Adventitious bursitis in the plantar fat pad of forefoot presenting as a tumoral mass.
Adipose Tissue
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Adventitia
/ diagnostic imaging
Bursitis
/ diagnostic imaging
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Forefoot, Human
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Radiography
Remission, Spontaneous
Soft Tissue Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Adventitious bursitis
MRI
forefoot
plantar fat pad
pseudotumoral mass
soft tissue mass
soft tissue tumor
Journal
Journal of radiology case reports
ISSN: 1943-0922
Titre abrégé: J Radiol Case Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101494925
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez:
19
3
2020
pubmed:
19
3
2020
medline:
8
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adventitious bursitis of the plantar fat pad is a common cause of forefoot pain. It may develop at sites where subcutaneous tissue is exposed to friction and high pressure. In the forefoot, adventitious bursitis is usually adjacent to bony prominences of the metatarsal heads. Diagnosis and management of adventitious bursitis usually do not require imaging studies. However, the condition occasionally presents as a solid pseudotumoral mass requiring imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may demonstrate a heterogeneous mass with a solid component exhibiting intermediate to high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and thick nodular enhancement suggesting a neoplastic lesion. We report three cases of adventitious bursitis in patients who complained of a painful palpable mass on the forefoot, with a partially solid and enhancing component seen on MRI. In the first case, a biopsy was performed for the diagnosis of adventitious bursitis. The two other cases exhibited a solid component on MRI. However, a diagnosis of adventitious bursitis was suspected, and it was felt that a biopsy could be postponed. The spontaneous regression of the mass with relative discharge of the forefoot pressure confirmed the diagnosis. With these three cases, we illustrate the MR findings that could suggest adventitious bursitis despite the presence of a solid component and that may obviate the need for pathologic proof.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32184933
doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v14i2.3711
pii: jrcr-14-2-12
pmc: PMC7060018
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12-20Informations de copyright
Copyright Journal of Radiology Case Reports.
Références
Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):841-5
pubmed: 7972835
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2005 Sep;9(3):175-86
pubmed: 16247719
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):863-70
pubmed: 18195378
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017 Feb;25(1):159-181
pubmed: 27888846
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jan;164(1):129-34
pubmed: 7998525
Radiographics. 2000 Oct;20 Spec No:S153-79
pubmed: 11046169
Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):493-502
pubmed: 15459325
Radiographics. 2001 Nov-Dec;21(6):1425-40
pubmed: 11706214
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec;199(6):1345-57
pubmed: 23169729
Insights Imaging. 2011 Aug;2(4):439-452
pubmed: 22347966
Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Apr;29(4):187-95
pubmed: 10855466