Communicative challenges among physicians, patients, and family caregivers in cancer care: An exploratory qualitative study in Ethiopia.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
09
2019
accepted:
26
02
2020
entrez:
14
3
2020
pubmed:
14
3
2020
medline:
27
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cancer is a growing concern in Ethiopia. Though communication is essential for the treatment process, few studies have looked at communication in Ethiopian cancer care. Due to the large number of patients and scarcity of resources, it is vital to understand how to manage consultations in order to effectively help as many patients as possible in this challenging work environment. Thus, research is needed to analyze and understand the communicative challenges experienced by physicians, patients, and family caregivers, in order to successfully handle patient care in practice. We explore communication in Ethiopian cancer care and present the main challenges faced by physicians, patients, and family caregivers. This explorative qualitative study was conducted at the Oncology Department of the Tikur Anbessa (Black Lion) Specialized Teaching Hospital (TASH) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A triangulation of data collection methods was used: 91 audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews and 21 video-recordings of authentic interactions during hospital rounds. The aim was to obtain as complete a picture as possible of communication from the perspectives of physicians, patients, and family caregivers. The interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis and the identified themes were supported by excerpts from the transcribed recordings. Eight themes emerged from the data. Workload and time pressure, in combination with restricted space for privacy, limited the possibilities for physicians to deliver detailed information and provide emotional support. Furthermore, patient literacy levels, in combination with no or little cancer awareness, financial problems, reliance on traditional and religious treatments, the stigma of cancer, and a fatalistic attitude, resulted in delays in patients seeking care and participating in positive health behaviors, and, subsequently, often resulted in an unwillingness to openly discuss problems with physicians and adhere to treatment. The study also illustrates the paramount role of family in physician-patient communication in Ethiopia. Though family caregivers provide a valuable interpreting support when patients have limited language skills, they can also prevent patients from sharing information with physicians. Another important finding is that family caregivers were often responsible for making decisions about treatment and avoided telling patients about a poor prognosis, believing that conveying bad news may upset them. All of these themes have important implications for the role of ethically acceptable communication in patient-centered care. This study has identified a number of serious challenges for successful and ethically acceptable health communication in Ethiopian cancer care. The study contributes to our understanding of the complexity around the role of family, combined with patients' dependency on family members for communication, support, and access to care, which creates particular ethical dilemmas for the medical staff. The questions raised by this study concern how to organize consultations to achieve patient-centered health communication, while maintaining a constructive alliance with the family and not jeopardizing the patient's continued access to care. The integration of communication training for medical students in Ethiopia, with a focus on ethical guidelines for family-centered patient consultation suitable for these circumstances, would be an essential step.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Cancer is a growing concern in Ethiopia. Though communication is essential for the treatment process, few studies have looked at communication in Ethiopian cancer care. Due to the large number of patients and scarcity of resources, it is vital to understand how to manage consultations in order to effectively help as many patients as possible in this challenging work environment. Thus, research is needed to analyze and understand the communicative challenges experienced by physicians, patients, and family caregivers, in order to successfully handle patient care in practice.
OBJECTIVE
We explore communication in Ethiopian cancer care and present the main challenges faced by physicians, patients, and family caregivers.
METHODS
This explorative qualitative study was conducted at the Oncology Department of the Tikur Anbessa (Black Lion) Specialized Teaching Hospital (TASH) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A triangulation of data collection methods was used: 91 audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews and 21 video-recordings of authentic interactions during hospital rounds. The aim was to obtain as complete a picture as possible of communication from the perspectives of physicians, patients, and family caregivers. The interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis and the identified themes were supported by excerpts from the transcribed recordings.
RESULTS
Eight themes emerged from the data. Workload and time pressure, in combination with restricted space for privacy, limited the possibilities for physicians to deliver detailed information and provide emotional support. Furthermore, patient literacy levels, in combination with no or little cancer awareness, financial problems, reliance on traditional and religious treatments, the stigma of cancer, and a fatalistic attitude, resulted in delays in patients seeking care and participating in positive health behaviors, and, subsequently, often resulted in an unwillingness to openly discuss problems with physicians and adhere to treatment. The study also illustrates the paramount role of family in physician-patient communication in Ethiopia. Though family caregivers provide a valuable interpreting support when patients have limited language skills, they can also prevent patients from sharing information with physicians. Another important finding is that family caregivers were often responsible for making decisions about treatment and avoided telling patients about a poor prognosis, believing that conveying bad news may upset them. All of these themes have important implications for the role of ethically acceptable communication in patient-centered care.
CONCLUSIONS
This study has identified a number of serious challenges for successful and ethically acceptable health communication in Ethiopian cancer care. The study contributes to our understanding of the complexity around the role of family, combined with patients' dependency on family members for communication, support, and access to care, which creates particular ethical dilemmas for the medical staff. The questions raised by this study concern how to organize consultations to achieve patient-centered health communication, while maintaining a constructive alliance with the family and not jeopardizing the patient's continued access to care. The integration of communication training for medical students in Ethiopia, with a focus on ethical guidelines for family-centered patient consultation suitable for these circumstances, would be an essential step.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32168353
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230309
pii: PONE-D-19-26533
pmc: PMC7069641
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0230309Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2019 May 10;14(5):e0216522
pubmed: 31075122
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;8(2):020301
pubmed: 30774938
Curr Opin Oncol. 2005 Jul;17(4):351-4
pubmed: 15933466
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7
pubmed: 25158659
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 16;18(1):298
pubmed: 29548313
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):525-526
pubmed: 28170466
Int J Womens Health. 2017 Apr 19;9:213-221
pubmed: 28458582
West J Med. 1992 Sep;157(3):328-32
pubmed: 1413779
Health Care Anal. 2012 Sep;20(3):231-49
pubmed: 21786152
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):1072
pubmed: 30157813
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;5(4):420-6
pubmed: 24644164
Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8
pubmed: 11513933
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:60-68
pubmed: 30055374
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 Mar;28(2):111-116
pubmed: 29983508
BMC Cancer. 2013 Feb 08;13:69
pubmed: 23391288
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):4
pubmed: 30616640
J Clin Ethics. 2008 Fall;19(3):223-33
pubmed: 19004432
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 12;14(11):e0215117
pubmed: 31714915
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):23
pubmed: 29866163
J Palliat Med. 2018 May;21(5):622-630
pubmed: 29425055
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0161014
pubmed: 27626804
Indian J Palliat Care. 2015 Jan-Apr;21(1):35-8
pubmed: 25709183
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220769
pubmed: 31369640
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 3;291(6491):315-7
pubmed: 3926177
Fam Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;33(7):528-32
pubmed: 11456245
J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):531-5
pubmed: 16131555
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Feb 14;14(1):15
pubmed: 29444684
J Cancer Prev. 2019 Sep;24(3):163-172
pubmed: 31624722
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Dec 29;11:83
pubmed: 23273140
J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar;24(1):33-42
pubmed: 30993093
Glob Public Health. 2011;6(7):719-31
pubmed: 20865612
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):193-201
pubmed: 26278636
Harefuah. 2002 Apr;141(4):349-52, 410, 409
pubmed: 12017888