DMSO supplementation during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes improves blastocyst rate and quality.


Journal

Theriogenology
ISSN: 1879-3231
Titre abrégé: Theriogenology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0421510

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2020
Historique:
received: 01 11 2019
revised: 28 02 2020
accepted: 29 02 2020
pubmed: 17 3 2020
medline: 5 2 2021
entrez: 16 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The molecule Dimethyl sulfoxide is widely used as drug solvent. However, its antioxidant property was poorly explored. In this study, we evaluated the effect of DMSO supplementation during oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM) on embryo development and quality. Bovine oocytes were matured with different DMSO concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1 and 10% v:v) followed by in vitro fertilization. Subsequently, quality indicators such as gene expression of SOX2, OCT4, CDX2, SOD1, oocyte and embryo redox status and DNA damage were evaluated. Polar body extrusion and blastocyst rates increased with 0.5% v:v DMSO. Moreover, first polar body extrusion and blastocyst rates did not increase with 1%, and 10% of DMSO reduced polar body extrusion and did not produce blastocyst. Optimal concentration of DMSO for the use on the maturation was estimated at around 0.45% v:v. Supplementation with 0.5% v:v DMSO has not affected mRNA abundance of genes key in blastocyst, however 0.75% increased gene expression of OCT4 and SOX2. Oocytes matured with 0.5% v:v DMSO and blastocyst from DMSO group showed reduced lipid peroxidation respect control. Total Glutathione concentrations increased in blastocyst stage in DMSO group. DMSO increased the total cell number of blastocysts but not TUNEL positive cells. In conclusion, our results suggest that low DMSO concentrations used during bovine oocytes in vitro maturation increases the maturation, as well as the blastocyst rate and its quality, without demonstrating deleterious effect on embryo cells.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32171973
pii: S0093-691X(20)30157-6
doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.02.045
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

CDX2 Transcription Factor 0
Culture Media 0
Octamer Transcription Factors 0
SOXB1 Transcription Factors 0
Superoxide Dismutase EC 1.15.1.1
Superoxide Dismutase-1 EC 1.15.1.1
Glutathione GAN16C9B8O
Dimethyl Sulfoxide YOW8V9698H

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

140-148

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Amada Eugenia Ynsaurralde-Rivolta (AE)

Animal Biotechnology Laboratory, Facultad de Agronomía, INPA-CONICET, Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Mercedes, Corrientes, Argentina. Electronic address: eugeniaynsaurralde@gmail.com.

Mariana Suvá (M)

Animal Biotechnology Laboratory, Facultad de Agronomía, INPA-CONICET, Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: marianasuva@gmail.com.

Carolina Griselda Luchetti (CG)

Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Instituto de Investigación y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal (INITRA), Cátedra de Histología y Embriología, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. Electronic address: caroluchetti@gmail.com.

Romina Jimena Bevacqua (RJ)

Animal Biotechnology Laboratory, Facultad de Agronomía, INPA-CONICET, Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: bevacqua@agro.uba.ar.

Sebastian Munilla (S)

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: munilla@agro.uba.ar.

Lleretny Rodriguez-Alvarez (L)

Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Chillán, Chile. Electronic address: llrodriguez@udec.cl.

Alejandra Velasquez (A)

Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Chillán, Chile. Electronic address: alevelasquez@udec.cl.

Olinda Briski (O)

Animal Biotechnology Laboratory, Facultad de Agronomía, INPA-CONICET, Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: briskiolinda@agro.uba.ar.

Daniel Lombardo (D)

Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Instituto de Investigación y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal (INITRA), Cátedra de Histología y Embriología, Argentina. Electronic address: dlombard@fvet.uba.ar.

Daniel Salamone (D)

Animal Biotechnology Laboratory, Facultad de Agronomía, INPA-CONICET, Buenos Aires University, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: salamone@agro.uba.ar.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH