Potential best practices for assessment of interprofessional team-ready behaviors on APPEs.
Advanced pharmacy practice experiences
Feedback
Interprofessional collaboration
Observable behaviors
Journal
Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning
ISSN: 1877-1300
Titre abrégé: Curr Pharm Teach Learn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101560815
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
25
04
2019
revised:
16
08
2019
accepted:
09
11
2019
entrez:
10
3
2020
pubmed:
10
3
2020
medline:
5
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine potential best practices for assessment of team-ready behaviors of pharmacy students participating in interprofessional advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Preceptors received training on two interprofessional behavioral assessment tools, the modified interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric (mICAR) and individual teamwork observation and feedback tool (iTOFT). Preceptors evaluated students at midpoint and end of APPE using each tool. Preceptors completed a utility survey on each tool to determine a preference. Focus groups were conducted with a subset of preceptors to elicit further perspectives. Experts in interprofessional education (IPE) and accrediting board members were interviewed to determine a national perspective of best practices. Nineteen preceptors participated in the study. Of these, 12 completed all components of the study. No significant difference was found comparing utility of mICAR to iTOFT, although mICAR trended toward being easier to use/understand (p = 0.29). Focus group participants (n = 8) felt using a tool led to enhanced feedback and interprofessional experiences and all preferred mICAR. IPE experts and accrediting board members perceived best practices to include using a tool that aligns with IPE collaborative competencies, embedding the tool into existing APPE evaluation processes, and that is applicable to all health professional learners/evaluators. Preceptors preferred mICAR to iTOFT, though no significant difference was observed. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and for best practices to emerge. Future steps include evaluating interprofessional teamwork using a tool in a 360-evaluation of the individual learner by preceptors outside of the learner's own profession.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32147157
pii: S1877-1297(19)30206-0
doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.11.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
156-162Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest None.