Evaluation of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short type double balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a single-center retrospective study of 1,576 procedures.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
/ adverse effects
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal
/ adverse effects
Female
Gastroenterostomy
Humans
Intestinal Perforation
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Safety
Billroth II gastrectomy
ERCP
Roux-en-Y reconstruction
adverse events
complications
double-balloon endoscope
Journal
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN: 1440-1746
Titre abrégé: J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 8607909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
10
01
2020
revised:
23
02
2020
accepted:
25
02
2020
pubmed:
28
2
2020
medline:
4
11
2020
entrez:
28
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using balloon-assisted endoscope such as double-balloon endoscope is even effective for patients with surgically altered anatomy. Yet comprehensive studies on complications of ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscope have not been made. We analyzed the characteristics and the causes of complications of ERCP using double-balloon endoscope (DB-ERCP) procedures and aimed to suggest effective managements. A total of 1576 procedures of DB-ERCP in 714 patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy in our hospital were evaluated retrospectively using a statistic analysis. The overall complication occurrence rate was 5.8%. By type of complications are perforation 3.2%, mucosal laceration 0.5%, hemorrhage 1.0%, pancreatitis 0.6%, respiratory disorder 0.4%, and others 0.2%. By type of surgical reconstruction methods were Roux-en-Y reconstruction with choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 4.2%, Roux-en-Y reconstruction without choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 6.7%, pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.5%, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.2%, Billroth II gastrectomy (B-II) 11.6%, and other reconstruction method (others) 7.4%. The contributing factors calculated by a multivariate analysis were B-II (odds ratio: 1.864, 95% confidence interval: 1.001-3.471, P = 0.050) and the presence of naïve papilla (odds ratio: 3.268, 95% confidence interval: 1.426-7.490, P = 0.005). DB-ERCP is a safe method with a total complication rate of 5.8% that could be considered within an acceptable range. The most common complication was the injury of the digestive tract such as perforation. Affecting risk factors for complications were B-II and the presence of naïve papilla. DB-ERCP procedures should be performed carefully of these factors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using balloon-assisted endoscope such as double-balloon endoscope is even effective for patients with surgically altered anatomy. Yet comprehensive studies on complications of ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscope have not been made. We analyzed the characteristics and the causes of complications of ERCP using double-balloon endoscope (DB-ERCP) procedures and aimed to suggest effective managements.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 1576 procedures of DB-ERCP in 714 patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy in our hospital were evaluated retrospectively using a statistic analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The overall complication occurrence rate was 5.8%. By type of complications are perforation 3.2%, mucosal laceration 0.5%, hemorrhage 1.0%, pancreatitis 0.6%, respiratory disorder 0.4%, and others 0.2%. By type of surgical reconstruction methods were Roux-en-Y reconstruction with choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 4.2%, Roux-en-Y reconstruction without choledocho-jejunal anastomosis 6.7%, pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.5%, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy 4.2%, Billroth II gastrectomy (B-II) 11.6%, and other reconstruction method (others) 7.4%. The contributing factors calculated by a multivariate analysis were B-II (odds ratio: 1.864, 95% confidence interval: 1.001-3.471, P = 0.050) and the presence of naïve papilla (odds ratio: 3.268, 95% confidence interval: 1.426-7.490, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
DB-ERCP is a safe method with a total complication rate of 5.8% that could be considered within an acceptable range. The most common complication was the injury of the digestive tract such as perforation. Affecting risk factors for complications were B-II and the presence of naïve papilla. DB-ERCP procedures should be performed carefully of these factors.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1387-1396Informations de copyright
© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Cotton PB, Blumgart LH, Davies GT et al. Cannulation of papilla of vater via fiber-duodenoscope: assessment of retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 60 patients. Lancet 1972; 1: 53-58.
Takagi K, Ikeda S, Nakagawa Y, Sakaguchi N, Takahashi T. Retrograde pancreatography and cholangiography by fiber duodenoscope. Gastroenterology 1970; 59: 445-452.
Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 61: 112-125.
Suissa A, Yassin K, Lavy A et al. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study. Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52: 352-355.
Forbes A, Cotton PB. ERCP and sphincterotomy after Billroth II gastrectomy. Gut 1984; 25: 971-974.
Shimatani M, Matsushita M, Takaoka M et al. Effective "short" double-balloon enteroscope for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a large case series. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 849-854.
Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Ikeura T, Mitsuyama T, Okazaki K. Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a newly developed short-type single-balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig. Endosc. 2014; 26: 147-155.
Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 53: 216-220.
Kobayashi K, Haruki S, Sada M, Katsumata T, Saigenji K. Single-balloon enteroscopy. Nihon Rinsho 2008; 66: 1371-1378.
Upchurch BR, Vargo JJ. Single-balloon enteroscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 2009; 19: 335-347.
Cho S, Kamalaporn P, Kandel G, Kortan P, Marcon N, May G. 'Short' double-balloon enteroscope endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with a surgically altered upper gastrointestinal tract. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 25: 615-619.
De Koning M, Moreels TG. Comparison of double-balloon and single-balloon enteroscope for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography after Roux-en-Y small bowel surgery. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016; 16: 98.
Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A et al. Long- and short-type double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted therapeutic ERCP for intact papilla in patients with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25: 713-721.
Katanuma A, Isayama H. Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy in Japan: questionnaire survey and important discussion points at Endoscopic Forum Japan 2013. Dig. Endosc. 2014; 26: 109-115.
Kato H, Tsutsumi K, Harada R, Okada H, Yamamoto K. Short double-balloon enteroscopy is feasible and effective for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig. Endosc. 2014; 26: 130-135.
Koshitani T, Matsuda S, Takai K et al. Direct cholangioscopy combined with double-balloon enteroscope-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 18: 3765-3769.
Monkemuller K, Bellutti M, Neumann H, Malfertheiner P. Therapeutic ERCP with the double-balloon enteroscope in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2008; 67: 992-996.
Monkemuller K, Fry LC, Bellutti M, Neumann H, Malfertheiner P. ERCP with the double balloon enteroscope in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 1961-1967.
Moreels TG, Pelckmans PA. Comparison between double-balloon and single-balloon enteroscopy in therapeutic ERC after Roux-en-Y entero-enteric anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 2: 314-317.
Osoegawa T, Motomura Y, Akahoshi K et al. Improved techniques for double-balloon-enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 18: 6843-6849.
Parlak E, Cicek B, Disibeyaz S et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography by double balloon enteroscopy in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Surg. Endosc. 2010; 24: 466-470.
Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Matsushita M, Okazaki K. Endoscopic approaches for pancreatobiliary diseases in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig. Endosc. 2014; 26: 70-78.
Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Okazaki K. Tips for double balloon enteroscopy in patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction and modified child surgery. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2014; 21: E22-E28.
Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Tokuhara M, Miyoshi H, Ikeura T, Okazaki K. Review of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using several endoscopic methods in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 7: 617-627.
Shimatani M, Tokuhara M, Kato K et al. Utility of newly developed short-type double-balloon endoscopy for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in postoperative patients. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017; 32: 1348-1354.
Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001; 54: 425-434.
Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Same-day discharge after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: observations from a prospective multicenter complication study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1999; 49: 580-586.
Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 335: 909-918.
Katsinelos P, Lazaraki G, Chatzimavroudis G et al. Risk factors for therapeutic ERCP-related complications: an analysis of 2,715 cases performed by a single endoscopist. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2014; 27: 65-72.
Lee MH, Tsou YK, Lin CH et al. Predictors of re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis for delayed post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 22: 3196-3201.
Morgan KA, Fontenot BB, Ruddy JM, Mickey S, Adams DB. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography gut perforations: when to wait! When to operate! Am. Surg. 2009; 75: 477-483 discussion 483-474.
Park SM. Recent advanced endoscopic management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related duodenal perforations. Clin Endosc. 2016; 49: 376-382.
Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M et al. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 693-711.
Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann. Surg. 2000; 232: 191-198.
Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: diagnosis and management. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 7: 1135-1141.
Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status-historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 373-379.
Miyoshi H, Shimatani M, Kato K et al. Transcutaneous monitoring of partial pressure of carbon dioxide during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a double-balloon endoscope with carbon dioxide insufflation under conscious sedation. Dig. Endosc. 2014; 26: 436-441.
Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 71: 446-454.
Chua TJ, Kaffes AJ. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy in patients with surgically altered anatomy: a liver transplant center experience (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 76: 887-891.
Moreels TG, Hubens GJ, Ysebaert DK, Op de Beeck B, Pelckmans PA. Diagnostic and therapeutic double-balloon enteroscopy after small bowel Roux-en-Y reconstructive surgery. Digestion 2009; 80: 141-147.
Raithel M, Dormann H, Naegel A et al. Double-balloon-enteroscopy-based endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in post-surgical patients. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 17: 2302-2314.
Shah RJ, Smolkin M, Yen R et al. A multicenter, U.S. experience of single-balloon, double-balloon, and rotational overtube-assisted enteroscopy ERCP in patients with surgically altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 77: 593-600.
Siddiqui AA, Chaaya A, Shelton C et al. Utility of the short double-balloon enteroscope to perform pancreaticobiliary interventions in patients with surgically altered anatomy in a US multicenter study. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013; 58: 858-864.
Wang AY, Sauer BG, Behm BW et al. Single-balloon enteroscopy effectively enables diagnostic and therapeutic retrograde cholangiography in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010; 71: 641-649.
Shimatani M, Hatanaka H, Kogure H et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography using a short-type double-balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 111: 1750-1758.
Patel MK, Horsley-Silva JL, Gomez V, Stauffer JA, Stark ME, Lukens FJ. Double balloon enteroscopy procedure in patients with surgically altered bowel anatomy: analysis of a large prospectively collected database. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2013; 23: 409-413.
Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A et al. Single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y anastomosis (with video). Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 93-99.