Treatment strategies to prevent and reduce gynecomastia and/or breast pain caused by antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer : Statement from the DEGRO working group prostate cancer.
Adenocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Anastrozole
/ therapeutic use
Androgen Antagonists
/ adverse effects
Androgens
Anilides
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
/ adverse effects
Dizziness
/ chemically induced
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Drug Administration Schedule
Estrogen Receptor Modulators
/ administration & dosage
Flushing
/ chemically induced
Gynecomastia
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Mastodynia
/ chemically induced
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent
/ drug therapy
Nitriles
/ adverse effects
Off-Label Use
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Tamoxifen
/ administration & dosage
Tosyl Compounds
/ adverse effects
Antiandrogen therapy
Breast pain
Gynecomastia
Prostate cancer
Treatment
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
05
02
2020
accepted:
18
02
2020
pubmed:
14
3
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
14
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To provide an overview on the available treatments to prevent and reduce gynecomastia and/or breast pain caused by antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer. The German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) expert panel summarized available evidence published and assessed the validity of the information on efficacy and treatment-related toxicity. Eight randomized controlled trials and one meta-analysis were identified. Two randomized trials demonstrated that prophylactic radiation therapy (RT) using 1 × 10 Gy or 2 × 6 Gy significantly reduced the rate of gynecomastia but not breast pain, as compared to observation. A randomized dose-finding trial identified the daily dose of 20 mg tamoxifen (TMX) as the most effective prophylactic dose and another randomized trial described that daily TMX use was superior to weekly use. Another randomized trial showed that prophylactic daily TMX is more effective than TMX given at the onset of gynecomastia. Two other randomized trials described that TMX was clearly superior to anastrozole in reducing the risk for gynecomastia and/or breast pain. One comparative randomized trial between prophylactic RT using 1 × 12 Gy and TMX concluded that prophylactic TMX is more effective compared to prophylactic RT and furthermore that TMX appears to be more effective to treat gynecomastia and/or breast pain when symptoms are already present. A meta-analysis confirmed that both prophylactic RT and TMX can reduce the risk of gynecomastia and/or breast pain with TMX being more effective; however, the rate of side effects after TMX including dizziness and hot flushes might be higher than after RT and must be taken into account. Less is known regarding the comparative effectiveness of different radiation fractionation schedules and more modern RT techniques. Prophylactic RT as well as daily TMX can significantly reduce the incidence of gynecomastia and/or breast pain. TMX appears to be an effective alternative to RT also as a therapeutic treatment in the presence of gynecomastia but its side effects and off-label use must be considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32166452
doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01598-9
pii: 10.1007/s00066-020-01598-9
pmc: PMC7305090
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Androgens
0
Anilides
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
0
Estrogen Receptor Modulators
0
Nitriles
0
Tosyl Compounds
0
Tamoxifen
094ZI81Y45
Anastrozole
2Z07MYW1AZ
bicalutamide
A0Z3NAU9DP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
589-597Références
Lancet Oncol. 2005 May;6(5):295-300
pubmed: 15863377
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 1;23(4):808-15
pubmed: 15681525
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0136094
pubmed: 26308532
J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):519-24
pubmed: 20620411
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1969;3(3):183-7
pubmed: 5375746
Am J Med. 1963 Jan;34:103-12
pubmed: 14000906
Radiat Oncol. 2008 Jan 10;3:2
pubmed: 18186924
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Jul;194(7):619-626
pubmed: 29383406
Br J Radiol. 2000 Feb;73(866):121-2
pubmed: 10884722
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Dec;6(12):972-9
pubmed: 16321765
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 May 1;101(1):211-216
pubmed: 29534900
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):787-94
pubmed: 25687533
Br J Cancer. 2019 Feb;120(3):301-305
pubmed: 30655614
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012 Sep;10(3):174-9
pubmed: 22502790
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005;8(1):75-83
pubmed: 15685254
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):238-45
pubmed: 19481335
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Oct 1;60(2):476-83
pubmed: 15380582
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Feb;196(2):109-116
pubmed: 31784804
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 15;83(4):e519-24
pubmed: 22704706
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 26;3(3):240-244
pubmed: 30197936
Strahlenther Onkol. 2011 Dec;187(12):771-7
pubmed: 22127363
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):825-36
pubmed: 25097095
J Urol. 2005 Nov;174(5):1737-42
pubmed: 16217274
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):106-14
pubmed: 17270340
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2197-203
pubmed: 16280763