Cross-species cortical alignment identifies different types of anatomical reorganization in the primate temporal lobe.
Chimpanzee
connectivity
cortical myelin
cross-species registration
human
neuroscience
rhesus macaque
temporal lobe
tractography
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 03 2020
23 03 2020
Historique:
received:
31
10
2019
accepted:
19
03
2020
pubmed:
24
3
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
24
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evolutionary adaptations of temporo-parietal cortex are considered to be a critical specialization of the human brain. Cortical adaptations, however, can affect different aspects of brain architecture, including local expansion of the cortical sheet or changes in connectivity between cortical areas. We distinguish different types of changes in brain architecture using a computational neuroanatomy approach. We investigate the extent to which between-species alignment, based on cortical myelin, can predict changes in connectivity patterns across macaque, chimpanzee, and human. We show that expansion and relocation of brain areas can predict terminations of several white matter tracts in temporo-parietal cortex, including the middle and superior longitudinal fasciculus, but not the arcuate fasciculus. This demonstrates that the arcuate fasciculus underwent additional evolutionary modifications affecting the temporal lobe connectivity pattern. This approach can flexibly be extended to include other features of cortical organization and other species, allowing direct tests of comparative hypotheses of brain organization. How did language evolve? Since the human lineage diverged from that of the other great apes millions of years ago, changes in the brain have given rise to behaviors that are unique to humans, such as language. Some of these changes involved alterations in the size and relative positions of brain areas, while others required changes in the connections between those regions. But did these changes occur independently, or can the changes observed in one actually explain the changes we see in the other? One way to answer this question is to use neuroimaging to compare the brains of related species, using different techniques to examine different aspects of brain structure. Imaging a fatty substance called myelin, for example, can produce maps showing the size and position of brain areas. Measuring how easily water molecules diffuse through brain tissue, by contrast, provides information about connections between areas. Eichert et al. performed both types of imaging in macaques and healthy human volunteers, and compared the results to existing data from chimpanzees. Computer simulations were used to manipulate the myelin-based images so that equivalent brain areas in each species occupied the same positions. In most cases, the distortions – or 'warping' – needed to superimpose brain regions on top of one another also predicted the differences between species in the connections between those regions. This suggests that movement of brain regions over the course of evolution explain the differences previously observed in brain connectivity. But there was one notable exception, namely a bundle of fibers with a key role in language called the arcuate fasciculus. This structure follows a slightly different route through the brain in humans compared to chimpanzees and macaques. Eichert et al. show that this difference cannot be explained solely by changes in the positions of brain regions. Instead, the arcuate fasciculus underwent additional changes in its course, which may have contributed to the evolution of language. The framework developed by Eichert et al. can be used to study evolution in many different species. Interspecies comparisons can provide clues to how brain structure and activity relate to each other and to behavior, and this knowledge could ultimately help to understand and treat brain disorders.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
How did language evolve? Since the human lineage diverged from that of the other great apes millions of years ago, changes in the brain have given rise to behaviors that are unique to humans, such as language. Some of these changes involved alterations in the size and relative positions of brain areas, while others required changes in the connections between those regions. But did these changes occur independently, or can the changes observed in one actually explain the changes we see in the other? One way to answer this question is to use neuroimaging to compare the brains of related species, using different techniques to examine different aspects of brain structure. Imaging a fatty substance called myelin, for example, can produce maps showing the size and position of brain areas. Measuring how easily water molecules diffuse through brain tissue, by contrast, provides information about connections between areas. Eichert et al. performed both types of imaging in macaques and healthy human volunteers, and compared the results to existing data from chimpanzees. Computer simulations were used to manipulate the myelin-based images so that equivalent brain areas in each species occupied the same positions. In most cases, the distortions – or 'warping' – needed to superimpose brain regions on top of one another also predicted the differences between species in the connections between those regions. This suggests that movement of brain regions over the course of evolution explain the differences previously observed in brain connectivity. But there was one notable exception, namely a bundle of fibers with a key role in language called the arcuate fasciculus. This structure follows a slightly different route through the brain in humans compared to chimpanzees and macaques. Eichert et al. show that this difference cannot be explained solely by changes in the positions of brain regions. Instead, the arcuate fasciculus underwent additional changes in its course, which may have contributed to the evolution of language. The framework developed by Eichert et al. can be used to study evolution in many different species. Interspecies comparisons can provide clues to how brain structure and activity relate to each other and to behavior, and this knowledge could ultimately help to understand and treat brain disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32202497
doi: 10.7554/eLife.53232
pii: 53232
pmc: PMC7180052
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/H016902/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P51 OD011132
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome
ID : 203730/Z/16/Z
Organisme : Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship
ID : 750026
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH118534
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome
ID : 203139/Z/16/Z
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/N019814/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Dutch National Science Foundation
ID : 452-13-015
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L009013/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome
ID : SBF003\1116
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : P50 MH100029
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome
ID : 101092/Z/13/Z
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH118285
Pays : United States
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Eichert et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
NE, ER, KB, SJ, MJ, LL, KW, RM No competing interests declared, KK Reviewing editor, eLife
Références
Neuroimage. 2014 Jun;93 Pt 2:165-75
pubmed: 23567887
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 22;36(25):6758-70
pubmed: 27335406
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Sep;24(9):2436-48
pubmed: 23599164
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 10;31(32):11597-616
pubmed: 21832190
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Apr;19(4):777-85
pubmed: 18669591
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:1063-1078
pubmed: 26481672
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 26;112(21):E2820-8
pubmed: 25964365
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep;21(9):1251-1259
pubmed: 30082915
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:509-24
pubmed: 24971513
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 2;116(14):7101-7106
pubmed: 30886094
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005 Mar-Apr;14(2):80-7
pubmed: 17904005
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):436-42
pubmed: 23290767
Brain Res. 2017 Nov 15;1675:102-115
pubmed: 28899757
Radiology. 1986 Nov;161(2):401-7
pubmed: 3763909
Neuron. 2018 Oct 10;100(1):61-74.e2
pubmed: 30269990
Elife. 2020 Mar 23;9:
pubmed: 32202497
Science. 2011 Nov 4;334(6056):697-700
pubmed: 22053054
Neuron. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):1109-1116.e5
pubmed: 30765166
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Nov;19(11):1523-1536
pubmed: 27643430
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 25;110(26):10806-11
pubmed: 23754406
J Neurosci. 1991 Mar;11(3):667-89
pubmed: 1705965
Neuroimage. 2014 May 15;92:381-97
pubmed: 24530839
Neuroimage. 2014 Jun;93 Pt 2:176-88
pubmed: 23756203
Cortex. 2019 Sep;118:275-291
pubmed: 31235272
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Dec;68(6):1846-55
pubmed: 22334356
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jul;(244):3-6
pubmed: 2663289
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Aug;15(4):444-53
pubmed: 16026978
Elife. 2018 May 11;7:
pubmed: 29749930
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):606-16
pubmed: 12154362
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 7;8(1):1349
pubmed: 29116093
Phys Med Biol. 1975 May;20(3):477-82
pubmed: 1187771
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:83-94
pubmed: 28666880
Brain Struct Funct. 2009 Feb;213(3):343-58
pubmed: 19104833
Cortex. 2019 Sep;118:38-50
pubmed: 30808550
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):426-8
pubmed: 18344993
Cereb Cortex. 2013 May;23(5):1014-24
pubmed: 22539611
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:105-24
pubmed: 23668970
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):870-88
pubmed: 14568458
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:124-37
pubmed: 25534109
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 20;115(12):3156-3161
pubmed: 29507201
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Apr;224(3):1021-1033
pubmed: 30569281
Elife. 2019 May 23;8:
pubmed: 31120417
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Nov;50(5):1077-88
pubmed: 14587019
Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Mar 10;:
pubmed: 32157450
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):144-55
pubmed: 17070705
Brain Connect. 2011;1(3):169-83
pubmed: 22433046
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jun 1;27(6):3346-3359
pubmed: 28369290
J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15;22(16):7195-205
pubmed: 12177214
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):553-65
pubmed: 17292630
Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:36-48
pubmed: 30738206
Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 1;76:400-11
pubmed: 23523807
Nature. 2007 May 3;447(7140):83-6
pubmed: 17476267
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
pubmed: 15501092
Cortex. 2014 Jul;56:73-84
pubmed: 23137651
Cortex. 2019 Sep;118:107-115
pubmed: 29937266
Cortex. 2019 Sep;118:223-243
pubmed: 30910223
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Dec 14;355:12-23
pubmed: 29471028
Brain Imaging Behav. 2013 Sep;7(3):335-52
pubmed: 23686576
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Nov;221(8):4059-4071
pubmed: 26627483
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):1000-16
pubmed: 22484410
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Oct;44(4):625-32
pubmed: 11025519
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:453-465
pubmed: 29100940
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):21-31
pubmed: 29203085
J Anat. 2000 Oct;197 Pt 3:335-59
pubmed: 11117622
Cortex. 2014 Oct;59:33-48
pubmed: 25128898
J Neurosci. 2013 Feb 13;33(7):3190-201
pubmed: 23407972
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:414-26
pubmed: 24939340
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):23-30
pubmed: 1348133
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 29;115(22):E5183-E5192
pubmed: 29739891
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Oct;28:165-71
pubmed: 25156623
Cortex. 2008 Sep;44(8):1105-32
pubmed: 18619589
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):18035-40
pubmed: 19004769
Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):145-77
pubmed: 15037129
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):3045-3055
pubmed: 28193685
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;22(11):1026-1037
pubmed: 30241910
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Apr;32(4):544-63
pubmed: 20945352
Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Oct;34(10):2248-60
pubmed: 23623601
Inf Process Med Imaging. 2013;23:475-86
pubmed: 24683992
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 May;8(5):393-402
pubmed: 17431404
Nature. 2016 Aug 11;536(7615):171-178
pubmed: 27437579
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Oct;26(10):3928-3944
pubmed: 27371764
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:462-74
pubmed: 23603286
Cortex. 2019 Sep;118:188-202
pubmed: 30661736