Dedicated Cancer Centers are More Likely to Achieve a Textbook Outcome Following Hepatopancreatic Surgery.
Aged
Cancer Care Facilities
/ economics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy
/ mortality
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
/ mortality
Male
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Pancreatectomy
/ mortality
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ mortality
Postoperative Complications
/ mortality
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
United States
Journal
Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
16
12
2019
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
3
2
2021
entrez:
29
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the current study is to assess rates of textbook outcome (TO) among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatopancreatic (HP) surgery for cancer at dedicated cancer centers (DCCs) and National Cancer Institute affiliated cancer centers (NCI-CCs) versus non-DCC non-NCI hospitals. Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files were utilized to identify patients undergoing HP surgery between 2013 and 2017. TO was defined as no postoperative surgical complications, no 90-day mortality, no prolonged length of hospital stay, and no 90-day readmission after discharge. Among 21,234 Medicare patients, 8.2% patients underwent surgery at DCCs whereas 32.1% underwent surgery at NCI-CCs and 59.7% underwent an operation at neither DCCs nor NCI-CCs. Although DCCs more often cared for patients with severe comorbidities [Charlson score > 5: DCCs, 1195 (68.9%), NCI-CCs, 3687 (54.1%), others, 3970 (31.3%); p < 0.001], DCCs achieved higher rates of TO compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals. Interestingly, DCCs were more likely to perform surgery with a minimally invasive approach versus NCI-CCs and other US hospitals (17.0%, n = 295, vs. 12.6%, n = 856 vs. 11.9%, n = 1504, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing liver surgery at DCCs had 31% and 36% higher odds of achieving TO compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals, respectively. Medicare expenditure was substantially lower for patients achieving TO at DCCs compared with patients who achieved a TO at NCI-CCs. Even though DCCs more frequently took care of patients with high comorbidity burden, the likelihood of achieving TO for HP surgery at DCCs was higher compared with NCI-CCs and other US hospitals. The data suggest that DCCs provide higher-value surgical care for patients with HP malignancies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32108924
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08279-y
pii: 10.1245/s10434-020-08279-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1889-1897Références
Vanchieri C. Handful of cancer centers exempt from prospective payment system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991;83(13):907–8.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/83.13.907
Prospective Payment Systems. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ProspMedicareFeeSvcPmtGen/index . Accessed 25 Feb 2020.
National Cancer Institute. NCI-Designated cancer. https://www.cancer.gov/research/nci-role/cancer-centers . Accessed 5 Dec 2019.
ADCC Hospital-administered chemotherapy linked to better outcomes for patients. https://cancer.osu.edu/blog/adcc-hospital-administered-chemotherapy-linked-to-better-outcomes-for-patients . Accessed 5 Dec 2019.
Mehta R, Ejaz A, Hyer JM, et al. The impact of dedicated cancer centers on outcomes among medicare beneficiaries undergoing liver and pancreatic cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(12):4083–90.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07677-1
Merkow RP, Yang AD, Pavey E, et al. Comparison of hospitals affiliated with PPS-exempt cancer centers, other hospitals affiliated with NCI-designated cancer centers, and other hospitals that provide cancer care. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(8):1043–51.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0914
Bagante F, Beal EW, Merath K, et al. The impact of a malignant diagnosis on the pattern and outcome of readmission after liver and pancreatic surgery: an analysis of the nationwide readmissions database. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(8):1624–37.
doi: 10.1002/jso.25065
Gani F, Cerullo M, Amini N, et al. Frailty as a risk predictor of morbidity and mortality following liver surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(5):822–30.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3373-6
Mehta R, Merath K, Farooq A, et al. U.S. news and world report hospital ranking and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(8):1327–34.
doi: 10.1002/jso.25751
Fong Y. Textbook Outcome nomograms as multivariate clinical tools for building cancer treatment pathways and prognosticating outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):e190572.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0572
Priego P, Cuadrado M, Ballestero A, Galindo J, Lobo E. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for treatment of gastric cancer: analysis of a textbook outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(4):458–64.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0489
Merath K, Chen Q, Bagante F, et al. Textbook outcomes among medicare patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery. Ann Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003105 .
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003105
pubmed: 30499800
Salet N, Bremmer RH, Verhagen M, et al. Is textbook outcome a valuable composite measure for short-term outcomes of gastrointestinal treatments in the Netherlands using hospital information system data? A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e019405.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019405
Merath K, Chen Q, Bagante F, et al. A multi-institutional international analysis of textbook outcomes among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):e190571.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0571
Mehta R, Paredes AZ, Tsilimigras DI, et al. CMS hospital compare system of star ratings and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for cancer: do the ratings matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08088-y .
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08088-y
pubmed: 31838609
Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med Care. 1994;32(7):700–15.
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199407000-00004
Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med Care. 2000;38(8):785–95.
doi: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00003
Chen Y, Scholten A, Chomsky-Higgins K, et al. Risk factors associated with perioperative complications and prolonged length of stay after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(11):1036–41.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2648
Hussey PS, Huckfeldt P, Hirshman S, Mehrotra A. Hospital and regional variation in Medicare payment for inpatient episodes of care. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6):1056-1057.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0674
Mehta R, Sahara K, Merath K, et al. Insurance coverage type impacts hospitalization patterns among patients with hepatopancreatic malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04288-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04288-9
pubmed: 31792898
Leapfrog. Leapfrog group volume standards. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/sites/default/files/Files/LeapfrogHospitalSurvey_ProposedChanges_2019_Final.pdf . Accessed 5 Dec 2019.
Mahapatra S, Nayak S, Pati S. Quality of care in cancer: an exploration of patient perspectives. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016;5(2):338–42.
doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.192349
Hess LM, Pohl G. Perspectives of quality care in cancer treatment: a review of the literature. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013;6(6):321–9.
pubmed: 24991367
pmcid: 4031722
National Cancer Institute (NCI). https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/national-cancer-institute-nci Accessed 5 Dec 2019.
Huesch MD, Currid-Halkett E, Doctor JN. Public hospital quality report awareness: evidence from National and Californian Internet searches and social media mentions, 2012. BMJ Open. 2014;4(3):e004417.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004417
Burgers JA, Damhuis RA. 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? ERJ Open Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00030-2018
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00030-2018
pubmed: 30406123
pmcid: 6215912
Graham LA, Mull HJ, Wagner TH, et al. Comparison of a potential hospital quality metric with existing metrics for surgical quality-associated readmission. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(4):e191313.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1313
Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(9):1727–35.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1938-y
Parina RP, Chang DC, Rose JA, Talamini MA. Is a low readmission rate indicative of a good hospital? J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(2):169–76.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.020
van Roessel S, Mackay TM, van Dieren S, et al. Textbook outcome: nationwide analysis of a novel quality measure in pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg. 2019;271:155–62.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003451
Kolfschoten NE, Kievit J, Gooiker GA, et al. Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in ‘textbook outcome’. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(2):156–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.007
CMS.gov. Hospital inpatient quality reporting program. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits . Accessed 25 Feb 2020.
Aloia TA. Using center-specific medicare data to compare cancer care outcomes: are we seeing the whole playing field or just a blade of grass. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:3809–10. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07720-1 .
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07720-1
pubmed: 31420801
Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, et al. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):664–72.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001437
Beal EW, Mehta R, Merath K, et al. Outcomes after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: intersection of travel distance and hospital volume. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(7):1425–34.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04233-w
Merath K, Mehta R, Tsilimigras DI, et al. In-hospital mortality following pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04307-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04307-9
pubmed: 31792898
Idrees JJ, Merath K, Gani F, et al. Trends in centralization of surgical care and compliance with National Cancer Center Network guidelines for resected cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(8):981–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.11.013
Howlader N NA, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review (CSR) 1975-2016. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/ . Accessed 5 Dec 2019.