Expression of attack and growth phase genes of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus in the presence of Gram-negative and Gram-positive prey.


Journal

Microbiological research
ISSN: 1618-0623
Titre abrégé: Microbiol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9437794

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2020
Historique:
received: 04 12 2019
revised: 10 02 2020
accepted: 11 02 2020
pubmed: 24 2 2020
medline: 13 11 2020
entrez: 24 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The expression of attack phase (AP) and growth phase (GP) genes of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus (B. bacteriovorus) was compared in the presence of Gram-negative [Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae)] and Gram-positive [Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium)] prey, using relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction (relative qPCR) assays. The genes bd0108 (pili retraction/extrusion) and merRNA (massively expressed riboswitch RNA) were highly expressed in the AP cells [3.99- to 6.06-fold (E. coli), 3.91- to 7.05-fold (K. pneumoniae) and 2.91- to 7.30-fold (E. faecium)]. The fliC1 gene (flagella filament) was also expressed at a high level in the AP cells however, after 240 min of co-culture with E. faecium the expression of fliC1 remained low (at 0.759-fold), while in the presence of the Gram-negative prey fliC1 expression increased. Additionally, the GP genes bd0816 (peptidoglycan-modifying enzyme) and groES1 (chaperone protein) were not induced in the presence of E. faecium. However, they were expressed in the early GP and GP of B. bacteriovorus after exposure to the Gram-negative prey. It can thus be concluded that B. bacteriovorus senses the presence of potential prey when exposed to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, however the GP genes are not induced in co-culture with E. faecium. The results from this study thus indicate that B. bacteriovorus does not actively grow in the presence of E. faecium and the second predatory cue (induces active growth of B. bacteriovorus) is lacking when B. bacteriovorus is co-cultured with the Gram-positive prey.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32088503
pii: S0944-5013(19)31377-1
doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126437
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bacterial Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

126437

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Auteurs

Monique Waso (M)

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.

Sehaam Khan (S)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 17011, Doornfontein, 2028, South Africa.

Warish Ahmed (W)

CSIRO Land and Water, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Queensland, 4102, Australia.

Wesaal Khan (W)

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa. Electronic address: wesaal@sun.ac.za.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria

Two codependent routes lead to high-level MRSA.

Abimbola Feyisara Adedeji-Olulana, Katarzyna Wacnik, Lucia Lafage et al.
1.00
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Penicillin-Binding Proteins Peptidoglycan Bacterial Proteins Anti-Bacterial Agents

A cross-systems primer for synthetic microbial communities.

Elijah C Mehlferber, Gontran Arnault, Bishnu Joshi et al.
1.00
Microbiota Synthetic Biology Microbial Consortia Humans Microbial Interactions
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Animals Guinea Pigs Bacterial Proteins Toxin-Antitoxin Systems

Classifications MeSH