Peer teacher training (PTT) in action.


Journal

The clinical teacher
ISSN: 1743-498X
Titre abrégé: Clin Teach
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101227511

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 23 2 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 22 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The benefits of peer teaching for tutors, students and institutions are well documented. Skills in peer teaching, assessment and feedback are cited as important graduate attributes by international medical councils; however, the literature on preparation for this role, specifically peer teacher training (PTT), is sparse. This study evaluated the implementation of a PTT programme adopted from the Medical School at the University of Sydney in 2016. The programme was adopted to support the development of skills in UK medical undergraduates. The training was accessed by students studying at the University of Leicester in 2017 and 2018. The course was evaluated using mixed methods. Students completed pre- and post-course self-rated questionnaires. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted after each course to investigate students' perceptions. Twenty fourth-year medical students attended the PTT. Students reported improvements in their understanding of educational principles, confidence in teaching and feedback skills, and an increased likelihood of volunteering to teach. Focus groups revealed potential benefits for future patient interaction and preparation for educator roles. The PTT provided an effective approach for medical students to gain perceived competence and confidence in teaching and giving feedback. Students reported an increased propensity for teaching when qualified. Students with lower self-reported teaching ability reported greater improvements following the course. Students reported unanticipated perceived benefits for improving patient education and obtaining teaching accreditation for their portfolio and future clinical roles. They perceived potential value if the training were to be made interprofessional on future courses. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the transferability of the PTT programme across university settings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The benefits of peer teaching for tutors, students and institutions are well documented. Skills in peer teaching, assessment and feedback are cited as important graduate attributes by international medical councils; however, the literature on preparation for this role, specifically peer teacher training (PTT), is sparse. This study evaluated the implementation of a PTT programme adopted from the Medical School at the University of Sydney in 2016. The programme was adopted to support the development of skills in UK medical undergraduates. The training was accessed by students studying at the University of Leicester in 2017 and 2018.
METHODS
The course was evaluated using mixed methods. Students completed pre- and post-course self-rated questionnaires. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted after each course to investigate students' perceptions.
RESULTS
Twenty fourth-year medical students attended the PTT. Students reported improvements in their understanding of educational principles, confidence in teaching and feedback skills, and an increased likelihood of volunteering to teach. Focus groups revealed potential benefits for future patient interaction and preparation for educator roles.
DISCUSSION
The PTT provided an effective approach for medical students to gain perceived competence and confidence in teaching and giving feedback. Students reported an increased propensity for teaching when qualified. Students with lower self-reported teaching ability reported greater improvements following the course. Students reported unanticipated perceived benefits for improving patient education and obtaining teaching accreditation for their portfolio and future clinical roles. They perceived potential value if the training were to be made interprofessional on future courses. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the transferability of the PTT programme across university settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32080969
doi: 10.1111/tct.13142
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

531-537

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Références

Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG. Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011;2:157-172.
Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C. Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:115.
Lockspeiser TM, O'Sullivan P, Teherani A, Muller J. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Heal Sci Educ 2008;13(3):361-372.
Darling-Hammond L, Holtzman DJ, Gatlin SJ, Vasquez Heilig J. Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for america, and teacher effectiveness. Educ Policy Anal Arch 2005;13:42.
Burgess A, McGregor D. Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:263.
Burgess A, Roberts C, van Diggele C, Mellis C. Peer teacher training (PTT) program for health professional students: interprofessional and flipped learning. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:239.
Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P, Schofield T. The new consultation: developing doctor-patient communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
Peyton JWR. Teaching & learning in medical practice. Rickmansworth, UK: Manticore Europe Ltd; 1998.
Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2015.
Schuetz E, Obirei B, Salat D, Scholz J, Hann D, Dethleffsen K. A large-scale peer teaching programme - acceptance and benefit. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2017;125:71-79.

Auteurs

Chiraag Karia (C)

University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Elizabeth Anderson (E)

Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK.

Andrew Hughes (A)

University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Judith West (J)

Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK.

Dilesh Lakhani (D)

University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Joanne Kirtley (J)

University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Annette Burgess (A)

School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Health Professional Education Research Network (SHERN), University of Sydney, Australia.

Sue Carr (S)

University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH