Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA 400 Units in Patients with Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: Final Report of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with an Open-Label Extension Phase.
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
/ administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Spasticity
/ drug therapy
Neuromuscular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Stroke
/ complications
Stroke Rehabilitation
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Upper Extremity
/ physiopathology
botulinum toxin
randomized controlled trial
stroke
upper limb spasticity
Journal
Toxins
ISSN: 2072-6651
Titre abrégé: Toxins (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101530765
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 02 2020
18 02 2020
Historique:
received:
24
12
2019
revised:
13
02
2020
accepted:
14
02
2020
entrez:
23
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
23
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In many countries, 400 units (U) is the maximum dose of onabotulinumtoxinA available to treat upper limb spasticity, but few studies have demonstrated the optimal use of this dose. In the double-blind phase of this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of 400 vs. 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Both groups received 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA injected in the forearm. An additional 160 U onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) or placebo (240 U group) was injected in the elbow flexors. Both groups showed similar muscle tone reduction in the wrist, fingers, and thumb; muscle tone reduction in the elbow flexors was greater in the group treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) compared to placebo (240 U group). Functional disabilities improved in both groups. No substantial difference was found in safety profiles. In the subsequent open-label phase, all participants received repeat injections of 400 U onabotulinumtoxinA (target muscles and doses per muscle determined by the physician). Similar efficacy and safety outcomes, as with the 400 U group in the double-blind phase, were confirmed. This final report demonstrates that injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 400 U relieves muscle tone in a wide range of areas and improves functional disabilities; generally, it was well-tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. The dosing data in the open-label phase will inform optimal use of onabotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261167).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32085529
pii: toxins12020127
doi: 10.3390/toxins12020127
pmc: PMC7077183
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Neuromuscular Agents
0
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
EC 3.4.24.69
onabotulinum toxin A
EC 3.4.24.69
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03261167']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : GlaxoSmithKline K.K.
ID : NA
Pays : International
Références
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Aug;86(8):656-61
pubmed: 17667196
PM R. 2012 Jan;4(1):4-10
pubmed: 22200567
Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1997;6:S208-20
pubmed: 9826992
Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7
pubmed: 3809245
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Aug;26(8):1983-92
pubmed: 20569068
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2014 May;121(5):521-30
pubmed: 24407377
J Anat. 2017 Jan;230(1):106-116
pubmed: 27595994
Mov Disord. 2005 Aug;20(8):1014-20
pubmed: 15858801
Biologics. 2014 Oct 06;8:227-41
pubmed: 25336912
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;83(10):1349-54
pubmed: 12370866
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):
pubmed: 23794582
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17 Suppl 2:1-8
pubmed: 20633176
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Aug;17 Suppl 2:74-93
pubmed: 20633180
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;87(4):305-10; quiz 311, 329
pubmed: 18437721
Somatosens Mot Res. 2018 Sep - Dec;35(3-4):218-222
pubmed: 30592432