Biased visibility in Hi-C datasets marks dynamically regulated condensed and decondensed chromatin states genome-wide.


Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2020
Historique:
received: 10 09 2019
accepted: 13 02 2020
entrez: 24 2 2020
pubmed: 24 2 2020
medline: 3 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Proximity ligation based techniques, like Hi-C, involve restriction digestion followed by ligation of formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin. Distinct chromatin states can impact the restriction digestion, and hence the visibility in the contact maps, of engaged loci. Yet, the extent and the potential impact of digestion bias remain obscure and under-appreciated in the literature. Through analysis of 45 Hi-C datasets, lamina-associated domains (LADs), inactive X-chromosome in mammals, and polytene bands in fly, we first established that the DNA in condensed chromatin had lesser accessibility to restriction endonucleases used in Hi-C as compared to that in decondensed chromatin. The observed bias was independent of known systematic biases, was not appropriately corrected by existing computational methods, and needed an additional optimization step. We then repurposed this bias to identify novel condensed domains outside LADs, which were bordered by insulators and were dynamically associated with the polycomb mediated epigenetic and transcriptional states during development. Our observations suggest that the corrected one-dimensional read counts of existing Hi-C datasets can be reliably repurposed to study the gene-regulatory dynamics associated with chromatin condensation and decondensation, and that the existing Hi-C datasets should be interpreted with cautions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Proximity ligation based techniques, like Hi-C, involve restriction digestion followed by ligation of formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin. Distinct chromatin states can impact the restriction digestion, and hence the visibility in the contact maps, of engaged loci. Yet, the extent and the potential impact of digestion bias remain obscure and under-appreciated in the literature.
RESULTS RESULTS
Through analysis of 45 Hi-C datasets, lamina-associated domains (LADs), inactive X-chromosome in mammals, and polytene bands in fly, we first established that the DNA in condensed chromatin had lesser accessibility to restriction endonucleases used in Hi-C as compared to that in decondensed chromatin. The observed bias was independent of known systematic biases, was not appropriately corrected by existing computational methods, and needed an additional optimization step. We then repurposed this bias to identify novel condensed domains outside LADs, which were bordered by insulators and were dynamically associated with the polycomb mediated epigenetic and transcriptional states during development.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our observations suggest that the corrected one-dimensional read counts of existing Hi-C datasets can be reliably repurposed to study the gene-regulatory dynamics associated with chromatin condensation and decondensation, and that the existing Hi-C datasets should be interpreted with cautions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32087673
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6580-6
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-6580-6
pmc: PMC7036197
doi:

Substances chimiques

Chromatin 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

175

Subventions

Organisme : Science and Engineering Research Board
ID : EMR/2015/001681
Organisme : Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology
ID : BT/PR16366/BID/7/598/2016
Organisme : Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology
ID : BT/PR13596/GET/119/31/2015
Organisme : Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology
ID : BT/PR8688/AGR/36/755/2013
Organisme : Indian Council of Medical Research
ID : F.No.90/09/2012/SCRT(TF)/BMS

Références

Genome Biol. 2016 Aug 31;17(1):182
pubmed: 27582050
Nat Genet. 2006 Nov;38(11):1348-54
pubmed: 17033623
Cell. 2014 Dec 18;159(7):1665-80
pubmed: 25497547
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):948-51
pubmed: 18463634
Cell. 2017 May 18;169(5):930-944.e22
pubmed: 28525758
Genes Dev. 2014 Oct 1;28(19):2151-62
pubmed: 25274727
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;798:531-42
pubmed: 22130859
PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002090
pubmed: 21655081
Cell. 2016 Mar 10;164(6):1110-1121
pubmed: 26967279
Methods. 2017 Jul 1;123:56-65
pubmed: 28435001
Science. 2009 Oct 9;326(5950):289-93
pubmed: 19815776
EMBO J. 2017 Oct 2;36(19):2829-2843
pubmed: 28814448
Genome Res. 2019 Dec;29(12):1985-1995
pubmed: 31511305
Science. 2019 Dec 13;366(6471):1338-1345
pubmed: 31753851
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 11;112(32):E4428-37
pubmed: 26216945
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 2;45(19):11070-11087
pubmed: 28977418
BMC Genomics. 2012 Aug 30;13:436
pubmed: 22935139
Nat Genet. 2011 Oct 16;43(11):1059-65
pubmed: 22001755
Nature. 2017 Mar 23;543(7646):519-524
pubmed: 28273065
Cell Rep. 2016 May 31;15(9):2038-49
pubmed: 27210764
Mol Cell. 2018 Sep 6;71(5):802-815.e7
pubmed: 30201095
BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 15;15:1104
pubmed: 25494698
Nature. 2014 Nov 20;515(7527):402-5
pubmed: 25409831
Nature. 2017 Jul 5;547(7661):61-67
pubmed: 28682332
Methods. 2012 Nov;58(3):192-203
pubmed: 22903059
J Mol Biol. 2015 Feb 13;427(3):608-25
pubmed: 25280896
Science. 2014 Dec 5;346(6214):1238-42
pubmed: 25477464
Cell. 2015 Nov 5;163(4):934-46
pubmed: 26544940
Cell. 2017 Jul 13;170(2):367-381.e20
pubmed: 28709003
Biophys J. 2017 May 23;112(10):2051-2055
pubmed: 28487148
Nature. 2017 Apr 6;544(7648):110-114
pubmed: 28355183
Science. 2019 Dec 13;366(6471):1345-1349
pubmed: 31780627
Genome Biol. 2015 Aug 03;16:145
pubmed: 26235388
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 22;113(12):E1691-700
pubmed: 26957603
Cell. 2015 Dec 3;163(6):1333-47
pubmed: 26607792
Genome Res. 2006 Oct;16(10):1299-309
pubmed: 16954542
Genome Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):24-32
pubmed: 19056695
Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 5;8(1):441
pubmed: 28874668
Genome Res. 2019 Feb;29(2):236-249
pubmed: 30655336
Dev Cell. 2009 Mar;16(3):466-81
pubmed: 19289091
Genome Biol. 2019 Sep 13;20(1):198
pubmed: 31519205
Mol Cell. 2010 May 28;38(4):603-13
pubmed: 20513434
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Dec;17(12):772
pubmed: 28704353
J Mol Biol. 2012 Mar 30;417(3):152-64
pubmed: 22310051
Science. 2018 Apr 6;360(6384):102-105
pubmed: 29472443
Nature. 2012 Apr 11;485(7398):376-80
pubmed: 22495300
Genes Dev. 2014 Dec 15;28(24):2778-91
pubmed: 25512564
Cell. 2017 May 18;169(5):780-791
pubmed: 28525751
Genes Dev. 2004 May 15;18(10):1119-30
pubmed: 15155579
Genome Biol. 2015 Aug 26;16:175
pubmed: 26306623
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 1;28(23):3131-3
pubmed: 23023982
Science. 2002 Feb 15;295(5558):1306-11
pubmed: 11847345
Nat Genet. 2006 Nov;38(11):1341-7
pubmed: 17033624
Genome Res. 2014 Dec;24(12):1905-17
pubmed: 25228660
BMC Biol. 2018 Aug 7;16(1):87
pubmed: 30086749
Cell Rep. 2018 Jul 3;24(1):1-10.e4
pubmed: 29972771
Genome Biol. 2015 Aug 07;16:152
pubmed: 26248554
Mol Cell. 2016 Jun 2;62(5):668-80
pubmed: 27259200
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Feb 20;47(3):1239-1254
pubmed: 30496478
Cell. 2017 Oct 19;171(3):557-572.e24
pubmed: 29053968
Nat Genet. 2010 Jan;42(1):4; author reply 5-6
pubmed: 20037608
Nature. 2017 Nov 2;551(7678):51-56
pubmed: 29094699
Nat Methods. 2012 Oct;9(10):999-1003
pubmed: 22941365
Mol Syst Biol. 2015 Dec 23;11(12):852
pubmed: 26700852

Auteurs

Keerthivasan Raanin Chandradoss (KR)

Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) - Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, 140306, India.

Prashanth Kumar Guthikonda (PK)

Department of Animal Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad (UoH), Central University, Prof. CN Rao Road, P O, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500046, India.

Srinivas Kethavath (S)

Department of Animal Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad (UoH), Central University, Prof. CN Rao Road, P O, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500046, India.

Monika Dass (M)

Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) - Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, 140306, India.

Harpreet Singh (H)

Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) - Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, 140306, India.

Rakhee Nayak (R)

Department of Animal Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad (UoH), Central University, Prof. CN Rao Road, P O, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500046, India.

Sreenivasulu Kurukuti (S)

Department of Animal Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad (UoH), Central University, Prof. CN Rao Road, P O, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500046, India. skurukuti@uohyd.ac.in.

Kuljeet Singh Sandhu (KS)

Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) - Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, 140306, India. sandhuks@iisermohali.ac.in.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH