Timing of electronic reminders did not improve trial participant questionnaire response: a randomized trial and meta-analyses.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bursitis
/ therapy
Cell Phone
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Male
Microcomputers
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reminder Systems
/ statistics & numerical data
Research Design
/ statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ statistics & numerical data
Text Messaging
/ statistics & numerical data
Time Factors
Meta-analyses
Randomized controlled trial
Retention
SMS
Study Within A Trial
Text message
Journal
Journal of clinical epidemiology
ISSN: 1878-5921
Titre abrégé: J Clin Epidemiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8801383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
16
10
2019
revised:
18
02
2020
accepted:
03
03
2020
pubmed:
11
3
2020
medline:
2
2
2021
entrez:
11
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to assess whether timing of short messaging service (SMS) reminders improved postal questionnaire return rates from participants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). A Study Within A Trial (SWAT) embedded in a multicenter RCT evaluating three treatments for the frozen shoulder. Participants who provided a mobile telephone number were randomized to either prenotification SMS on the day of the questionnaire mail-out or postnotification SMS 4 days after questionnaire mail-out for the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who returned a valid questionnaire. A systematic review was undertaken to identify other embedded trials to perform a meta-analysis. Of the 269 participants, 122/135 (90.4%) returned a valid questionnaire in the prenotification arm and 119/134 (88.8%) in the postnotification arm (difference of -1.6%; 95% CI of difference: -8.9%, 5.7%). There was no difference in time to response (HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.34) or need for additional reminders (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.17). Meta-analysis of two RCTs showed no difference in response rates between prenotification and postnotification reminders (OR = 0.78 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.45). Timing of SMS reminders did not improve response rates and time to response or affect the need for additional reminders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32151697
pii: S0895-4356(19)30953-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
70-77Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R013748/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.