suggested class based on MP was initially disregarded/interpreted as misleading, but in retrospect, the MP result predicted the right diagnosis for three of these cases. In six cases, the suggested class was interpreted as 'discrepant but noncontributory'. The remaining 33.7% of cases (169/502) had a calibrated score <0.9, including 7.8% (39/502) for which no class indication was given at all (calibrated score <0.3). MP is a powerful tool to confirm and fine-tune the pathological diagnosis of CNS tumours, and to avoid misdiagnoses. However, it is crucial to interpret the results in the context of clinical, radiological, histopathological and other molecular information.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32072658
doi: 10.1111/nan.12610
pmc: PMC7496466
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
478-492Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Neuropathological Society.
Références
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):181-210
pubmed: 29967940
Cancer Cell. 2010 May 18;17(5):510-22
pubmed: 20399149
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):997-1003
pubmed: 15758010
Cancer Cell. 2015 May 11;27(5):728-43
pubmed: 25965575
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2020 Aug;46(5):478-492
pubmed: 32072658
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):682-694
pubmed: 28314689
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Sep;138(3):497-504
pubmed: 31250151
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2020 Feb;46(1):28-47
pubmed: 31955441
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Nov;136(5):805-810
pubmed: 30259105
Mod Pathol. 2014 Feb;27(2):168-74
pubmed: 23887293
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Aug;138(2):309-326
pubmed: 31076851
Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1265-1278
pubmed: 31124566
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):273-291
pubmed: 29564591
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019 Feb 20;7(1):24
pubmed: 30786920
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):327-337
pubmed: 29881993
Brain Pathol. 2014 Sep;24(5):429-35
pubmed: 24990071
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007 Jun;66(6):545-51
pubmed: 17549014
Clin Epigenetics. 2015 Jul 09;7:62
pubmed: 26157508
Clin Epigenetics. 2019 Dec 5;11(1):185
pubmed: 31806041
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Feb;4(2):121-130
pubmed: 31786093