Unravelling the complex story of intergenomic recombination in ABB allotriploid bananas.
Musa
Genetic diversity
homologous exchanges
meiosis
polyploids
subgenomes
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2021
01 01 2021
Historique:
received:
31
10
2019
accepted:
25
02
2020
pubmed:
28
2
2020
medline:
28
1
2021
entrez:
28
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bananas (Musa spp.) are a major staple food for hundreds of millions of people in developing countries. The cultivated varieties are seedless and parthenocarpic clones of which the ancestral origin remains to be clarified. The most important cultivars are triploids with an AAA, AAB or ABB genome constitution, with A and B genomes provided by M. acuminata and M. balbisiana, respectively. Previous studies suggested that inter-genome recombinations were relatively common in banana cultivars and that triploids were more likely to have passed through an intermediate hybrid. In this study, we investigated the chromosome structure within the ABB group, composed of starchy cooking bananas that play an important role in food security. Using SNP markers called from RADSeq data, we studied the chromosome structure of 36 ABB genotypes spanning defined taxonomic subgroups. To complement our understanding, we searched for similar events within nine AB hybrid genotypes. Recurrent homologous exchanges (HEs), i.e. chromatin exchanges between A and B subgenomes, were unravelled with at least nine founding events (HE patterns) at the origin of ABB bananas prior to clonal diversification. Two independent founding events were found for Pisang Awak genotypes. Two HE patterns, corresponding to genotypes Pelipita and Klue Teparod, show an over-representation of B genome contribution. Three HE patterns mainly found in Indian accessions shared some recombined regions and two additional patterns did not correspond to any known subgroups. The discovery of the nine founding events allowed an investigation of the possible routes that led to the creation of the different subgroups, which resulted in new hypotheses. Based on our observations, we suggest different routes that gave rise to the current diversity in the ABB cultivars, routes involving primary AB hybrids, routes leading to shared HEs and routes leading to a B excess ratio. Genetic fluxes took place between M. acuminata and M. balbisiana, particularly in India, where these unbalanced AB hybrids and ABB allotriploids originated, and where cultivated M. balbisiana are abundant. The result of this study clarifies the classification of ABB cultivars, possibly leading to the revision of the classification of this subgroup.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Bananas (Musa spp.) are a major staple food for hundreds of millions of people in developing countries. The cultivated varieties are seedless and parthenocarpic clones of which the ancestral origin remains to be clarified. The most important cultivars are triploids with an AAA, AAB or ABB genome constitution, with A and B genomes provided by M. acuminata and M. balbisiana, respectively. Previous studies suggested that inter-genome recombinations were relatively common in banana cultivars and that triploids were more likely to have passed through an intermediate hybrid. In this study, we investigated the chromosome structure within the ABB group, composed of starchy cooking bananas that play an important role in food security.
METHODS
Using SNP markers called from RADSeq data, we studied the chromosome structure of 36 ABB genotypes spanning defined taxonomic subgroups. To complement our understanding, we searched for similar events within nine AB hybrid genotypes.
KEY RESULTS
Recurrent homologous exchanges (HEs), i.e. chromatin exchanges between A and B subgenomes, were unravelled with at least nine founding events (HE patterns) at the origin of ABB bananas prior to clonal diversification. Two independent founding events were found for Pisang Awak genotypes. Two HE patterns, corresponding to genotypes Pelipita and Klue Teparod, show an over-representation of B genome contribution. Three HE patterns mainly found in Indian accessions shared some recombined regions and two additional patterns did not correspond to any known subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
The discovery of the nine founding events allowed an investigation of the possible routes that led to the creation of the different subgroups, which resulted in new hypotheses. Based on our observations, we suggest different routes that gave rise to the current diversity in the ABB cultivars, routes involving primary AB hybrids, routes leading to shared HEs and routes leading to a B excess ratio. Genetic fluxes took place between M. acuminata and M. balbisiana, particularly in India, where these unbalanced AB hybrids and ABB allotriploids originated, and where cultivated M. balbisiana are abundant. The result of this study clarifies the classification of ABB cultivars, possibly leading to the revision of the classification of this subgroup.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32104882
pii: 5760888
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa032
pmc: PMC7750727
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7-20Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Genetics. 2014 Aug;197(4):1153-63
pubmed: 24907262
Nat Genet. 2019 Mar;51(3):541-547
pubmed: 30804557
Front Physiol. 2013 Feb 07;4:9
pubmed: 23443573
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Aug;132(8):2295-2308
pubmed: 31098756
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Nov;15(11):1478-1489
pubmed: 28370938
Gigascience. 2016 Jun 06;5:25
pubmed: 27267926
Ann Bot. 2016 Dec;118(7):1269-1278
pubmed: 27590334
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 26;10:352
pubmed: 30972089
New Phytol. 2016 Jun;210(4):1453-65
pubmed: 26832306
Ann Bot. 2011 Oct;108(5):975-81
pubmed: 21835815
Ann Bot. 2012 Apr;109(5):937-51
pubmed: 22323428
Nature. 2012 Aug 9;488(7410):213-7
pubmed: 22801500
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 15;22(12):1540-2
pubmed: 16595560
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Dec;87(4):517-26
pubmed: 24190325
Database (Oxford). 2017 Jan 1;2017:
pubmed: 29220435
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54808
pubmed: 23372772
New Phytol. 2018 Jan;217(1):367-377
pubmed: 29034956
Phytochemistry. 2011 Jul;72(10):1243-50
pubmed: 21109271
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3326-8
pubmed: 23060615
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 22;6(3):e17863
pubmed: 21445344
Nat Plants. 2019 Aug;5(8):810-821
pubmed: 31308504
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 May;15(5):594-604
pubmed: 27808473
Ann Bot. 2010 Dec;106(6):849-57
pubmed: 20858591
Mol Biol Evol. 2019 Jan 1;36(1):97-111
pubmed: 30403808
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Database (Oxford). 2013 May 23;2013:bat035
pubmed: 23707967
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(1):123-34
pubmed: 19925554
Plant Biotechnol J. 2018 Jul;16(7):1265-1274
pubmed: 29205771
BMC Genomics. 2019 Mar 27;20(1):244
pubmed: 30917780
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 12;108(28):11311-8
pubmed: 21730145
BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 16;17:243
pubmed: 26984673
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2012;77(1):89-93
pubmed: 22558762
Genome. 2002 Aug;45(4):679-92
pubmed: 12175071
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Dec;118(1):43-55
pubmed: 18762903