Association between ethnicity and under-5 mortality: analysis of data from demographic surveys from 36 low-income and middle-income countries.
Journal
The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
received:
17
10
2019
revised:
02
12
2019
accepted:
10
01
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
23
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for stratification of social indicators by ethnic groups; however, no recent multicountry analyses on ethnicity and child survival have been done in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys collected between 2010 and 2016, from LMICs that provided birth histories and information on ethnicity or a proxy variable. We calculated neonatal (age 0-27 days), post-neonatal (age 28-364 days), child (age 1-4 years), and under-5 mortality rates (U5MRs) for each ethnic group within each country. We assessed differences in mortality between ethnic groups using a likelihood ratio test, Theil's index, and between-group variance. We used multivariable analyses of U5MR by ethnicity to adjust for household wealth, maternal education, and urban-rural residence. We included data from 36 LMICs, which included 2 812 381 livebirths among 415 ethnic groups. In 25 countries, significant differences in U5MR by ethnic group were identified (all p<0·05 likelihood ratio test). In these countries, the median mortality ratio between the ethnic groups with the highest and lowest U5MRs was 3·3 (IQR 2·1-5·2; range 1·5-8·5), whereas among the remaining 11 countries, the median U5MR ratio was 1·9 (IQR 1·7-2·5; range 1·4-10·0). Ethnic gaps were wider for child mortality than for neonatal or post-neonatal mortality. In nearly all countries, adjustment for wealth, education, and place of residence did not affect ethnic gaps in mortality, with the exception of Guatemala, India, Laos, and Nigeria. The largest ethnic group did not have the lowest U5MR in any of the countries studied. Significant ethnic disparities in child survival were identified in more than two-thirds of the countries studied. Regular analyses of ethnic disparities are essential for monitoring trends, targeting, and assessing the impact of health interventions. Such analyses will contribute to the effort towards leaving no one behind, which is at the centre of the SDGs. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UNICEF, Wellcome Trust, Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for stratification of social indicators by ethnic groups; however, no recent multicountry analyses on ethnicity and child survival have been done in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).
METHODS
We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys collected between 2010 and 2016, from LMICs that provided birth histories and information on ethnicity or a proxy variable. We calculated neonatal (age 0-27 days), post-neonatal (age 28-364 days), child (age 1-4 years), and under-5 mortality rates (U5MRs) for each ethnic group within each country. We assessed differences in mortality between ethnic groups using a likelihood ratio test, Theil's index, and between-group variance. We used multivariable analyses of U5MR by ethnicity to adjust for household wealth, maternal education, and urban-rural residence.
FINDINGS
We included data from 36 LMICs, which included 2 812 381 livebirths among 415 ethnic groups. In 25 countries, significant differences in U5MR by ethnic group were identified (all p<0·05 likelihood ratio test). In these countries, the median mortality ratio between the ethnic groups with the highest and lowest U5MRs was 3·3 (IQR 2·1-5·2; range 1·5-8·5), whereas among the remaining 11 countries, the median U5MR ratio was 1·9 (IQR 1·7-2·5; range 1·4-10·0). Ethnic gaps were wider for child mortality than for neonatal or post-neonatal mortality. In nearly all countries, adjustment for wealth, education, and place of residence did not affect ethnic gaps in mortality, with the exception of Guatemala, India, Laos, and Nigeria. The largest ethnic group did not have the lowest U5MR in any of the countries studied.
INTERPRETATION
Significant ethnic disparities in child survival were identified in more than two-thirds of the countries studied. Regular analyses of ethnic disparities are essential for monitoring trends, targeting, and assessing the impact of health interventions. Such analyses will contribute to the effort towards leaving no one behind, which is at the centre of the SDGs.
FUNDING
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UNICEF, Wellcome Trust, Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32087172
pii: S2214-109X(20)30025-5
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30025-5
pmc: PMC7034191
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e352-e361Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Am Econ Rev. ;92(5):1308-34
pubmed: 29058397
Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):818-25
pubmed: 16571702
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;45(5):1404-1405e
pubmed: 27694569
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;30(5):925-7
pubmed: 11689494
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 28;15:18
pubmed: 26822991
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Feb;42(3):399-420
pubmed: 8658234
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001391
pubmed: 23667333
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):30-41
pubmed: 10686731
Vaccine. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):169-75
pubmed: 18789997
East Afr Med J. 2006 May;83(5):259-66
pubmed: 16866220
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Aug;38(2):96-109
pubmed: 26581050
Am J Public Health. 2008 Apr;98(4):692-68
pubmed: 17761568
Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):277-84
pubmed: 12554585
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2016 May;8(2):89-124
pubmed: 27158418
J Health Econ. 2007 Mar 1;26(2):213-32
pubmed: 16962191
Br Med Bull. 2010;93:7-26
pubmed: 20007188
Lancet. 2016 Jul 9;388(10040):131-57
pubmed: 27108232
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014 Jan;26(1):67-76
pubmed: 23420055
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Oct;25(5):966-72
pubmed: 8921482
Lancet. 2009 Sep 5;374(9692):835-46
pubmed: 19709729
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jan;6(1):e39-e56
pubmed: 29153766
Ethn Health. 2015;20(2):145-62
pubmed: 24593689
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Aug;6(8):e902-e913
pubmed: 30012271
PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001289
pubmed: 22952435
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;30(5):1001-8
pubmed: 11689511
BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 02;11:683
pubmed: 21888632
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1602-13
pubmed: 23148108