A prospective analysis of health-related quality of life in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients managed with intensity modulated radiation therapy, with vs. without hormonal therapy.
Aged
Androgen Antagonists
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
/ adverse effects
Chemoradiotherapy
/ adverse effects
Defecation
/ drug effects
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Linear Models
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Prospective Studies
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Quality of Life
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ adverse effects
Risk Assessment
/ statistics & numerical data
Risk Factors
Self Report
/ statistics & numerical data
Sexual Behavior
/ drug effects
Treatment Outcome
Urination
/ drug effects
HRQoL
Hormone therapy
Prostate cancer
Radiation
Journal
Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
04
11
2019
revised:
21
01
2020
accepted:
05
02
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
7
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Combined radiotherapy and hormonal treatment are recommended for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (CaP). This study compared the long-term effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of intermediate- and high-risk CaP patients managed with radiation therapy (RT) with vs. without hormone therapy (HT). Patients with intermediate- and high-risk CaP enrolled in the Center for Prostate Disease Research diagnosed from 2007 to 2017 were included. EPIC and SF-36 questionnaires were completed and HRQoL scores were compared for patients receiving RT vs. RT + HT at baseline (pretreatment), 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after CaP diagnosis. Longitudinal patterns of change in HRQoL were modeled using linear regression models, adjusting for baseline HRQoL, age at CaP diagnosis, race, comorbidities, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratum, time to treatment, and follow-up time. Of 164 patients, 93 (56.7%) received RT alone and 71 (43.3%) received RT + HT. Both groups reported comparable baseline HRQoL. Patients receiving RT+HT were more likely to be NCCN high risk as compared to those receiving only RT. The RT + HT patients experienced worse sexual function, hormonal function, and hormonal bother than those who only received RT; however, HRQoL recovered over time for the RT + HT group. No significant differences were observed between groups in urinary and bowel domains or SF-36 mental and physical scores. Combined RT + HT treatment was associated with temporary lower scores in sexual and hormonal HRQoL compared with RT only. Intermediate- and high-risk CaP patients should be counseled about the possible declines in HRQoL associated with HT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32139288
pii: S1078-1439(20)30048-X
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.007
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
794.e1-794.e9Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.