Molecular classification and therapeutic targets in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Aged
B7-H1 Antigen
/ genetics
Bile Duct Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Cholangiocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Cohort Studies
Drug Discovery
Europe
/ epidemiology
Female
Genome-Wide Association Study
/ methods
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4
/ genetics
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Male
Molecular Targeted Therapy
/ methods
Prognosis
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ genetics
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
/ methods
Signal Transduction
/ genetics
United States
/ epidemiology
Biomarkers
Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Immunotherapy
Liver cancer
Molecular classification
Targeted therapies
Journal
Journal of hepatology
ISSN: 1600-0641
Titre abrégé: J Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8503886
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
30
09
2019
revised:
04
03
2020
accepted:
04
03
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
4
11
2021
entrez:
17
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a deadly malignancy of the bile ducts, can be classified based on its anatomical location into either intrahepatic (iCCA) or extrahepatic (eCCA), each with different pathogenesis and clinical management. There is limited understanding of the molecular landscape of eCCA and no targeted therapy with clinical efficacy has been approved. We aimed to provide a molecular classification of eCCA and identify potential targets for molecular therapies. An integrative genomic analysis of an international multicenter cohort of 189 eCCA cases was conducted. Genomic analysis included whole-genome expression, targeted DNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Molecular findings were validated in an external set of 181 biliary tract tumors from the ICGC. KRAS (36.7%), TP53 (34.7%), ARID1A (14%) and SMAD4 (10.7%) were the most prevalent mutations, with ∼25% of tumors having a putative actionable genomic alteration according to OncoKB. Transcriptome-based unsupervised clustering helped us define 4 molecular classes of eCCA. Tumors classified within the Metabolic class (19%) showed a hepatocyte-like phenotype with activation of the transcription factor HNF4A and enrichment in gene signatures related to bile acid metabolism. The Proliferation class (23%), more common in patients with distal CCA, was characterized by enrichment of MYC targets, ERBB2 mutations/amplifications and activation of mTOR signaling. The Mesenchymal class (47%) was defined by signatures of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, aberrant TGFβ signaling and poor overall survival. Finally, tumors in the Immune class (11%) had a higher lymphocyte infiltration, overexpression of PD-1/PD-L1 and molecular features associated with a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. An integrative molecular characterization identified distinct subclasses of eCCA. Genomic traits of each class provide the rationale for exploring patient stratification and novel therapeutic approaches. Targeted therapies have not been approved for the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We performed a multi-platform molecular characterization of this tumor in a cohort of 189 patients. These analyses revealed 4 novel transcriptome-based molecular classes of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and identified ∼25% of tumors with actionable genomic alterations, which has potential prognostic and therapeutic implications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a deadly malignancy of the bile ducts, can be classified based on its anatomical location into either intrahepatic (iCCA) or extrahepatic (eCCA), each with different pathogenesis and clinical management. There is limited understanding of the molecular landscape of eCCA and no targeted therapy with clinical efficacy has been approved. We aimed to provide a molecular classification of eCCA and identify potential targets for molecular therapies.
METHODS
An integrative genomic analysis of an international multicenter cohort of 189 eCCA cases was conducted. Genomic analysis included whole-genome expression, targeted DNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Molecular findings were validated in an external set of 181 biliary tract tumors from the ICGC.
RESULTS
KRAS (36.7%), TP53 (34.7%), ARID1A (14%) and SMAD4 (10.7%) were the most prevalent mutations, with ∼25% of tumors having a putative actionable genomic alteration according to OncoKB. Transcriptome-based unsupervised clustering helped us define 4 molecular classes of eCCA. Tumors classified within the Metabolic class (19%) showed a hepatocyte-like phenotype with activation of the transcription factor HNF4A and enrichment in gene signatures related to bile acid metabolism. The Proliferation class (23%), more common in patients with distal CCA, was characterized by enrichment of MYC targets, ERBB2 mutations/amplifications and activation of mTOR signaling. The Mesenchymal class (47%) was defined by signatures of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, aberrant TGFβ signaling and poor overall survival. Finally, tumors in the Immune class (11%) had a higher lymphocyte infiltration, overexpression of PD-1/PD-L1 and molecular features associated with a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
CONCLUSION
An integrative molecular characterization identified distinct subclasses of eCCA. Genomic traits of each class provide the rationale for exploring patient stratification and novel therapeutic approaches.
LAY SUMMARY
Targeted therapies have not been approved for the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We performed a multi-platform molecular characterization of this tumor in a cohort of 189 patients. These analyses revealed 4 novel transcriptome-based molecular classes of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and identified ∼25% of tumors with actionable genomic alterations, which has potential prognostic and therapeutic implications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32173382
pii: S0168-8278(20)30166-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.008
pmc: PMC8418904
mid: NIHMS1716172
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
B7-H1 Antigen
0
CD274 protein, human
0
HNF4A protein, human
0
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
315-327Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 26813
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA015083
Pays : United States
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C9380/A26813
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA210964
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA196521
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest J.M.L. is receiving research support from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Eisai Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Ipsen, and consulting fees from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Eisai Inc, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celsion Corporation, Eli Lilly, Roche, Genentech, Glycotest, Nucleix, Can-Fite Biopharma, AstraZeneca, and Exelixis. A.V. reports personal fees from NGM Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Nucleix, Fuji Wako, Guidepoint and Exact Sciences. L.R.R. is receiving research support from Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, BTG International, Exact Sciences, Gilead Sciences, GRAIL Inc., RedHill Biopharma Ltd., TARGET PharmaSolutions and Wako Diagnostics, and is advisory board member of Bayer, Exact Sciences, Gilead Sciences, GRAIL, Inc., QED Therapeutics, Inc. and TAVEC. B.M. reports personal fees from Bayer and Gilead. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.
Références
Nat Genet. 2015 Sep;47(9):1003-10
pubmed: 26258846
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 20;36(3):276-282
pubmed: 29182496
J Hepatol. 2017 Oct;67(4):727-738
pubmed: 28532995
Cancer Cell. 2017 Jul 10;32(1):57-70.e3
pubmed: 28648284
J Hepatol. 2018 May;68(5):959-969
pubmed: 29360550
Nat Rev Immunol. 2010 Apr;10(4):248-56
pubmed: 20336152
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15;22(2):291-300
pubmed: 26405193
Gastroenterology. 2017 Mar;152(4):745-761
pubmed: 28043904
Gastroenterology. 2012 Apr;142(4):1021-1031.e15
pubmed: 22178589
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;13(5):261-80
pubmed: 27095655
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;16(4):207-220
pubmed: 30718832
Cell. 2015 Jan 15;160(1-2):299-312
pubmed: 25533785
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Nov;31(11):1023-31
pubmed: 24142049
Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 15;70(24):10288-98
pubmed: 21159648
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;11(1):55-67
pubmed: 23982684
J Clin Invest. 2017 Aug 1;127(8):2930-2940
pubmed: 28650338
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;14(6):333-342
pubmed: 28400627
Nat Med. 2015 Nov;21(11):1350-6
pubmed: 26457759
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
pubmed: 16632515
Nat Med. 2019 May;25(5):850-860
pubmed: 31068703
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov 29;9(1):44-54
pubmed: 22143274
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(2):153-161
pubmed: 28949957
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:
pubmed: 28890946
Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;68(16):6779-88
pubmed: 18701503
Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 1;73(7):2259-70
pubmed: 23370327
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1553-1568
pubmed: 29860482
Cell. 2017 Jun 15;169(7):1327-1341.e23
pubmed: 28622513
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):663-673
pubmed: 30922733
Gastroenterology. 2013 Apr;144(4):829-40
pubmed: 23295441
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;15(2):95-111
pubmed: 28994423
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Mar 15;24(6):1287-1295
pubmed: 29298798
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Dec;87:122-130
pubmed: 29145038
Nat Commun. 2017 Jul 12;8:16022
pubmed: 28699633
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Nov;15(11):683-91
pubmed: 26449179
Cell. 2017 Nov 30;171(6):1437-1452.e17
pubmed: 29195078
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):3126-32
pubmed: 15284264
Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 15;69(18):7385-92
pubmed: 19723656
Cancer Discov. 2017 Sep;7(9):943-962
pubmed: 28818953
Bioinformatics. 2009 Feb 1;25(3):415-6
pubmed: 19106121
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 22;6:6087
pubmed: 25608663
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1168-78
pubmed: 26343385
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):726-36
pubmed: 26287849
Hepatology. 2003 Jun;37(6):1249-53
pubmed: 12774000
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Mar 15;24(6):1344-1354
pubmed: 29288237
Cancer Discov. 2017 Oct;7(10):1116-1135
pubmed: 28667006
Hepatology. 2015 Jun;61(6):1945-56
pubmed: 25645722
Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):812-826
pubmed: 28624577
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;23(16):4642-4650
pubmed: 28420720
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Feb 09;12(3):181-95
pubmed: 22318237
Nat Med. 2011 Apr;17(4):500-3
pubmed: 21460848
Nat Genet. 2014 Aug;46(8):872-6
pubmed: 24997986
Gastroenterology. 2013 Dec;145(6):1215-29
pubmed: 24140396
Cancer Cell. 2017 Aug 14;32(2):185-203.e13
pubmed: 28810144
Cell Rep. 2017 Mar 14;18(11):2780-2794
pubmed: 28297679
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug 02;8(9):512-22
pubmed: 21808282
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3531-40
pubmed: 20547994
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):189-194
pubmed: 29420467
Gastroenterology. 2011 May;140(5):1501-12.e2
pubmed: 21320499
Hepatology. 2013 Dec;58(6):1992-2000
pubmed: 23775819
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612
pubmed: 24113773
Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 1;77(13):3540-3550
pubmed: 28487385
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81
pubmed: 20375404
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 May;9(5):361-71
pubmed: 19343034
J Clin Pathol. 2016 May;69(5):403-8
pubmed: 26500333